Optimal computational parameters for maximum accuracy and minimum cost of Arnoldi-based time-stepping methods for flow global stability analysis

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 MECHANICS Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics Pub Date : 2022-11-06 DOI:10.1007/s00162-022-00634-x
Marlon Sproesser Mathias, Marcello Augusto Faraco de Medeiros
{"title":"Optimal computational parameters for maximum accuracy and minimum cost of Arnoldi-based time-stepping methods for flow global stability analysis","authors":"Marlon Sproesser Mathias,&nbsp;Marcello Augusto Faraco de Medeiros","doi":"10.1007/s00162-022-00634-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Global instability analysis of flows is often performed via time-stepping methods, based on the Arnoldi algorithm. When setting up these methods, several computational parameters must be chosen, which affect intrinsic errors of the procedure, such as the truncation errors, the discretization error of the flow solver, the error associated with the nonlinear terms of the Navier–Stokes equations and the error associated with the limited size of the approximation of the Jacobian matrix. This paper develops theoretical equations for the estimation of optimal balance between accuracy and cost for each case. The 2D open cavity flow is used both for explaining the effect of the parameters on the accuracy and the cost of the solution, and for verifying the quality of the predictions. The equations demonstrate the impact of each parameter on the quality of the solution. For example, if higher-order methods are used for approaching a Fréchet derivative in the procedure, it is shown that the solution deteriorates more rapidly for larger grids or less accurate flow solvers. On the other hand, lower-order approximations are more sensitive to the initial disturbance magnitude. Nevertheless, for accurate flow solvers and moderate grid dimensions, first-order Fréchet derivative approximation with optimal computational parameters can provide 5 decimal place accurate eigenvalues. It is further shown that optimal parameters based on accuracy tend to also lead to the most cost-effective solution. The predictive equations, guidelines and conclusions are general, and, in principle, applicable to any flow, including 3D ones.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":795,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics","volume":"36 6","pages":"1013 - 1036"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00162-022-00634-x.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00162-022-00634-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Global instability analysis of flows is often performed via time-stepping methods, based on the Arnoldi algorithm. When setting up these methods, several computational parameters must be chosen, which affect intrinsic errors of the procedure, such as the truncation errors, the discretization error of the flow solver, the error associated with the nonlinear terms of the Navier–Stokes equations and the error associated with the limited size of the approximation of the Jacobian matrix. This paper develops theoretical equations for the estimation of optimal balance between accuracy and cost for each case. The 2D open cavity flow is used both for explaining the effect of the parameters on the accuracy and the cost of the solution, and for verifying the quality of the predictions. The equations demonstrate the impact of each parameter on the quality of the solution. For example, if higher-order methods are used for approaching a Fréchet derivative in the procedure, it is shown that the solution deteriorates more rapidly for larger grids or less accurate flow solvers. On the other hand, lower-order approximations are more sensitive to the initial disturbance magnitude. Nevertheless, for accurate flow solvers and moderate grid dimensions, first-order Fréchet derivative approximation with optimal computational parameters can provide 5 decimal place accurate eigenvalues. It is further shown that optimal parameters based on accuracy tend to also lead to the most cost-effective solution. The predictive equations, guidelines and conclusions are general, and, in principle, applicable to any flow, including 3D ones.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于arnoldi的流场全局稳定性分析时步法的最优计算参数,以获得最大精度和最小代价
流的全局不稳定性分析通常采用基于Arnoldi算法的时间步进方法进行。在建立这些方法时,必须选择几个计算参数,这些参数会影响过程的固有误差,如截断误差、流动求解器的离散化误差、与Navier-Stokes方程的非线性项有关的误差以及与雅可比矩阵近似的有限大小有关的误差。本文建立了估计每种情况下精度和成本之间最佳平衡的理论方程。二维开腔流动既用于解释参数对解决方案的精度和成本的影响,也用于验证预测的质量。方程展示了每个参数对解质量的影响。例如,如果在程序中使用高阶方法来逼近fracimchet导数,则表明对于较大的网格或较不精确的流求解器,解的退化速度更快。另一方面,低阶近似对初始扰动的大小更为敏感。然而,对于精确的流动求解器和适度的网格尺寸,一阶fracimet导数近似具有最优的计算参数,可以提供小数点后5位的精确特征值。进一步表明,基于精度的最优参数往往也是最经济的解决方案。预测方程、准则和结论具有普遍性,原则上适用于任何流,包括三维流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics provides a forum for the cross fertilization of ideas, tools and techniques across all disciplines in which fluid flow plays a role. The focus is on aspects of fluid dynamics where theory and computation are used to provide insights and data upon which solid physical understanding is revealed. We seek research papers, invited review articles, brief communications, letters and comments addressing flow phenomena of relevance to aeronautical, geophysical, environmental, material, mechanical and life sciences. Papers of a purely algorithmic, experimental or engineering application nature, and papers without significant new physical insights, are outside the scope of this journal. For computational work, authors are responsible for ensuring that any artifacts of discretization and/or implementation are sufficiently controlled such that the numerical results unambiguously support the conclusions drawn. Where appropriate, and to the extent possible, such papers should either include or reference supporting documentation in the form of verification and validation studies.
期刊最新文献
An analytical study of micro-droplet generation in microfluidic double T-junction devices under effects of channel depth ratio using VOF method An analysis of the effect of the jet initial conditions on the wavelet separated near-field acoustic pressure Analyzing particulate behavior in high-speed, high-altitude conditions through an overlay-based computational approach Long wavelength analysis amendment on the cilia beating assisted peristalsis in a tube Wave reflections and resonance in a Mach 0.9 turbulent jet
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1