A corpus-based search for machine translationese in terms of discourse coherence

IF 1 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Across Languages and Cultures Pub Date : 2022-11-07 DOI:10.1556/084.2022.00182
Yue Jiang, Jiang Niu
{"title":"A corpus-based search for machine translationese in terms of discourse coherence","authors":"Yue Jiang, Jiang Niu","doi":"10.1556/084.2022.00182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Earlier studies have corroborated that human translation exhibits unique linguistic features, usually referred to as translationese. However, research on machine translationese, in spite of some sparse efforts, is still in its infancy. By comparing machine translation with human translation and original target language texts, this study aims to investigate if machine translation has unique linguistic features of its own too, to what extent machine translations are different from human translations and target-language originals, and what characteristics are typical of machine translations. To this end, we collected a corpus containing English translations of modern Chinese literary texts produced by neural machine translation systems and human professional translators and comparable original texts in the target language. Based on the corpus, a quantitative study of discourse coherence was conducted by observing metrics in three dimensions borrowed from Coh-Metrix, including connectives, latent semantic analysis and the situation/mental model. The results support the existence of translationese in both human and machine translations when they are compared with original texts. However, machine translationese is not the same as human translationese in some metrics of discourse coherence. Additionally, machine translation systems, such as Google and DeepL, when compared with each other, show unique features in some coherence metrics, although on the whole they are not significantly different from each other in those coherence metrics.","PeriodicalId":44202,"journal":{"name":"Across Languages and Cultures","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Across Languages and Cultures","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/084.2022.00182","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Earlier studies have corroborated that human translation exhibits unique linguistic features, usually referred to as translationese. However, research on machine translationese, in spite of some sparse efforts, is still in its infancy. By comparing machine translation with human translation and original target language texts, this study aims to investigate if machine translation has unique linguistic features of its own too, to what extent machine translations are different from human translations and target-language originals, and what characteristics are typical of machine translations. To this end, we collected a corpus containing English translations of modern Chinese literary texts produced by neural machine translation systems and human professional translators and comparable original texts in the target language. Based on the corpus, a quantitative study of discourse coherence was conducted by observing metrics in three dimensions borrowed from Coh-Metrix, including connectives, latent semantic analysis and the situation/mental model. The results support the existence of translationese in both human and machine translations when they are compared with original texts. However, machine translationese is not the same as human translationese in some metrics of discourse coherence. Additionally, machine translation systems, such as Google and DeepL, when compared with each other, show unique features in some coherence metrics, although on the whole they are not significantly different from each other in those coherence metrics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于语料库的机器翻译语篇连贯搜索
早期的研究证实,人类翻译表现出独特的语言特征,通常被称为翻译语言。然而,机器翻译的研究,尽管一些稀疏的努力,仍处于起步阶段。本研究通过对比机器翻译与人类翻译和目的语原文,探讨机器翻译是否也有自己独特的语言特征,机器翻译与人类翻译和目的语原文有什么不同,机器翻译有哪些典型的特征。为此,我们收集了一个语料库,其中包含由神经机器翻译系统和人类专业翻译人员产生的中国现代文学文本的英文翻译,以及目标语言的可比原文。以语料库为基础,借鉴Coh-Metrix理论,从连接词、潜在语义分析和情境/心理模型三个维度对语篇连贯进行了定量研究。研究结果表明,无论是人工翻译还是机器翻译,都存在翻译语段。然而,机器翻译与人类翻译在某些语篇连贯指标上并不相同。此外,谷歌和DeepL等机器翻译系统在某些相干指标上相互比较时显示出独特的特征,尽管它们在这些相干指标上总体上没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Across Languages and Cultures publishes original articles and reviews on all sub-disciplines of Translation and Interpreting (T/I) Studies: general T/I theory, descriptive T/I studies and applied T/I studies. Special emphasis is laid on the questions of multilingualism, language policy and translation policy. Publications on new research methods and models are encouraged. Publishes book reviews, news, announcements and advertisements.
期刊最新文献
Agenda-setting and journalistic translation: The New York Times in English, Spanish and Chinese Exploring the relevance and relative importance of interpreting aptitude constructs and their underlying factors: A data-driven tripartite investigation ‘Islamic State’ in Translation A literary translation in the making: A process-oriented perspective Beyond singability: A descriptive-explanatory analysis of Polish translations of Frank Sinatra's My Way
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1