{"title":"“I Will Surely Have You Deported:” Undocumenting Clergy Sexual Abuse in an Immigrant Community","authors":"S. Reynolds","doi":"10.1017/rac.2023.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Clergy sexual violence in immigrant communities is an understudied dimension of the sexual abuse crisis in the Roman Catholic church. Yet records suggest that bishops regularly treated immigrant-serving parishes as dumping grounds for serially abusive clergy. There, evidence suggests, abusers targeted minors from poor, vulnerable, and undocumented families, silencing victims with threats of deportation and further violence. How did legal status intersect with structures of state and ecclesial power and with social hierarchies of visibility in situations of clergy abuse? Centering the case of Msgr. Peter E. Garcia, a priest in the Archdiocese of Los Angeles who abused at least twenty boys between 1966 and 1987, this article examines archival evidence from unsealed clergy personnel files to interrogate the complex politics of documentation in the case. It attends to the relationship between three interwoven forms of (un)documentation: first, the precarious legal and social status of victims; second, the silences, redactions, and euphemisms that characterize church records containing these accounts; and third, the spatial undocumentation at work in the use of migrant parishes as clergy dumping grounds. It demonstrates how a post–Vatican II theological and pastoral imagination of intimacy with the poor, refracted through prisms of state, ecclesial, and clerical dominance, helped to create conditions for the production of invisible victims. The erasure accomplished through the overlapping forms of undocumentation in the Garcia case, it argues, can help to account for the absence of such stories from the broader narrative of Catholic clergy sexual abuse in the United States.","PeriodicalId":42977,"journal":{"name":"RELIGION AND AMERICAN CULTURE-A JOURNAL OF INTERPRETATION","volume":"33 1","pages":"1 - 34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RELIGION AND AMERICAN CULTURE-A JOURNAL OF INTERPRETATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/rac.2023.8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT Clergy sexual violence in immigrant communities is an understudied dimension of the sexual abuse crisis in the Roman Catholic church. Yet records suggest that bishops regularly treated immigrant-serving parishes as dumping grounds for serially abusive clergy. There, evidence suggests, abusers targeted minors from poor, vulnerable, and undocumented families, silencing victims with threats of deportation and further violence. How did legal status intersect with structures of state and ecclesial power and with social hierarchies of visibility in situations of clergy abuse? Centering the case of Msgr. Peter E. Garcia, a priest in the Archdiocese of Los Angeles who abused at least twenty boys between 1966 and 1987, this article examines archival evidence from unsealed clergy personnel files to interrogate the complex politics of documentation in the case. It attends to the relationship between three interwoven forms of (un)documentation: first, the precarious legal and social status of victims; second, the silences, redactions, and euphemisms that characterize church records containing these accounts; and third, the spatial undocumentation at work in the use of migrant parishes as clergy dumping grounds. It demonstrates how a post–Vatican II theological and pastoral imagination of intimacy with the poor, refracted through prisms of state, ecclesial, and clerical dominance, helped to create conditions for the production of invisible victims. The erasure accomplished through the overlapping forms of undocumentation in the Garcia case, it argues, can help to account for the absence of such stories from the broader narrative of Catholic clergy sexual abuse in the United States.
移民社区的神职人员性暴力是罗马天主教会性虐待危机中一个未被充分研究的方面。然而,有记录显示,主教们经常把为移民服务的教区视为神职人员滥用职权的垃圾场。有证据表明,在那里,施虐者的目标是来自贫困、弱势和无证家庭的未成年人,以驱逐出境和进一步暴力的威胁让受害者噤声。在神职人员滥用职权的情况下,法律地位如何与国家结构和教会权力以及可见性的社会等级相交叉?本文以彼得·e·加西亚主教(msgr Peter E. Garcia)的案件为中心,他是洛杉矶大主教管区的一名牧师,在1966年至1987年期间性侵了至少20名男孩。本文研究了未密封的神职人员人事档案中的档案证据,以讯问案件中复杂的文件政治。它关注三种相互交织的文件形式之间的关系:首先,受害者不稳定的法律和社会地位;其次,包含这些记录的教会记录的沉默、涂改和委婉语;第三,将移民教区用作神职人员倾倒垃圾的场所,这是空间上的无文件记录。它展示了梵蒂冈二世之后,通过国家、教会和神职统治的棱镜折射出的与穷人亲密关系的神学和牧区想象,如何帮助创造了制造隐形受害者的条件。它认为,加西亚案中通过重叠形式的无文件记录来完成的抹除,可以帮助解释为什么在美国天主教神职人员性虐待的更广泛叙述中没有这样的故事。
期刊介绍:
Religion and American Culture is devoted to promoting the ongoing scholarly discussion of the nature, terms, and dynamics of religion in America. Embracing a diversity of methodological approaches and theoretical perspectives, this semiannual publication explores the interplay between religion and other spheres of American culture. Although concentrated on specific topics, articles illuminate larger patterns, implications, or contexts of American life. Edited by Philip Goff, Stephen Stein, and Peter Thuesen.