A General Architecture for a Trustworthy Creditworthiness-Assessment Platform in the Financial Domain

Giandomenico Cornacchia, V. W. Anelli, F. Narducci, A. Ragone, E. Sciascio
{"title":"A General Architecture for a Trustworthy Creditworthiness-Assessment Platform in the Financial Domain","authors":"Giandomenico Cornacchia, V. W. Anelli, F. Narducci, A. Ragone, E. Sciascio","doi":"10.33166/aetic.2023.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The financial domain is making huge advancements thanks to the exploitation of artificial intelligence. As an example, the credit-worthiness-assessment task is now strongly based on Machine Learning algorithms that make decisions independently from humans. Several studies showed remarkable improvement in reliability, customer care, and return on investment. Nonetheless, many users remain sceptical since they perceive the whole as only partially transparent. The trust in the system decision, the guarantee of fairness in the decision-making process, the explanation of the reasons behind the decision are just some of the open challenges for this task. Moreover, from the financial institution's perspective, another compelling problem is credit-repayment monitoring. Even here, traditional models (e.g., credit scorecards) and machine learning models can help the financial institution in identifying, at an early stage, customers that will fall into default on payments. The monitoring task is critical for the debt-repayment success of identifying bad debtors or simply users who are momentarily in difficulty. The financial institution can thus prevent possible defaults and, if possible, meet the debtor's needs. In this work, the authors propose an architecture for a Creditworthiness-Assessment duty that can meet the transparency needs of the customers while monitoring the credit-repayment risk. This preliminary study carried out an experimental evaluation of the component devoted to the credit-score computation and monitoring credit repayments. The study shows that the authors’ architecture can be an effective tool to improve current Credit-scoring systems. Combining a static and a subsequent dynamic approach can correct mistakes made in the first phase and foil possible false positives for good creditors.","PeriodicalId":36440,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Emerging Technologies in Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Emerging Technologies in Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33166/aetic.2023.02.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The financial domain is making huge advancements thanks to the exploitation of artificial intelligence. As an example, the credit-worthiness-assessment task is now strongly based on Machine Learning algorithms that make decisions independently from humans. Several studies showed remarkable improvement in reliability, customer care, and return on investment. Nonetheless, many users remain sceptical since they perceive the whole as only partially transparent. The trust in the system decision, the guarantee of fairness in the decision-making process, the explanation of the reasons behind the decision are just some of the open challenges for this task. Moreover, from the financial institution's perspective, another compelling problem is credit-repayment monitoring. Even here, traditional models (e.g., credit scorecards) and machine learning models can help the financial institution in identifying, at an early stage, customers that will fall into default on payments. The monitoring task is critical for the debt-repayment success of identifying bad debtors or simply users who are momentarily in difficulty. The financial institution can thus prevent possible defaults and, if possible, meet the debtor's needs. In this work, the authors propose an architecture for a Creditworthiness-Assessment duty that can meet the transparency needs of the customers while monitoring the credit-repayment risk. This preliminary study carried out an experimental evaluation of the component devoted to the credit-score computation and monitoring credit repayments. The study shows that the authors’ architecture can be an effective tool to improve current Credit-scoring systems. Combining a static and a subsequent dynamic approach can correct mistakes made in the first phase and foil possible false positives for good creditors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金融领域可信信用评估平台的通用架构
由于人工智能的开发,金融领域正在取得巨大进步。例如,信用评估任务现在强烈基于机器学习算法,该算法独立于人类做出决策。几项研究表明,在可靠性、客户关怀和投资回报方面都有显著改善。尽管如此,许多用户仍然持怀疑态度,因为他们认为整体只是部分透明。对系统决策的信任、对决策过程公平性的保证、对决策背后原因的解释只是这项任务面临的一些公开挑战。此外,从金融机构的角度来看,另一个令人信服的问题是信贷还款监控。即使在这里,传统模型(如信用卡)和机器学习模型也可以帮助金融机构在早期识别将拖欠付款的客户。监控任务对于识别不良债务人或暂时陷入困境的用户的债务偿还成功至关重要。因此,金融机构可以防止可能的违约,并在可能的情况下满足债务人的需求。在这项工作中,作者提出了一种信用评估职责的架构,该架构可以在监控信贷偿还风险的同时满足客户的透明度需求。这项初步研究对专门用于信用评分计算和监测信贷还款的组成部分进行了实验评估。研究表明,作者的体系结构可以成为改进当前信用评分系统的有效工具。将静态方法和随后的动态方法相结合,可以纠正第一阶段犯下的错误,并为良好的债权人消除可能的误报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Emerging Technologies in Computing
Annals of Emerging Technologies in Computing Computer Science-Computer Science (all)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
The Proposal of Countermeasures for DeepFake Voices on Social Media Considering Waveform and Text Embedding Lightweight Model for Occlusion Removal from Face Images A Torpor-based Enhanced Security Model for CSMA/CA Protocol in Wireless Networks Enhancing Robot Navigation Efficiency Using Cellular Automata with Active Cells Wildfire Prediction in the United States Using Time Series Forecasting Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1