Blogs brasileiros sobre suicídio

Nadja Cristiane Lappann Botti, Camila Corrêa Matias Pereira
{"title":"Blogs brasileiros sobre suicídio","authors":"Nadja Cristiane Lappann Botti, Camila Corrêa Matias Pereira","doi":"10.22199/S07187475.2019.0001.00001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Suicidal behavior is an internet wide spread complex topic. Some websites support it; others are against it. Objective: To analyze the content of Brazilian blogs about suicide. Method: This is a descriptive-exploratory study. Blogs against and in favor of suicide were collected through Google. The criteria for the search included Brazilian blogs with more than one post about suicide, those with frequent posts about suicide in a year and blogs with posts until December 2014. Computer-mediated discourse analysis was used to analyze the sample. Results: Five blogs supporting suicide and five against were identified with features related to the levels of computer-mediated discourse analysis. Blogs against suicide present higher time of activity, higher number of messages, higher diversity regarding social networks connectivity, higher visits. They also include profile descriptions and use of real names in comparison with blogs supporting suicide. Conclusion: Internet holds relevant content that allows investigating risk factors and protection against suicide as well as the development of online prevention strategies.","PeriodicalId":90336,"journal":{"name":"Salud y Sociedad","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Salud y Sociedad","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22199/S07187475.2019.0001.00001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Suicidal behavior is an internet wide spread complex topic. Some websites support it; others are against it. Objective: To analyze the content of Brazilian blogs about suicide. Method: This is a descriptive-exploratory study. Blogs against and in favor of suicide were collected through Google. The criteria for the search included Brazilian blogs with more than one post about suicide, those with frequent posts about suicide in a year and blogs with posts until December 2014. Computer-mediated discourse analysis was used to analyze the sample. Results: Five blogs supporting suicide and five against were identified with features related to the levels of computer-mediated discourse analysis. Blogs against suicide present higher time of activity, higher number of messages, higher diversity regarding social networks connectivity, higher visits. They also include profile descriptions and use of real names in comparison with blogs supporting suicide. Conclusion: Internet holds relevant content that allows investigating risk factors and protection against suicide as well as the development of online prevention strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于自杀的巴西博客
自杀行为是一个在互联网上广泛传播的复杂话题。一些网站支持它;其他人则反对。目的:分析巴西博客中有关自杀的内容。方法:采用描述性探索性研究。反对和支持自杀的博客是通过谷歌收集的。搜索的标准包括有不止一篇关于自杀的文章的巴西博客,在一年内频繁发表自杀文章的博客,以及在2014年12月之前发表文章的博客。使用计算机中介语篇分析对样本进行分析。结果:5个支持自杀的博客和5个反对自杀的博客被识别出与计算机中介话语分析水平相关的特征。反对自杀的博客呈现出更高的活动时间,更多的信息,更多的社交网络连接多样性,更高的访问量。与支持自杀的博客相比,它们还包括个人资料描述和使用实名。结论:互联网拥有相关的内容,可以调查自杀的风险因素和预防措施,以及制定在线预防策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Medidas desenvolvidas para avaliar os impactos psicológicos da pandemia de COVID-19: uma revisão sistemática da literatura Ciberacoso entre observadores de un colegio de Colombia Percepção da doença e de risco na obesidade: revisão sistemática Autocuidado e cuidado de pessoas com câncer e dispositivos médicos de alimentação Resilience assessment in mexicans diagnosed with HIV
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1