Theatrical manipulation and seductive sentimentality: constructions of empathy in Swedish online far-right discourse about EU-migrants

IF 1.2 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Emotions and Society Pub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI:10.1332/263168919x15670063481536
Karl Malmqvist
{"title":"Theatrical manipulation and seductive sentimentality: constructions of empathy in Swedish online far-right discourse about EU-migrants","authors":"Karl Malmqvist","doi":"10.1332/263168919x15670063481536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital technologies such as online forums afford opportunities for users to circumvent and challenge feeling rules. The online far-right uses such opportunities to challenge feeling rules regarding racialised minority groups, refugees and immigrants, including rules about empathy for\n such groups. However, while the disruptive features of online far-right practice are widely acknowledged, less has been written about how participants in online far-right forums actually make sense of emotional experiences, including empathy in relation to migrants. This article analyses a\n Swedish far-right-dominated online discussion thread about non-Swedish EU citizens who ask for money, a group referred to in Sweden as ‘EU-migrants’. From an affective-discursive practice perspective, and focusing on metaphorically constructed interpretative repertoires, the article\n analyses how participants in the thread make sense of empathy as an actual or possible emotional response to these migrants, as well as how the participants position themselves as subjects in relation to such experiences and various actors involved. The results indicate that the participants\n are formulating a dual affective-discursive position. First, they present themselves as especially capable of empathic resonance and mirroring, but as righteously angered by EU-migrants’ putative attempts to manipulate this empathic capacity. Second, they disidentify with ‘Swedes’\n by presenting themselves as capable of avoiding the seductive and sentimental ‘kindness narcomania’ supposedly deeply rooted in Swedish society, and thereby present themselves as a (counter-)empathic vanguard community in relation to this society. The implications of such affective-discursive\n practices for far-right online and offline action are discussed.","PeriodicalId":29742,"journal":{"name":"Emotions and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1332/263168919x15670063481536","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emotions and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/263168919x15670063481536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Digital technologies such as online forums afford opportunities for users to circumvent and challenge feeling rules. The online far-right uses such opportunities to challenge feeling rules regarding racialised minority groups, refugees and immigrants, including rules about empathy for such groups. However, while the disruptive features of online far-right practice are widely acknowledged, less has been written about how participants in online far-right forums actually make sense of emotional experiences, including empathy in relation to migrants. This article analyses a Swedish far-right-dominated online discussion thread about non-Swedish EU citizens who ask for money, a group referred to in Sweden as ‘EU-migrants’. From an affective-discursive practice perspective, and focusing on metaphorically constructed interpretative repertoires, the article analyses how participants in the thread make sense of empathy as an actual or possible emotional response to these migrants, as well as how the participants position themselves as subjects in relation to such experiences and various actors involved. The results indicate that the participants are formulating a dual affective-discursive position. First, they present themselves as especially capable of empathic resonance and mirroring, but as righteously angered by EU-migrants’ putative attempts to manipulate this empathic capacity. Second, they disidentify with ‘Swedes’ by presenting themselves as capable of avoiding the seductive and sentimental ‘kindness narcomania’ supposedly deeply rooted in Swedish society, and thereby present themselves as a (counter-)empathic vanguard community in relation to this society. The implications of such affective-discursive practices for far-right online and offline action are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
戏剧操纵和诱人的多愁善感:瑞典网上极右翼关于欧盟移民的话语中的同理心建构
在线论坛等数字技术为用户提供了规避和挑战感觉规则的机会。网络极右翼利用这些机会挑战有关种族化的少数群体、难民和移民的情感规则,包括对这些群体的同情规则。然而,尽管网络极右翼实践的破坏性特征得到了广泛认可,但关于在线极右翼论坛的参与者如何真正理解情感体验(包括与移民有关的同理心)的文章却很少。这篇文章分析了瑞典极右翼主导的一个关于非瑞典籍欧盟公民要钱的在线讨论线程,这个群体在瑞典被称为“欧盟移民”。本文从情感话语实践的角度出发,聚焦于隐喻构建的解释性剧目,分析了线索中的参与者如何将移情理解为对这些移民的实际或可能的情感反应,以及参与者如何将自己定位为与这些经历和各种参与者相关的主体。结果表明,参与者正在形成情感-话语的双重立场。首先,他们表现出自己特别有同理心共鸣和镜像能力,但理所当然地对欧盟移民试图操纵这种同理心能力感到愤怒。其次,他们不认同“瑞典人”,表现出自己有能力避免诱惑和多愁善感的“善良吸毒癖”,这种“善良吸毒癖”被认为深深植根于瑞典社会,因此,他们表现出自己是一个与这个社会相关的(反)共情先锋群体。讨论了这种对极右翼在线和离线行动的情感话语实践的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Courtroom Ethnography: Exploring Contemporary Approaches, Fieldwork and Challenges by Lisa Flower and Sarah Klosterkamp (eds) (2023) The politics of joy under semi-authoritarianism: the trajectory of joyous struggles in a protest cycle in Hong Kong Emotionalising hope in times of climate change Crisis and the Culture of Fear and Anxiety in Contemporary Europe by Carmen Zamorano Llena, Jonas Stier and Billy Gray (eds) (2024) ‘Where are you from?’ The affective and emotional dimensions of an ambiguous event of everyday racism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1