Insights Into Wire Rope Safety Barrier Crashes Based on Police-Reported Statistics and Narratives

IF 0.4 Q4 TRANSPORTATION Journal of Road Safety-JRS Pub Date : 2023-08-23 DOI:10.33492/jrs-d-22-00024
N. Candappa, J. Berecki-Gisolf, David Logan
{"title":"Insights Into Wire Rope Safety Barrier Crashes Based on Police-Reported Statistics and Narratives","authors":"N. Candappa, J. Berecki-Gisolf, David Logan","doi":"10.33492/jrs-d-22-00024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wire rope safety barrier (WRSB) is known to be highly effective in reducing the severity of off-road or off-path crashes, however fatal and serious injury outcomes still occur in a small percentage of WRSB-involved crashes. Yet, there is little research on why some WRSB crashes result in severe injury while the majority of crashes involve minor injury outcomes. This paper includes detailed analysis of off-path crashes involving WRSB to better understand associated factors that contribute to severe injury outcomes. Three datasets were analysed: four years of NSW police-reported crash data (2014-2017); ten years of Victorian police-reported crash data and police narratives (2008-2017); five years of police narratives from the US (2001-2005). Results supported earlier research that indicated a relatively low percentage of WRSB crashes involved fatal and serious injury outcomes. Yet, adverse vehicle dynamics were also observed, such as vehicle ricochetting and barrier override, suggesting barrier safety performance could be improved. Some crashes also involved impact angles greater than those used in crash tests, supporting earlier, more detailed research that the full range of real-world crash conditions involving WRSB are not covered in barrier test protocols, and these might be the conditions contributing to severe injury outcomes. The findings provide insight into the potential factors associated with the serious injury outcomes of crashes and can guide further improvements in this effective highway crash countermeasure. Future research should include detailed analysis of real-world crashes to identify factors contributing to adverse crash dynamics, injury outcomes and subsequent implications for barrier design.","PeriodicalId":53198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Road Safety-JRS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Road Safety-JRS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33492/jrs-d-22-00024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wire rope safety barrier (WRSB) is known to be highly effective in reducing the severity of off-road or off-path crashes, however fatal and serious injury outcomes still occur in a small percentage of WRSB-involved crashes. Yet, there is little research on why some WRSB crashes result in severe injury while the majority of crashes involve minor injury outcomes. This paper includes detailed analysis of off-path crashes involving WRSB to better understand associated factors that contribute to severe injury outcomes. Three datasets were analysed: four years of NSW police-reported crash data (2014-2017); ten years of Victorian police-reported crash data and police narratives (2008-2017); five years of police narratives from the US (2001-2005). Results supported earlier research that indicated a relatively low percentage of WRSB crashes involved fatal and serious injury outcomes. Yet, adverse vehicle dynamics were also observed, such as vehicle ricochetting and barrier override, suggesting barrier safety performance could be improved. Some crashes also involved impact angles greater than those used in crash tests, supporting earlier, more detailed research that the full range of real-world crash conditions involving WRSB are not covered in barrier test protocols, and these might be the conditions contributing to severe injury outcomes. The findings provide insight into the potential factors associated with the serious injury outcomes of crashes and can guide further improvements in this effective highway crash countermeasure. Future research should include detailed analysis of real-world crashes to identify factors contributing to adverse crash dynamics, injury outcomes and subsequent implications for barrier design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于警方报告的统计数据和叙述对钢丝绳安全屏障事故的见解
众所周知,钢丝绳安全屏障(WRSB)在降低越野或越野碰撞的严重程度方面非常有效,然而,在涉及WRSB的碰撞中,仍有一小部分发生致命和严重伤害的结果。然而,关于为什么一些WRSB碰撞导致严重伤害而大多数碰撞涉及轻微伤害结果的研究很少。本文包括对涉及WRSB的越野碰撞的详细分析,以更好地了解导致严重伤害结果的相关因素。分析了三个数据集:新南威尔士州警方报告的四年车祸数据(2014-2017);十年维多利亚州警方报告的撞车数据和警方叙述(2008-2017);美国警察五年的故事(2001-2005)。结果支持了早期的研究,表明WRSB碰撞涉及致命和严重伤害结果的比例相对较低。然而,也观察到车辆的不利动力学,如车辆弹跳和障碍物覆盖,表明障碍物的安全性能可以得到改善。一些碰撞还涉及比碰撞测试中使用的碰撞角度更大的碰撞角度,这支持了更早、更详细的研究,即涉及WRSB的全范围真实碰撞情况并未包括在屏障测试协议中,而这些可能是导致严重伤害结果的条件。该研究结果为深入了解与碰撞严重伤害结果相关的潜在因素提供了见解,并可以指导进一步改进这一有效的公路碰撞对策。未来的研究应该包括对现实世界碰撞的详细分析,以确定导致不利碰撞动力学、伤害结果和随后对屏障设计的影响的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Road Safety-JRS
Journal of Road Safety-JRS TRANSPORTATION-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
How Do Young Provisional Drivers Who Crash Early Compare With Those Who Only Crash Later? Readability of Australian Road Safety Information for the General Public Auckland Transport’s Mass Action Pedestrian Improvement Programme Driving for Work Crashes: A Systems Analysis Insights Into Wire Rope Safety Barrier Crashes Based on Police-Reported Statistics and Narratives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1