Diversity-sensitive social platforms and responsibility

IF 0.7 4区 管理学 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Informacios Tarsadalom Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.22503/inftars.xxi.2021.2.4
Karoline Reinhardt
{"title":"Diversity-sensitive social platforms and responsibility","authors":"Karoline Reinhardt","doi":"10.22503/inftars.xxi.2021.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is an ongoing debate on how algorithms and machine learning can and should deal with human diversity while avoiding the pitfalls of statistical stereotyping, the re-enforcement of clichés and the perpetuation of unjust discrimination. Computer\nscientists try to tackle these issues by developing algorithms and social-interaction protocols for mediating diversity-aware interactions between people, for instance on diversity-sensitive social platforms. At the same time, diversity-related data often comprise sensitive personal data, and their collection, storage and management increases the vulnerability of users to various misuse scenarios. Already this observation leads to the question, how do we need to conceptualize responsibility to do justice to the increased vulnerability? In this paper, I thus focus on the questions a diversity-sensitive social platform raises with regard to responsibility, and propose a tentative ethical framework of responsibility for these platforms.","PeriodicalId":41114,"journal":{"name":"Informacios Tarsadalom","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informacios Tarsadalom","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22503/inftars.xxi.2021.2.4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate on how algorithms and machine learning can and should deal with human diversity while avoiding the pitfalls of statistical stereotyping, the re-enforcement of clichés and the perpetuation of unjust discrimination. Computer scientists try to tackle these issues by developing algorithms and social-interaction protocols for mediating diversity-aware interactions between people, for instance on diversity-sensitive social platforms. At the same time, diversity-related data often comprise sensitive personal data, and their collection, storage and management increases the vulnerability of users to various misuse scenarios. Already this observation leads to the question, how do we need to conceptualize responsibility to do justice to the increased vulnerability? In this paper, I thus focus on the questions a diversity-sensitive social platform raises with regard to responsibility, and propose a tentative ethical framework of responsibility for these platforms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对多样性敏感的社交平台和责任
关于算法和机器学习如何能够而且应该处理人类多样性,同时避免统计刻板印象的陷阱、陈词滥调的重新实施和不公正歧视的延续,人们正在进行一场辩论。计算机科学家试图通过开发算法和社会互动协议来解决这些问题,以调解人们之间的多样性意识互动,例如在多样性敏感的社交平台上。同时,与多样性相关的数据往往包含敏感的个人数据,其收集、存储和管理增加了用户对各种滥用场景的脆弱性。这种观察已经导致了一个问题,我们需要如何将责任概念化,以公正地对待日益增加的脆弱性?因此,在本文中,我将重点关注多样性敏感的社会平台在责任方面提出的问题,并为这些平台提出一个试探性的责任伦理框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Informacios Tarsadalom
Informacios Tarsadalom INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
„Feltaláltuk újra az internetet?” Szülői bevonódás a digitális nevelésben: szisztematikus szakirodalom-elemzés Makrogazdasági adatok által determinált teniszsikerek 38 OECD-ország elit női játékosának vizsgálatában Az adatműveltség és a kritikai szellem Kiállítási kommunikáció a kiterjesztett térben
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1