Characteristics of Fatal Road Traffic Crashes Associated with Alcohol and Illicit Substances in Queensland (2011-2015)

IF 0.4 Q4 TRANSPORTATION Journal of Road Safety-JRS Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI:10.33492/jrs-d-20-00146
J. Freeman, A. Parkes, K. Armstrong, J. Davey
{"title":"Characteristics of Fatal Road Traffic Crashes Associated with Alcohol and Illicit Substances in Queensland (2011-2015)","authors":"J. Freeman, A. Parkes, K. Armstrong, J. Davey","doi":"10.33492/jrs-d-20-00146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Psychoactive substances affect driver behaviour in different ways, some of which can increase the risk of traffic crashes. This study investigated coroners findings for fatal road traffic crashes in Queensland for crash factors and driver behaviours associated with and without the presence of alcohol or illicit drugs. A total of 701 coroners reports for the period of 2011 to 2015 were analysed revealing 306 fatal incidents involving the detection of either alcohol or target illegal drugs (e.g., methamphetamine, THC [cannabis], cocaine or MDMA). Alcohol was most often detected (223 cases; 72.9% of the drug and alcohol sample and 31.8% of the entire sample), and a majority of fatalities involving alcohol (n = 114, 51% of alcohol cases) were at high range BAC levels (>.150g/100ml). Of these, 37 (32.5% of high range and 16.6% of alcohol cases) were detected with illicit drugs. Single vehicle and multi-vehicle crashes were evenly represented, although males were overrepresented in all crash types. Alcohol and poly drug consumption were more likely to be associated with single vehicle crashes (81.7% and 64.6% respectively), while detections of methamphetamines and THC in isolation without other substances were slightly overrepresented by multi-vehicle crashes (58.6% and 59.4% respectively). Single vehicle crashes usually involved speeding, loss of control and failure to negotiate a curve while multi-vehicle crashes were disproportionately represented by reckless driving and misjudging traffic conditions. Overall, an important theme to emerge was the contribution of illicit drugs and alcohol to the majority of single vehicle crashes, highlighting the increased risk of this type of crash for drivers who are positive with these substances.","PeriodicalId":53198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Road Safety-JRS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Road Safety-JRS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33492/jrs-d-20-00146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Psychoactive substances affect driver behaviour in different ways, some of which can increase the risk of traffic crashes. This study investigated coroners findings for fatal road traffic crashes in Queensland for crash factors and driver behaviours associated with and without the presence of alcohol or illicit drugs. A total of 701 coroners reports for the period of 2011 to 2015 were analysed revealing 306 fatal incidents involving the detection of either alcohol or target illegal drugs (e.g., methamphetamine, THC [cannabis], cocaine or MDMA). Alcohol was most often detected (223 cases; 72.9% of the drug and alcohol sample and 31.8% of the entire sample), and a majority of fatalities involving alcohol (n = 114, 51% of alcohol cases) were at high range BAC levels (>.150g/100ml). Of these, 37 (32.5% of high range and 16.6% of alcohol cases) were detected with illicit drugs. Single vehicle and multi-vehicle crashes were evenly represented, although males were overrepresented in all crash types. Alcohol and poly drug consumption were more likely to be associated with single vehicle crashes (81.7% and 64.6% respectively), while detections of methamphetamines and THC in isolation without other substances were slightly overrepresented by multi-vehicle crashes (58.6% and 59.4% respectively). Single vehicle crashes usually involved speeding, loss of control and failure to negotiate a curve while multi-vehicle crashes were disproportionately represented by reckless driving and misjudging traffic conditions. Overall, an important theme to emerge was the contribution of illicit drugs and alcohol to the majority of single vehicle crashes, highlighting the increased risk of this type of crash for drivers who are positive with these substances.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2011-2015年昆士兰州与酒精和非法药物有关的致命道路交通事故特征
精神活性物质以不同的方式影响司机的行为,其中一些会增加交通事故的风险。这项研究调查了验尸官对昆士兰州致命道路交通事故的调查结果,包括与酒精或非法药物存在与否相关的事故因素和驾驶员行为。对2011年至2015年期间的701份验尸报告进行了分析,揭示了306起涉及检测酒精或目标非法药物(如甲基苯丙胺、四氢大麻酚[大麻]、可卡因或摇头丸)的致命事件。酒精是最常见的(223例;72.9%的药物和酒精样本和31.8%的整个样本),大多数与酒精有关的死亡(n = 114, 51%的酒精病例)是高范围BAC水平(>.150g/100ml)。其中37例(32.5%的高范围病例和16.6%的酗酒病例)被查出有非法药物。尽管男性在所有碰撞类型中比例过高,但单车和多车碰撞的比例平均。酒精和多种药物消费更可能与单一车辆碰撞相关(分别为81.7%和64.6%),而在没有其他物质的情况下,甲基苯丙胺和四氢大麻酚的分离检测在多车辆碰撞中所占比例略高(分别为58.6%和59.4%)。单车碰撞通常涉及超速、失控和无法通过弯道,而多车碰撞则不成比例地由鲁莽驾驶和误判交通状况所代表。总体而言,将出现的一个重要主题是非法药物和酒精对大多数单一车辆碰撞的影响,突出表明对这些物质呈阳性反应的驾驶员发生此类碰撞的风险增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Road Safety-JRS
Journal of Road Safety-JRS TRANSPORTATION-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
How Do Young Provisional Drivers Who Crash Early Compare With Those Who Only Crash Later? Readability of Australian Road Safety Information for the General Public Auckland Transport’s Mass Action Pedestrian Improvement Programme Driving for Work Crashes: A Systems Analysis Insights Into Wire Rope Safety Barrier Crashes Based on Police-Reported Statistics and Narratives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1