CT in non-traumatic acute abdominal emergencies: Comparison of unenhanced acquisitions and single-energy iodine mapping for the characterization of bowel wall enhancement
Sophie Boyer, Charles Lombard, Ayla Urbaneja, Céline Vogrig, Denis Regent, Alain Blum, Pedro Augusto Gondim Teixeira
{"title":"CT in non-traumatic acute abdominal emergencies: Comparison of unenhanced acquisitions and single-energy iodine mapping for the characterization of bowel wall enhancement","authors":"Sophie Boyer, Charles Lombard, Ayla Urbaneja, Céline Vogrig, Denis Regent, Alain Blum, Pedro Augusto Gondim Teixeira","doi":"10.1016/j.redii.2022.100010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate the benefit of unenhanced CT and single energy iodine mapping (SIM) to conventional contrast-enhanced CT for bowel wall enhancement characterization in an acute abdomen setting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>CT images from 45 patients with a suspected acute abdomen who underwent abdominopelvic CT from April 2018 to June 2018 were analyzed retrospectively by two independent radiologists. These patients had been referred by emergency department physicians in a context of acute abdominal pain and had a confirmed etiological diagnosis. Three image sets were evaluated separately (portal phase images alone; portal phase images and unenhanced images, portal phase images, and single energy iodine maps). Diagnostic accuracy and confidence were assessed. Quantitative analysis of bowel wall enhancement was also performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The number of correct diagnoses increased by 8% and 12% with unenhanced images and 6% and 13% with SIM for readers 1 and 2, respectively, compared to the portal phase only. There was an improvement in the confidence of the etiological diagnosis with the number of certain diagnoses increasing from 23% to 100%, which was statistically significant for reader 2 and of borderline significance for reader 1 (<em>P</em> = 0.002 and 0.052, respectively) when unenhanced phase and SIM were added. The inter-rater agreement improved when unenhanced and portal phase images were associated, compared to portal phase images alone (kappa = 0.652 [ICC=0.482–0.822] and 0.42 [ICC=0.241–0.607] respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>SIM and unenhanced images improve the reproducibility and the diagnostic confidence to diagnose ischemic and inflammatory/infectious bowel wall thickening compared to portal phase images alone</p></div><div><h3>Summary sentence</h3><p>The analysis of unenhanced and SIM images in association with portal phase images improves the reproducibility and the radiologist's confidence in the etiological diagnosis of acute non-traumatic bowel wall thickening in adults.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74676,"journal":{"name":"Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100010"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772652522000102/pdfft?md5=3a976b9a4af0f72983e1a9c5962f7058&pid=1-s2.0-S2772652522000102-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772652522000102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To evaluate the benefit of unenhanced CT and single energy iodine mapping (SIM) to conventional contrast-enhanced CT for bowel wall enhancement characterization in an acute abdomen setting.
Methods
CT images from 45 patients with a suspected acute abdomen who underwent abdominopelvic CT from April 2018 to June 2018 were analyzed retrospectively by two independent radiologists. These patients had been referred by emergency department physicians in a context of acute abdominal pain and had a confirmed etiological diagnosis. Three image sets were evaluated separately (portal phase images alone; portal phase images and unenhanced images, portal phase images, and single energy iodine maps). Diagnostic accuracy and confidence were assessed. Quantitative analysis of bowel wall enhancement was also performed.
Results
The number of correct diagnoses increased by 8% and 12% with unenhanced images and 6% and 13% with SIM for readers 1 and 2, respectively, compared to the portal phase only. There was an improvement in the confidence of the etiological diagnosis with the number of certain diagnoses increasing from 23% to 100%, which was statistically significant for reader 2 and of borderline significance for reader 1 (P = 0.002 and 0.052, respectively) when unenhanced phase and SIM were added. The inter-rater agreement improved when unenhanced and portal phase images were associated, compared to portal phase images alone (kappa = 0.652 [ICC=0.482–0.822] and 0.42 [ICC=0.241–0.607] respectively).
Conclusion
SIM and unenhanced images improve the reproducibility and the diagnostic confidence to diagnose ischemic and inflammatory/infectious bowel wall thickening compared to portal phase images alone
Summary sentence
The analysis of unenhanced and SIM images in association with portal phase images improves the reproducibility and the radiologist's confidence in the etiological diagnosis of acute non-traumatic bowel wall thickening in adults.