Electromyography-based fatigue assessment of an upper body exoskeleton during automotive assembly.

IF 3.4 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Wearable technologies Pub Date : 2022-09-19 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1017/wtc.2022.20
Jason C Gillette, Shekoofe Saadat, Terry Butler
{"title":"Electromyography-based fatigue assessment of an upper body exoskeleton during automotive assembly.","authors":"Jason C Gillette, Shekoofe Saadat, Terry Butler","doi":"10.1017/wtc.2022.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to assess an upper body exoskeleton during automotive assembly processes that involve elevated arm postures. Sixteen team members at Toyota Motor Manufacturing Canada were fitted with a Levitate Airframe, and each team member performed between one and three processes with and without the exoskeleton. A total of 16 assembly processes were studied. Electromyography (EMG) data were collected on the anterior deltoid, biceps brachii, upper trapezius, and erector spinae. Team members also completed a usability survey. The exoskeleton significantly reduced anterior deltoid mean active EMG amplitude (<i>p</i> = .01, Δ = -3.2 %MVC, <i>d</i> = 0.56 medium effect) and fatigue risk value (<i>p</i> < .01, Δ = -5.1 %MVC, <i>d</i> = 0.62 medium effect) across the assembly processes, with no significant changes for the other muscles tested. A subset of nine assembly processes with a greater amount of time spent in arm elevations at or above 90° (30 vs. 24%) and at or above 135° (18 vs. 9%) appeared to benefit more from exoskeleton usage. For these processes, the exoskeleton significantly reduced anterior deltoid mean active EMG amplitude (<i>p</i> < .01, Δ = -5.1 %MVC, <i>d</i> = 0.95 large effect) and fatigue risk value (<i>p</i> < .01, Δ = -7.4 %MVC, <i>d</i> = 0.96 large effect). Team members responded positively about comfort and fatigue benefits, although there were concerns about the exoskeleton hindering certain job duties. The results support quantitative testing to match exoskeleton usage with specific job tasks and surveying team members for perceived benefits/drawbacks.</p>","PeriodicalId":75318,"journal":{"name":"Wearable technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10936263/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wearable technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/wtc.2022.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess an upper body exoskeleton during automotive assembly processes that involve elevated arm postures. Sixteen team members at Toyota Motor Manufacturing Canada were fitted with a Levitate Airframe, and each team member performed between one and three processes with and without the exoskeleton. A total of 16 assembly processes were studied. Electromyography (EMG) data were collected on the anterior deltoid, biceps brachii, upper trapezius, and erector spinae. Team members also completed a usability survey. The exoskeleton significantly reduced anterior deltoid mean active EMG amplitude (p = .01, Δ = -3.2 %MVC, d = 0.56 medium effect) and fatigue risk value (p < .01, Δ = -5.1 %MVC, d = 0.62 medium effect) across the assembly processes, with no significant changes for the other muscles tested. A subset of nine assembly processes with a greater amount of time spent in arm elevations at or above 90° (30 vs. 24%) and at or above 135° (18 vs. 9%) appeared to benefit more from exoskeleton usage. For these processes, the exoskeleton significantly reduced anterior deltoid mean active EMG amplitude (p < .01, Δ = -5.1 %MVC, d = 0.95 large effect) and fatigue risk value (p < .01, Δ = -7.4 %MVC, d = 0.96 large effect). Team members responded positively about comfort and fatigue benefits, although there were concerns about the exoskeleton hindering certain job duties. The results support quantitative testing to match exoskeleton usage with specific job tasks and surveying team members for perceived benefits/drawbacks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于肌电图的上半身外骨骼在汽车装配过程中的疲劳评估
摘要:本研究的目的是评估上肢外骨骼在汽车装配过程中涉及手臂姿势升高。加拿大丰田汽车制造公司的16名团队成员安装了Levitate机身,每个团队成员在有或没有外骨骼的情况下进行了一到三个过程。共研究了16种装配工艺。收集前三角肌、肱二头肌、上斜方肌和竖脊肌的肌电图(EMG)数据。团队成员还完成了可用性调查。在整个装配过程中,外骨骼显著降低了前三角肌平均活跃肌电信号振幅(p = 0.01, Δ = - 3.2% MVC, d = 0.56中效应)和疲劳风险值(p < 0.01, Δ = - 5.1% MVC, d = 0.62中效应),而其他测试肌肉没有显著变化。9个装配过程的一个子集,在手臂高度为90°或以上(30%对24%)和135°或以上(18%对9%)时花费的时间更长,似乎从外骨骼的使用中受益更多。对于这些过程,外骨骼显著降低了前三角肌平均活跃肌电振幅(p < 0.01, Δ = - 5.1% MVC, d = 0.95大效应)和疲劳风险值(p < 0.01, Δ = - 7.4% MVC, d = 0.96大效应)。尽管有人担心外骨骼会妨碍某些工作职责,但团队成员对舒适和疲劳的好处反应积极。结果支持定量测试,将外骨骼的使用与特定的工作任务相匹配,并调查团队成员的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Concurrent validity of inertial measurement units in range of motion measurements of upper extremity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acute suppression of lower limb spasm by sacral afferent stimulation for people with spinal cord injury: A pilot study GLULA: Linear attention-based model for efficient human activity recognition from wearable sensors Erratum: Validity of estimating center of pressure during walking and running with plantar load from a three-sensor wireless insole - ERRATUM. A novel neck brace to characterize neck mobility impairments following neck dissection in head and neck cancer patients - ADDENDUM.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1