A Cross-Cultural Investigation on Consumer Responses to Failures of Domestic and Foreign Products

R. Gao
{"title":"A Cross-Cultural Investigation on Consumer Responses to Failures of Domestic and Foreign Products","authors":"R. Gao","doi":"10.1080/08961530.2022.2150734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This research examines how consumer ethnocentrism (CET) and product failure type affect consumers’ attitudes toward domestic and imported product failures. It also explores product failure’s impacts on country-of-origin (COO) image, and cultural difference in product failure tolerance. Two experiments in the U.S. and China were conducted. Hypotheses were tested using both regressions and structural equation modeling analyses. Findings include, first, CET affects attitudes toward product failures; second, failure type has both main and moderating effects; third, COO image fluctuates with failure experience, regardless of failure type and product origin (domestic or imported); and finally, Chinese consumers are more failure tolerant than U.S. consumers. Theoretically, as the first study, this research differentiates two product failure types (competence versus ethical) and confirms that failure type has both main and moderating effects on attitudes. It also extends the scope of CET’s predictive power by empirically confirming that CET can affect attitudes toward products even with failures. Managerially, more effort is needed in handling ethical than competence failures. When a firm’s product fails, other firms from the same country should react proactively. If a product fails in both the U.S. and Chinese markets, more recovery efforts should be invested in the U.S. market.","PeriodicalId":47051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Consumer Marketing","volume":"35 1","pages":"502 - 525"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Consumer Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2022.2150734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This research examines how consumer ethnocentrism (CET) and product failure type affect consumers’ attitudes toward domestic and imported product failures. It also explores product failure’s impacts on country-of-origin (COO) image, and cultural difference in product failure tolerance. Two experiments in the U.S. and China were conducted. Hypotheses were tested using both regressions and structural equation modeling analyses. Findings include, first, CET affects attitudes toward product failures; second, failure type has both main and moderating effects; third, COO image fluctuates with failure experience, regardless of failure type and product origin (domestic or imported); and finally, Chinese consumers are more failure tolerant than U.S. consumers. Theoretically, as the first study, this research differentiates two product failure types (competence versus ethical) and confirms that failure type has both main and moderating effects on attitudes. It also extends the scope of CET’s predictive power by empirically confirming that CET can affect attitudes toward products even with failures. Managerially, more effort is needed in handling ethical than competence failures. When a firm’s product fails, other firms from the same country should react proactively. If a product fails in both the U.S. and Chinese markets, more recovery efforts should be invested in the U.S. market.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消费者对国内外产品失败反应的跨文化研究
摘要本研究探讨消费者民族中心主义(CET)和产品失效类型如何影响消费者对国产和进口产品失效的态度。本文还探讨了产品失效对原产国(COO)形象的影响,以及文化差异对产品失效容忍度的影响。在美国和中国进行了两个实验。采用回归和结构方程模型分析对假设进行检验。研究结果包括:第一,CET影响对产品失败的态度;②失效类型既有主要作用,也有调节作用;第三,无论故障类型和产品来源(国产还是进口)如何,COO形象都会随着故障经历而波动;最后,中国消费者比美国消费者更能容忍失败。从理论上讲,作为第一项研究,本研究区分了两种产品失效类型(能力与道德),并证实了失效类型对态度既有主要影响,也有调节作用。它还扩展了CET的预测能力的范围,通过经验证实CET可以影响对产品的态度,即使有失败。在管理上,处理道德失误比处理能力失误更需要付出努力。当一家公司的产品失败时,来自同一国家的其他公司应该积极应对。如果一个产品在美国和中国市场都失败了,就应该在美国市场投入更多的精力来恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The Journal of International Consumer Marketing examines consumer and organizational buyer behavior on a cross-cultural/national and global scale combining up-to-date research with practical applications to help you develop an action plan for successful marketing strategy development. Business professionals, policymakers, and academics share insights and "inside" information on a wide range of cross-cultural marketing issues, including international business customs, negotiating styles, consumer brand loyalty, price sensitivity, purchasing and leasing, consumer satisfaction (and dissatisfaction), and advertising.
期刊最新文献
On the Difference of Mobile Shopping Behavior Between Locals and Expatriates: The Roles of Culture and Perceived Value BAD BLOOD: SECRETS AND LIES IN A SILICON VALLEY STARTUP Boosting Upcycled Value: Evidence from an Emerging Economy Unraveling the Dynamics of Social Media Influencers on Sustainable Purchase Intentions and Environmental Awareness Among People with Disabilities: A Focus on the Moderating Role of Disability Types “I Am Who I Am, But I Am Complicated”: The Mediating Role of Ambivalence on Country of Origin (COO) Between Consumer Self-Positioning and Willingness to Buy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1