TALIBAN AND ISIS: AN ANALYTICAL COMPARISON

IF 0.5 0 RELIGION Politics and Religion Journal Pub Date : 2023-05-02 DOI:10.54561/prj1701053m
Muhammad Moheq, Riad Amiraoui, Bashir Ansari
{"title":"TALIBAN AND ISIS: AN ANALYTICAL COMPARISON","authors":"Muhammad Moheq, Riad Amiraoui, Bashir Ansari","doi":"10.54561/prj1701053m","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A complex relationship between Taliban and ISIS is often assumed, but it has not been yet systematically investigated. In this paper we will attempt to compare the two groups in the areas of their social origins, how each appeared in the Islamic arena, organizational characteristics, the influence of other ideological movements or tribal mechanisms on their organizational system, political agenda, faith, theology, jurisprudence, ethics, and Mysticism by exploring the commonalities and differences that exist between the two groups. This paper also contributes towards the conceptualization of the immediate and long-term political and security implications of the Taliban’s return to power. In addition to that, the paper discusses the relations of these two groups with the ethnic fabric of their societies and their relationship with the rest of the ideological movements in the Islamic world. These two groups cannot be understood without delving into the deep roots of their theological foundation.","PeriodicalId":41271,"journal":{"name":"Politics and Religion Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics and Religion Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54561/prj1701053m","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A complex relationship between Taliban and ISIS is often assumed, but it has not been yet systematically investigated. In this paper we will attempt to compare the two groups in the areas of their social origins, how each appeared in the Islamic arena, organizational characteristics, the influence of other ideological movements or tribal mechanisms on their organizational system, political agenda, faith, theology, jurisprudence, ethics, and Mysticism by exploring the commonalities and differences that exist between the two groups. This paper also contributes towards the conceptualization of the immediate and long-term political and security implications of the Taliban’s return to power. In addition to that, the paper discusses the relations of these two groups with the ethnic fabric of their societies and their relationship with the rest of the ideological movements in the Islamic world. These two groups cannot be understood without delving into the deep roots of their theological foundation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塔利班和isis:分析比较
人们通常认为塔利班和伊斯兰国之间存在复杂关系,但尚未对其进行系统调查。在这篇论文中,我们将试图从两个群体的社会起源、各自在伊斯兰舞台上的表现、组织特征、其他意识形态运动或部落机制对其组织体系、政治议程、信仰、神学、法学、伦理学、,和神秘主义,通过探索两个群体之间存在的共性和差异。本文件也有助于概念化塔利班重新掌权的直接和长期政治和安全影响。除此之外,本文还讨论了这两个群体与其社会的种族结构的关系,以及他们与伊斯兰世界其他意识形态运动的关系。如果不深入研究这两个群体神学基础的深层根源,就无法理解这两个团体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Word from the Guest Editor: Politics and Religion in Israel A Word from the Editor-in-Chief: Religious Wars in XXI century – A Challenge for Politology of Religion Between Separatism and Pragmatism: Judaism as National Identity in the Haredi Political Discourse Gender, State and Religion: Palestinian Feminist Politics “On the Side of the Good”: Political Alliances of Religious Zionists and Israeli Conservatism in the Quest to Hegemony
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1