How We Do the Work Is the Work: Building an Intersectional Queer Praxis for Critical Feminist Scholarship

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences Affilia-Feminist Inquiry in Social Work Pub Date : 2022-12-12 DOI:10.1177/08861099221137561
Gita R. Mehrotra
{"title":"How We Do the Work Is the Work: Building an Intersectional Queer Praxis for Critical Feminist Scholarship","authors":"Gita R. Mehrotra","doi":"10.1177/08861099221137561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this reflection (which is a revised version of a recent keynote address), I invite feminist social work scholars to consider what it might look like to build our scholarship through an intersectional queer praxis. I posit that as critical feminist scholars, it is important that we consider not only the topics we study but also how we do our work. Specifically, I propose an intersectional queer praxis that brings together key tenets of Slow scholarship with queer lived experiences and critical theoretical lens(es) that assert that queer is destabilizing of dominant ideologies and a challenge to normative ways of being. I discuss four interrelated dimensions of intersectional queer praxis that draw upon Slow scholarship and elements of queer life: (1) reimagining time; (2) centering relationships, community care, and collaboration; (3) embracing complexity and disrupting binaries; and (4) attention to embodiment and emotion. I argue that employing this kind of intersectional queer praxis challenges dominant approaches to academic knowledge production and carries with it new possibilities and creative imaginings for how we do our work. This talk is an invitation to think collectively, to reflect, and to raise questions for us as social work scholars as we continue to build a more robust practice of critical feminist scholarship.","PeriodicalId":47277,"journal":{"name":"Affilia-Feminist Inquiry in Social Work","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Affilia-Feminist Inquiry in Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08861099221137561","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this reflection (which is a revised version of a recent keynote address), I invite feminist social work scholars to consider what it might look like to build our scholarship through an intersectional queer praxis. I posit that as critical feminist scholars, it is important that we consider not only the topics we study but also how we do our work. Specifically, I propose an intersectional queer praxis that brings together key tenets of Slow scholarship with queer lived experiences and critical theoretical lens(es) that assert that queer is destabilizing of dominant ideologies and a challenge to normative ways of being. I discuss four interrelated dimensions of intersectional queer praxis that draw upon Slow scholarship and elements of queer life: (1) reimagining time; (2) centering relationships, community care, and collaboration; (3) embracing complexity and disrupting binaries; and (4) attention to embodiment and emotion. I argue that employing this kind of intersectional queer praxis challenges dominant approaches to academic knowledge production and carries with it new possibilities and creative imaginings for how we do our work. This talk is an invitation to think collectively, to reflect, and to raise questions for us as social work scholars as we continue to build a more robust practice of critical feminist scholarship.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们如何做,工作就是工作:为批判性女权主义学术建立一个交叉的酷儿实践
在这篇反思中(这是最近一次主题演讲的修订版),我邀请女权主义社会工作学者考虑通过交叉的酷儿实践来建立我们的学术可能是什么样子。我认为,作为批判性女权主义学者,我们不仅要考虑我们研究的主题,还要考虑我们如何工作,这一点很重要。具体而言,我提出了一种交叉的酷儿实践,将慢学术的关键原则与酷儿的生活经历和批判性理论视角结合在一起,这些理论视角断言酷儿正在破坏主流意识形态的稳定,并挑战规范的存在方式。我讨论了交叉酷儿实践的四个相互关联的维度,这些维度借鉴了Slow学术和酷儿生活的元素:(1)重新想象时间;(2) 以关系、社区关怀和协作为中心;(3) 包含复杂性并破坏二进制;(4)注重体现和情感。我认为,采用这种交叉的酷儿实践挑战了学术知识生产的主导方法,并为我们如何工作带来了新的可能性和创造性的想象。这场演讲邀请我们作为社会工作学者进行集体思考、反思和提出问题,因为我们将继续建立一个更强有力的批判性女权主义学术实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work is dedicated to the discussion and development of feminist values, theories, and knowledge as they relate to social work and social welfare research, education, and practice. The intent of Affilia is to bring insight and knowledge to the task of eliminating discrimination and oppression, especially with respect to gender, race, ethnicity, class, age, disability, and sexual and affectional preference.
期刊最新文献
(In)Consistent Performance Feedback and the Locus of Search. Who Do We Call “Creepy?”: Sex Workers’ Relationships as Targets of Intimate Intervention Social Work in a Post-Dobbs World: The ‘Adoption Fallacy’, Decolonization, and Reproductive Justice Book Review: Working it: Sex workers on the work of sex by Bickers, M., Breshears, P., & Luna, J. The Imposition of a Coerced Autonomy: Suicidal “Bad Girls,” Human Service Professionals, and Gender Bias
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1