Autolesiones no suicidas y su relación con el estilo de apego en una muestra no clínica de adolescentes chilenos

Jorge Eduardo Leiva Pereira, Ana Matilde Concha Landeros
{"title":"Autolesiones no suicidas y su relación con el estilo de apego en una muestra no clínica de adolescentes chilenos","authors":"Jorge Eduardo Leiva Pereira, Ana Matilde Concha Landeros","doi":"10.22199/S07187475.2019.0001.00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: to establish the relationship between the presence of non-suicidal self-harm with the type of attachment in a sample of Chilean adolescents.  \nMethod: A questionnaire was used to evaluate non-suicidals self-harm (American Psychiatric Association, 2014); and two questionnaires to measure attachment style (Gonzalez & Mendez, 2006; Moran, Lecannelier, & Rodriguez, 2014). A non-experimental, transversal and analytical study was carried out, was used Chi square  for comparisons between the attachment style between those who self-harm and those who do not.  \nResults: 186 adolescents, with ages between 14 and 18 years old (M = 15.8, SD = 1.1), 57% correspond to women. 11% (22) of the subjects reported self-harm, 77.3% corresponded to women.  \nIn subjects reporting with self-harm, 80.9% had an insecure type of attachment (4.8% avoidance attachment, 33.3% ambivalent attachment, and 42.8% disorganized attachment). 95.4% have medium to high scores on subscale signs of anger and anguish towards the figure of attachment.  \nConclusions: Insecure and disorganized attachment styles are a factor of vulnerability that predisposes subjects to emotional deregulation.  \nAdolescents who report self-harm they tend to have less secure attachments, in contrast to those who do not self-harm (Hallab & Covic, 2010).","PeriodicalId":90336,"journal":{"name":"Salud y Sociedad","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Salud y Sociedad","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22199/S07187475.2019.0001.00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: to establish the relationship between the presence of non-suicidal self-harm with the type of attachment in a sample of Chilean adolescents.  Method: A questionnaire was used to evaluate non-suicidals self-harm (American Psychiatric Association, 2014); and two questionnaires to measure attachment style (Gonzalez & Mendez, 2006; Moran, Lecannelier, & Rodriguez, 2014). A non-experimental, transversal and analytical study was carried out, was used Chi square  for comparisons between the attachment style between those who self-harm and those who do not.  Results: 186 adolescents, with ages between 14 and 18 years old (M = 15.8, SD = 1.1), 57% correspond to women. 11% (22) of the subjects reported self-harm, 77.3% corresponded to women.  In subjects reporting with self-harm, 80.9% had an insecure type of attachment (4.8% avoidance attachment, 33.3% ambivalent attachment, and 42.8% disorganized attachment). 95.4% have medium to high scores on subscale signs of anger and anguish towards the figure of attachment.  Conclusions: Insecure and disorganized attachment styles are a factor of vulnerability that predisposes subjects to emotional deregulation.  Adolescents who report self-harm they tend to have less secure attachments, in contrast to those who do not self-harm (Hallab & Covic, 2010).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智利青少年非临床样本的非自杀性自残及其与依恋方式的关系
目的:探讨智利青少年非自杀性自残行为与依恋类型的关系。方法:采用问卷法对非自杀性自残行为进行评估(American Psychiatric Association, 2014);以及测量依恋类型的两份问卷(Gonzalez & Mendez, 2006;Moran, Lecannelier, & Rodriguez, 2014)。我们进行了一项非实验的、横向的和分析性的研究,使用卡方对自残者和不自残者的依恋类型进行比较。结果:青少年186例,年龄14 ~ 18岁(M = 15.8, SD = 1.1),女性占57%。11%(22人)的受试者报告有自残行为,其中77.3%为女性。在自残的被试中,80.9%的被试存在不安全型依恋(4.8%为回避型依恋,33.3%为矛盾型依恋,42.8%为无序型依恋)。95.4%的人在对依恋形象的愤怒和痛苦的子量表上得分中高。结论:不安全和无组织的依恋类型是易受伤害的因素,易导致被试情绪放松。与不自残的青少年相比,自残的青少年往往有更少的安全依恋(Hallab & Covic, 2010)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Medidas desenvolvidas para avaliar os impactos psicológicos da pandemia de COVID-19: uma revisão sistemática da literatura Ciberacoso entre observadores de un colegio de Colombia Percepção da doença e de risco na obesidade: revisão sistemática Autocuidado e cuidado de pessoas com câncer e dispositivos médicos de alimentação Resilience assessment in mexicans diagnosed with HIV
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1