{"title":"“We Must Work… Toward Justice in Action”: Grievances, Claims Making, and Spillover in the Idle No More Movement","authors":"J. Schweitzer, Tamara L. Mix, O. Fleming","doi":"10.1177/23294965221109167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Idle No More (INM) movement emerged in reaction to Bill C-45, the Canadian Jobs and Growth Act, in November 2012, inspiring a new wave of activism. Central to the movement’s grievances are Indigenous resistance and environmental justice (EJ), positioning INM’s activities against neo-colonialism, exploitation, and environmental degradation. We build upon existing EJ movements, Indigenous Peoples/Indigenous Environmental Justice (IEJ) movements, and social movement spillover, grievance, and claims making literatures to understand the role of shared movement narratives in encouraging mobilization. INM relies on social media to educate members and construct and communicate movement goals and actions. Analyzing 6 months of Facebook comments, reflecting the INM movement’s emergence period, we argue that INM activists employ structural grievances embedded in previous EJ and Indigenous resistance movements, combined with emerging (incidental) grievances to articulate shared claims that address inequality and justice, appealing to a range of potential supporters. We offer an analysis of the emergent INM movement to consider the active intersection of EJ, Indigenous Peoples, and IEJ movements to mobilize and sustain movement activities in spite of Bill C-45’s passage.","PeriodicalId":44139,"journal":{"name":"Social Currents","volume":"10 1","pages":"84 - 102"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Currents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23294965221109167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Idle No More (INM) movement emerged in reaction to Bill C-45, the Canadian Jobs and Growth Act, in November 2012, inspiring a new wave of activism. Central to the movement’s grievances are Indigenous resistance and environmental justice (EJ), positioning INM’s activities against neo-colonialism, exploitation, and environmental degradation. We build upon existing EJ movements, Indigenous Peoples/Indigenous Environmental Justice (IEJ) movements, and social movement spillover, grievance, and claims making literatures to understand the role of shared movement narratives in encouraging mobilization. INM relies on social media to educate members and construct and communicate movement goals and actions. Analyzing 6 months of Facebook comments, reflecting the INM movement’s emergence period, we argue that INM activists employ structural grievances embedded in previous EJ and Indigenous resistance movements, combined with emerging (incidental) grievances to articulate shared claims that address inequality and justice, appealing to a range of potential supporters. We offer an analysis of the emergent INM movement to consider the active intersection of EJ, Indigenous Peoples, and IEJ movements to mobilize and sustain movement activities in spite of Bill C-45’s passage.
2012年11月,针对《加拿大就业与增长法案》(Canadian Jobs and Growth Act)C-45法案,出现了“不再无所事事”(INM)运动,激发了新一轮的激进主义浪潮。该运动不满的核心是土著抵抗和环境正义(EJ),将INM的活动定位为反对新殖民主义、剥削和环境退化。我们以现有的EJ运动、土著人民/土著环境正义(IEJ)运动以及社会运动溢出、申诉和索赔文献为基础,了解共同运动叙事在鼓励动员方面的作用。INM依靠社交媒体来教育成员,构建和交流运动目标和行动。通过分析6个月来脸书上的评论,反映了INM运动的兴起时期,我们认为INM活动家利用之前EJ和土著抵抗运动中的结构性不满,结合新出现的(偶然的)不满,阐明了解决不平等和正义的共同主张,吸引了一系列潜在的支持者。我们对新兴的INM运动进行了分析,以考虑EJ、土著人民和IEJ运动的积极交叉,以动员和维持运动活动,尽管法案C-45获得通过。
期刊介绍:
Social Currents, the official journal of the Southern Sociological Society, is a broad-ranging social science journal that focuses on cutting-edge research from all methodological and theoretical orientations with implications for national and international sociological communities. The uniqueness of Social Currents lies in its format. The front end of every issue is devoted to short, theoretical, agenda-setting contributions and brief, empirical and policy-related pieces. The back end of every issue includes standard journal articles that cover topics within specific subfields of sociology, as well as across the social sciences more broadly.