Rejecting abyssal thinking in the language and education of racialized bilinguals: A manifesto

Ofelia García, N. Flores, K. Seltzer, Li Wei, Ricardo Otheguy, J. Rosa
{"title":"Rejecting abyssal thinking in the language and education of racialized bilinguals: A manifesto","authors":"Ofelia García, N. Flores, K. Seltzer, Li Wei, Ricardo Otheguy, J. Rosa","doi":"10.1080/15427587.2021.1935957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Following Boaventura de Sousa Santos, the authors of this article reject the type of “abyssal thinking” that erases the existence of counter-hegemonic knowledges and lifeways, adopting instead the “from the inside out” perspective that is required for thinking constructively about the language and education of racialized bilinguals. On the basis of deep personal experience and extensive field-work research, we challenge prevailing assumptions about language, bilingualism, and education that are based on raciolinguistic ideologies with roots in colonialism. Adopting a translanguaging perspective that rejects rigid colonial boundaries of named languages, we argue that racialized bilingual learners, like all students, draw from linguistic-semiotic, cultural, and historical repertoires. The decolonial approach that guides our work reveals these students making a world by means of cultural and linguistic practices derived from their own knowledge systems. We propose that in order to attain justice and success, a decolonial education must center non-hegemonic modes of “otherwise thinking” by attending to racialized bilinguals’ knowledges and abilities that have always existed yet have continually been distorted and erased through abyssal thinking.","PeriodicalId":53706,"journal":{"name":"Critical Inquiry in Language Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"140","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Inquiry in Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2021.1935957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 140

Abstract

ABSTRACT Following Boaventura de Sousa Santos, the authors of this article reject the type of “abyssal thinking” that erases the existence of counter-hegemonic knowledges and lifeways, adopting instead the “from the inside out” perspective that is required for thinking constructively about the language and education of racialized bilinguals. On the basis of deep personal experience and extensive field-work research, we challenge prevailing assumptions about language, bilingualism, and education that are based on raciolinguistic ideologies with roots in colonialism. Adopting a translanguaging perspective that rejects rigid colonial boundaries of named languages, we argue that racialized bilingual learners, like all students, draw from linguistic-semiotic, cultural, and historical repertoires. The decolonial approach that guides our work reveals these students making a world by means of cultural and linguistic practices derived from their own knowledge systems. We propose that in order to attain justice and success, a decolonial education must center non-hegemonic modes of “otherwise thinking” by attending to racialized bilinguals’ knowledges and abilities that have always existed yet have continually been distorted and erased through abyssal thinking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拒绝种族化双语者语言和教育中的糟糕思维:一份宣言
继Boaventura de Sousa Santos之后,本文作者拒绝了抹掉反霸权知识和生活方式存在的“深渊思维”类型,而是采用了建设性地思考种族化双语者的语言和教育所需要的“由内而外”的视角。基于深刻的个人经验和广泛的实地工作研究,我们挑战基于殖民主义的种族语言意识形态的关于语言、双语和教育的普遍假设。采用跨语言的观点,拒绝命名语言的严格殖民边界,我们认为种族化的双语学习者,像所有学生一样,从语言符号学,文化和历史的技能中汲取灵感。指导我们工作的非殖民化方法揭示了这些学生通过源自他们自己知识体系的文化和语言实践来创造世界。我们建议,为了获得正义和成功,非殖民化的教育必须以非霸权的“其他思维”模式为中心,通过关注种族化的双语者的知识和能力,这些知识和能力一直存在,但却不断被深邃的思维扭曲和抹去。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Inquiry in Language Studies
Critical Inquiry in Language Studies Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Perspectives on translanguaging in education in the global south Translingual crossings: an enactive-performative approach to a pedagogical guide for the teaching of Portuguese as a welcoming language to children English academic writing for academic purposes and beyond: the experiences of undergraduate students in Hong Kong Positive vibrations – voice, sound, and resonance as insurgency English language proficiencies – recasting disciplinary and pedagogic sensibilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1