In varietate concordia?! Political parties’ digital political marketing in the 2019 European Parliament election campaign

IF 2.9 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE European Union Politics Pub Date : 2021-09-08 DOI:10.1177/14651165211040728
S. Kruschinski, M. Bene
{"title":"In varietate concordia?! Political parties’ digital political marketing in the 2019 European Parliament election campaign","authors":"S. Kruschinski, M. Bene","doi":"10.1177/14651165211040728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article provides the first comprehensive analysis of how parties across 28 countries use digital political marketing on Facebook by drawing on the example of the 2019 European Parliament election. We introduce a theoretical model of political Facebook marketing and compare the paid media activity (sponsored posts, ads) of 186 parties to their owned media (posts) and earned media (user reactions, comments, shares). Our results concerning cross-country patterns indicate that differences in European parties’ paid media activity exist and only a few parties leverage sophisticated targeting strategies. Regarding temporal dynamics, we find that paid media is used to supplement owned media during similar campaign phases. In terms of engagement-triggering effects, we show that sponsoring posts is a suitable tool to increase earned media. Overall, paid media activity on Facebook is largely embedded into parties’ overall marketing strategy and national countries’ regulatory settings. Our results have implications for the understanding of public opinion, voting behaviour and the regulations of elections in modern European democracies.","PeriodicalId":12077,"journal":{"name":"European Union Politics","volume":"23 1","pages":"43 - 65"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Union Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165211040728","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This article provides the first comprehensive analysis of how parties across 28 countries use digital political marketing on Facebook by drawing on the example of the 2019 European Parliament election. We introduce a theoretical model of political Facebook marketing and compare the paid media activity (sponsored posts, ads) of 186 parties to their owned media (posts) and earned media (user reactions, comments, shares). Our results concerning cross-country patterns indicate that differences in European parties’ paid media activity exist and only a few parties leverage sophisticated targeting strategies. Regarding temporal dynamics, we find that paid media is used to supplement owned media during similar campaign phases. In terms of engagement-triggering effects, we show that sponsoring posts is a suitable tool to increase earned media. Overall, paid media activity on Facebook is largely embedded into parties’ overall marketing strategy and national countries’ regulatory settings. Our results have implications for the understanding of public opinion, voting behaviour and the regulations of elections in modern European democracies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在多样化的康考迪亚?!政党在2019年欧洲议会选举中的数字政治营销
本文以2019年欧洲议会选举为例,首次全面分析了28个国家的政党如何在Facebook上使用数字政治营销。我们引入了一个政治Facebook营销的理论模型,并将186个政党的付费媒体活动(赞助帖子、广告)与他们自己的媒体(帖子)和挣得媒体(用户反应、评论、分享)进行了比较。我们关于跨国模式的研究结果表明,欧洲政党的付费媒体活动存在差异,只有少数政党利用复杂的目标策略。在时间动态方面,我们发现在类似的竞选阶段,付费媒体被用来补充自有媒体。在参与触发效应方面,我们表明赞助帖子是增加赚取媒体的合适工具。总的来说,Facebook上的付费媒体活动在很大程度上嵌入了各方的整体营销策略和各国的监管环境中。我们的研究结果对理解现代欧洲民主国家的公众舆论、投票行为和选举规则具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Union Politics
European Union Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
21.70%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: European Union Politics is an international academic journal for advanced peer-reviewed research and scholarship on all aspects of the process of government, politics and policy in the European Union. It aims to stimulate debate and provide a forum to bridge the theoretical and empirical analysis on the political unification of Europe. It represents no particular school or approach, nor is it wedded to any particular methodology. In particular it welcomes articles that offer a new theoretical argument, analyze original data in a novel fashion or present an innovative methodological approach. The Editors invite submissions from all sub-fields of contemporary political science, including international relations, comparative politics, public administration, public policy and political theory.
期刊最新文献
The Eurodisappointed: On the disenchantment with the EU's limited response to democratic backsliding Europe around the corner? How border proximity and quality of government explains European identity Free to move, reluctant to share: Unequal opposition to transnational rights under the EU's free movement principle The EU Commission: Supplying enforcement and demanding compliance Mission partly accomplished: European Union Politics at 25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1