The Use of Read, Cover, Remember, Retell (Rcrr) Strategy in Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension Ability

Acuity Pub Date : 2019-07-30 DOI:10.35974/acuity.v4i2.1068
Marlin Steffi Marpaung, Risnawaty Sinaga
{"title":"The Use of Read, Cover, Remember, Retell (Rcrr) Strategy in Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension Ability","authors":"Marlin Steffi Marpaung, Risnawaty Sinaga","doi":"10.35974/acuity.v4i2.1068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reading is one of the important skills in English needed by the second language learner. The purpose of this study is to find out is there a significant difference on students’ reading comprehension through Read, Cover, Remember and Retell (RCRR) strategy. The population were VII grade students of SMPN 10 Cimahi. They were divided into two groups, the experimental and conventional group. The experimental group was taught using RCRR strategy while the conventional group was taught using conventional method. This study used quantitative research method and experimental design by using pre-test and post-test. The study was designed to find out the answer of the following questions: Are the students have same level of ability before the treatment? Is there a significant difference on students’ achievement in reading comprehension between the experimental and conventional group? What is the students’ response toward Read, Cover, Remember and Retell (RCRR) strategy?. The instrument used for this study is reading comprehension test and a questionnaire. The result of this study showed that there was a significant difference on students’ achievement in reading comprehension with mean score of pre-test was 40.27 and mean score of post-test was 73.47. The result of the questionnaire toward the students’ responses was 68% positive. It indicated that students had a positive response toward the RCRR strategy. Furthermore, the suggestion for the English teachers, it is recommended to use RCRR strategy to teach reading comprehension in their classes because it can improve the students’ reading comprehension ability.","PeriodicalId":33744,"journal":{"name":"Acuity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acuity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35974/acuity.v4i2.1068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Reading is one of the important skills in English needed by the second language learner. The purpose of this study is to find out is there a significant difference on students’ reading comprehension through Read, Cover, Remember and Retell (RCRR) strategy. The population were VII grade students of SMPN 10 Cimahi. They were divided into two groups, the experimental and conventional group. The experimental group was taught using RCRR strategy while the conventional group was taught using conventional method. This study used quantitative research method and experimental design by using pre-test and post-test. The study was designed to find out the answer of the following questions: Are the students have same level of ability before the treatment? Is there a significant difference on students’ achievement in reading comprehension between the experimental and conventional group? What is the students’ response toward Read, Cover, Remember and Retell (RCRR) strategy?. The instrument used for this study is reading comprehension test and a questionnaire. The result of this study showed that there was a significant difference on students’ achievement in reading comprehension with mean score of pre-test was 40.27 and mean score of post-test was 73.47. The result of the questionnaire toward the students’ responses was 68% positive. It indicated that students had a positive response toward the RCRR strategy. Furthermore, the suggestion for the English teachers, it is recommended to use RCRR strategy to teach reading comprehension in their classes because it can improve the students’ reading comprehension ability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
读-盖-记-复述策略在提高学生阅读理解能力中的应用
阅读是第二语言学习者所需要的重要英语技能之一。本研究的目的是通过阅读、覆盖、记忆和复述(RCRR)策略来发现学生的阅读理解是否存在显著差异。人口是SMPN 10 Cimahi的七年级学生。他们被分为两组,实验组和常规组。实验组采用RCRR策略进行教学,而常规组采用常规方法进行教学。本研究采用定量研究方法和实验设计,采用前测和后测相结合的方法。本研究旨在找出以下问题的答案:学生在接受治疗前是否具有相同的能力水平?实验组和常规组学生的阅读理解成绩有显著差异吗?学生对阅读、覆盖、记忆和复述(RCRR)策略的反应是什么?。本研究使用的工具是阅读理解测试和问卷调查。研究结果表明,学生的阅读理解成绩存在显著差异,前测平均分为40.27分,后测平均分73.47分。对学生回答的问卷调查结果为68%的积极性。研究表明,学生对RCRR策略有积极的反应。此外,建议英语教师在课堂上使用RCRR策略进行阅读理解教学,因为它可以提高学生的阅读理解能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Cross-National Investigation of Cultural Representations in Iranian and Turkish ELT Coursebooks Longing for Symbolic Capital in Toni Morrison’s The Bluest Eye: A Bourdieun Estimation Age, Gender, and Anxiety as Antecedents of Willingness to Communicate: Turkish EFL Context Learning Styles and Attitude toward Achievement among English Second Language Students The Effect of Using De-contextualization and Semi-Contextualization Teaching Techniques on Turkish EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1