Thematic Agenda on Twitter in the 2019 European Parliament Elections: A Comparative Study Between ‘Spitzenkandidaten’ and National Candidates

IF 0.5 Q4 COMMUNICATION Tripodos Pub Date : 2020-12-20 DOI:10.51698/TRIPODOS.2020.49P29-49
R. Rivas-de-Roca, M. García-Gordillo
{"title":"Thematic Agenda on Twitter in the 2019 European Parliament Elections: A Comparative Study Between ‘Spitzenkandidaten’ and National Candidates","authors":"R. Rivas-de-Roca, M. García-Gordillo","doi":"10.51698/TRIPODOS.2020.49P29-49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The representativeness of the European Parliament has usually been a subject of controversy which is currently enhanced by Brexit and the development of several populist movements within the EU. In this context, the elections to the European Parliament in 2019 were the second time in which the Spitzenkandidaten system was applied. Bearing this in mind, the objective of this research is to know the thematic agenda set by these transnational candidates on Twitter, trying to find differences with the issues raised by the traditional national leaders. To this end, the technique of quantitative content analysis is used, referring to the issues addressed on Twitter by the six candidates to chair the Commission, as well as the thematic agenda expressed by a selection of the national candidates. The sample includes politicians from the four most populated countries of the Union: Germany, France, Italy and Spain. The results show a more thematically concentrated agenda in the Spitzenkandidaten than in national candidates. Therefore, the European elections seem to move on two levels: the national, in which the candidates by countries confront national issues, and the transnational, in which the Spitzenkandidaten address topics from a European approach, together with references to domestic policy.","PeriodicalId":44263,"journal":{"name":"Tripodos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tripodos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51698/TRIPODOS.2020.49P29-49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The representativeness of the European Parliament has usually been a subject of controversy which is currently enhanced by Brexit and the development of several populist movements within the EU. In this context, the elections to the European Parliament in 2019 were the second time in which the Spitzenkandidaten system was applied. Bearing this in mind, the objective of this research is to know the thematic agenda set by these transnational candidates on Twitter, trying to find differences with the issues raised by the traditional national leaders. To this end, the technique of quantitative content analysis is used, referring to the issues addressed on Twitter by the six candidates to chair the Commission, as well as the thematic agenda expressed by a selection of the national candidates. The sample includes politicians from the four most populated countries of the Union: Germany, France, Italy and Spain. The results show a more thematically concentrated agenda in the Spitzenkandidaten than in national candidates. Therefore, the European elections seem to move on two levels: the national, in which the candidates by countries confront national issues, and the transnational, in which the Spitzenkandidaten address topics from a European approach, together with references to domestic policy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019年欧洲议会选举推特主题议程:“Spitzenkandidaten”与国家候选人的比较研究
欧洲议会的代表性通常是一个有争议的话题,目前英国脱欧和欧盟内部几个民粹主义运动的发展加剧了这一争议。在这种背景下,2019年的欧洲议会选举是第二次采用斯皮岑候选人制度。考虑到这一点,本研究的目的是了解这些跨国候选人在Twitter上设定的主题议程,试图找到与传统国家领导人提出的问题的差异。为此目的,采用了定量内容分析的方法,指的是六名委员会主席候选人在推特上讨论的问题,以及选出的国家候选人所表达的主题议程。样本包括来自欧盟人口最多的四个国家的政治家:德国、法国、意大利和西班牙。结果显示,与全国候选人相比,斯皮岑候选人的议程在主题上更为集中。因此,欧洲选举似乎在两个层面上进行:国家层面,各国的候选人面对国家问题;跨国层面,spitzenen候选人从欧洲的角度解决问题,同时提到国内政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tripodos
Tripodos COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence in the Social Science Area: Systematic Literature Review in Web of Science and Scopus The Influence of AI in the Media Work Force: How Companies Use an Array of Legal Remedies AI Implementation Strategies in the Spanish Press Media: Organizational Dynamics, Application Flows, Uses and Future Trends The Presence and Promotion of Foods and Beverages in the YouTube Channels of The World’s Most Influential Kid Ps: A Comparative Study Between the United States and Spain influence of personal space occupation and on the consumer’s psychological status and effective communication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1