“Soft Gold” Before the Gold Rush: Sea Otter Pelts in the “Competitive Expansion” of Merchant Capitalism and the Creation of a Pacific Ocean Economy

IF 0.3 4区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY Historia Critica Pub Date : 2023-07-04 DOI:10.7440/histcrit89.2023.07
Arturo Giráldéz, Analiese M. Richard
{"title":"“Soft Gold” Before the Gold Rush: Sea Otter Pelts in the “Competitive Expansion” of Merchant Capitalism and the Creation of a Pacific Ocean Economy","authors":"Arturo Giráldéz, Analiese M. Richard","doi":"10.7440/histcrit89.2023.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective/Context: In this article, we examine how Chinese demand for pelts—of sea otters and other marine mammals—fueled the eighteenth-century competitive expansion of European and later American merchants and explorers in the Pacific islands and along the Pacific coast of North America. Sea otter pelts were a commodity directly linked to the creation of a Pacific Ocean economy, and California’s colonization resulted from imperial dynamics to which this trade gave rise. Methodology: Using both primary and secondary sources, we examine how these merchants’ quest to supply the lucrative Chinese luxury market with furs—“soft gold”—brought them into contact with indigenous peoples whose livelihoods and commercial networks would also be recruited into this global market but on quite unequal terms and with devastating consequences. Originality: The growth of this Pacific trade throughout the eighteenth century fueled geopolitical rivalries that led to the colonization of California with a system of missions and military garrisons (presidios) and, eventually, to a new ecology as a result of plants and animals brought from New Spain before the Gold Rush and the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. Many, including Marx and Engels, have claimed that the Gold Rush contributed significantly to the dynamics of industrial capitalism; nevertheless, we argue that its conditions of possibility were laid out centuries earlier via the complex geopolitical and ecological connections through which this Pacific economy was articulated. Conclusions: During the eighteenth century, the Pacific’s products were extracted and commodified in circuits whose demand center was China. It is precisely the prior existence of these global markets—centered on silver and “soft gold,” or sea otter furs—that explains the presence of Europeans and Americans in California eager to prospect for the yellow metal in 1848.","PeriodicalId":45016,"journal":{"name":"Historia Critica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historia Critica","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7440/histcrit89.2023.07","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective/Context: In this article, we examine how Chinese demand for pelts—of sea otters and other marine mammals—fueled the eighteenth-century competitive expansion of European and later American merchants and explorers in the Pacific islands and along the Pacific coast of North America. Sea otter pelts were a commodity directly linked to the creation of a Pacific Ocean economy, and California’s colonization resulted from imperial dynamics to which this trade gave rise. Methodology: Using both primary and secondary sources, we examine how these merchants’ quest to supply the lucrative Chinese luxury market with furs—“soft gold”—brought them into contact with indigenous peoples whose livelihoods and commercial networks would also be recruited into this global market but on quite unequal terms and with devastating consequences. Originality: The growth of this Pacific trade throughout the eighteenth century fueled geopolitical rivalries that led to the colonization of California with a system of missions and military garrisons (presidios) and, eventually, to a new ecology as a result of plants and animals brought from New Spain before the Gold Rush and the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. Many, including Marx and Engels, have claimed that the Gold Rush contributed significantly to the dynamics of industrial capitalism; nevertheless, we argue that its conditions of possibility were laid out centuries earlier via the complex geopolitical and ecological connections through which this Pacific economy was articulated. Conclusions: During the eighteenth century, the Pacific’s products were extracted and commodified in circuits whose demand center was China. It is precisely the prior existence of these global markets—centered on silver and “soft gold,” or sea otter furs—that explains the presence of Europeans and Americans in California eager to prospect for the yellow metal in 1848.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
淘金热前的“软黄金”:商人资本主义的“竞争扩张”与太平洋经济的创造
目的/背景:在这篇文章中,我们研究了中国对海獭和其他海洋哺乳动物毛皮的需求是如何推动18世纪欧洲和后来的美国商人和探险家在太平洋岛屿和北美太平洋沿岸的竞争扩张的。海獭毛皮是一种与太平洋经济的创建直接相关的商品,而加利福尼亚的殖民化是这种贸易产生的帝国动力的结果。方法:我们利用主要和次要来源,研究了这些商人如何向利润丰厚的中国奢侈品市场供应毛皮——“软黄金”——使他们与土著人民接触,这些土著人民的生计和商业网络也会被招募到这个全球市场,但条件非常不平等,并带来毁灭性的后果。独创性:整个18世纪,这种太平洋贸易的增长助长了地缘政治对抗,导致了加利福尼亚州的殖民,建立了一个使团和军事驻军系统(presidios),并最终因淘金热和瓜达卢佩-伊达尔戈条约之前从新西班牙带来的动植物而形成了新的生态系统。包括马克思和恩格斯在内的许多人都声称,淘金热对工业资本主义的发展做出了重大贡献;然而,我们认为,它的可能性条件是在几个世纪前通过复杂的地缘政治和生态联系而提出的,而太平洋经济正是通过这种联系来表达的。结论:在18世纪,太平洋地区的产品在以中国为需求中心的电路中被提取并商品化。正是这些以白银和“软黄金”或海獭毛皮为中心的全球市场的存在,解释了1848年欧洲人和美国人在加利福尼亚州渴望寻找这种黄色金属的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Historia Critica
Historia Critica Multiple-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: Historia Crítica es la revista del Departamento de Historia de la Universidad de los Andes (Bogotá, Colombia). Cumple con sus lectores desde su creación en 1989. La revista Historia Crítica tiene como objetivo publicar artículos inéditos de autores nacionales y extranjeros, que presenten resultados de investigación histórica o balances historiográficos, así como reflexiones académicas relacionadas con los estudios históricos. La calidad de los artículos se asegura mediante un proceso de evaluación interno y externo, el cual es realizado por pares académicos nacionales e internacionales.
期刊最新文献
La “vía chilena al socialismo” desde la óptica argentina del Partido Revolucionario de los Trabajadores-Ejército Revolucionario del Pueblo (PRT-ERP) La Unidad Popular chilena (1970-1973): balance historiográfico y nuevas perspectivas trasnacionales Montaje de redes: cooperación cinematográfica, circulación trasnacional y acopio de materiales fílmicos sobre la Unidad Popular (1970-1973) Unidad Popular chilena y el comunismo español. Análisis, solidaridad y lecciones políticas (1970-1973) ¿Ideología o pragmatismo? Corea del Sur y el Gobierno de la Unidad Popular (1970-1973)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1