The User Experience Framework for Health Interventions

IF 0.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Nordic Psychology Pub Date : 2022-01-11 DOI:10.1080/19012276.2021.2004917
Lene E. Søvold, Ole André Solbakken
{"title":"The User Experience Framework for Health Interventions","authors":"Lene E. Søvold, Ole André Solbakken","doi":"10.1080/19012276.2021.2004917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Traditionally, a great part of the research related to the patient or user experience within clinical contexts, has only been exploring the user experience indirectly—or it has only been exploring some elements or aspects of the overall user experience. The purpose of this review is to investigate which aspects of the user experience are typically explored in the research literature and to shed light on the multifaceted nature of the user experience. We conducted a two-phase review of earlier research, consisting of a brief narrative review and a scoping review, exploring users’ experiences with therapeutic health interventions in both indirect and direct ways. Thirty studies, representing several thousands service users, were included in our scoping review. We extracted data related to the different aspects of the user experience covered in the reviewed research through descriptive synthesis. This revealed that a variety of aspects or facets related to the user experience were addressed across the different studies. To further specify these results, we conducted a thematic analysis based on the descriptive data. Through this analysis, we identified five main categories or dimensions relevant to the user experience with therapeutic interventions: 1) Perception of self as patient/user, 2) Perception of the therapist/intervention provider, 3) Perception of the therapeutic relationship/alliance, 4) Perception of the intervention/modality and 5) Perception of contextual factors. Based on this finding, we propose an user experience framework centred around these five domains. For each of the domains within the framework, several subordinate facets are also suggested based on our synthesis and analysis of the reviewed literature as well as clinical relevance. The proposed framework can be used to help understand, evaluate and promote users’ experiences with health interventions across user groups, interventions and contexts. Our framework highlights the multifaceted nature of the user experience, and the importance of considering all the different dimensions and facets of this experience in an integrative way both in research designs, health policy development and when implementing and evaluating health interventions in clinical contexts.","PeriodicalId":51815,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2021.2004917","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Traditionally, a great part of the research related to the patient or user experience within clinical contexts, has only been exploring the user experience indirectly—or it has only been exploring some elements or aspects of the overall user experience. The purpose of this review is to investigate which aspects of the user experience are typically explored in the research literature and to shed light on the multifaceted nature of the user experience. We conducted a two-phase review of earlier research, consisting of a brief narrative review and a scoping review, exploring users’ experiences with therapeutic health interventions in both indirect and direct ways. Thirty studies, representing several thousands service users, were included in our scoping review. We extracted data related to the different aspects of the user experience covered in the reviewed research through descriptive synthesis. This revealed that a variety of aspects or facets related to the user experience were addressed across the different studies. To further specify these results, we conducted a thematic analysis based on the descriptive data. Through this analysis, we identified five main categories or dimensions relevant to the user experience with therapeutic interventions: 1) Perception of self as patient/user, 2) Perception of the therapist/intervention provider, 3) Perception of the therapeutic relationship/alliance, 4) Perception of the intervention/modality and 5) Perception of contextual factors. Based on this finding, we propose an user experience framework centred around these five domains. For each of the domains within the framework, several subordinate facets are also suggested based on our synthesis and analysis of the reviewed literature as well as clinical relevance. The proposed framework can be used to help understand, evaluate and promote users’ experiences with health interventions across user groups, interventions and contexts. Our framework highlights the multifaceted nature of the user experience, and the importance of considering all the different dimensions and facets of this experience in an integrative way both in research designs, health policy development and when implementing and evaluating health interventions in clinical contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫生干预措施的用户体验框架
传统上,大部分与临床环境下的患者或用户体验相关的研究,只是间接地探索了用户体验,或者只是探索了整体用户体验的某些元素或方面。这篇综述的目的是调查用户体验的哪些方面通常在研究文献中被探索,并阐明用户体验的多面性。我们对早期的研究进行了两阶段的审查,包括简短的叙述审查和范围审查,以间接和直接的方式探索用户对治疗性健康干预的体验。30项研究,代表了数千名服务用户,纳入了我们的范围审查。我们通过描述性综合提取与所审查研究中涵盖的用户体验的不同方面相关的数据。这表明在不同的研究中涉及了与用户体验相关的各种方面。为了进一步明确这些结果,我们在描述性数据的基础上进行了专题分析。通过这一分析,我们确定了与治疗干预的用户体验相关的五个主要类别或维度:1)作为患者/用户的自我感知,2)治疗师/干预提供者的感知,3)治疗关系/联盟的感知,4)干预/方式的感知,5)情境因素的感知。基于这一发现,我们提出了一个围绕这五个领域的用户体验框架。对于框架内的每个领域,根据我们对综述文献以及临床相关性的综合和分析,还提出了几个从属方面。拟议的框架可用于帮助了解、评价和促进用户对跨用户群体、干预措施和背景的卫生干预措施的体验。我们的框架强调了用户体验的多面性,以及在研究设计、卫生政策制定以及在临床环境中实施和评估卫生干预措施时以综合方式考虑这种体验的所有不同维度和方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nordic Psychology
Nordic Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Disclosures and social reactions to sexual violence: factor structure of the social reactions questionnaire shortened and sex differences in Iceland With a little coping from my friends: a case study of voice, manager response and collective coping in an organisational context Persistent physical symptoms and mental health problems among individuals seeking work rehabilitation A good enough grip on life in youth To work after retirement: a qualitative study among mental health nursing assistants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1