Perkembangan Gerakan Pembebasan Hijaz dan Anti Ibn Saud, 1920-an hingga 1930-an

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION Journal of Al-Tamaddun Pub Date : 2023-06-19 DOI:10.22452/jat.vol18no1.7
Rabiatul Adawiyah Abdullah (Corresponding Author), Abu Hanifah Haris, Zulkanain Abdul Rahman
{"title":"Perkembangan Gerakan Pembebasan Hijaz dan Anti Ibn Saud, 1920-an hingga 1930-an","authors":"Rabiatul Adawiyah Abdullah (Corresponding Author), Abu Hanifah Haris, Zulkanain Abdul Rahman","doi":"10.22452/jat.vol18no1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the development of the Hijaz liberation and anti-Ibn Saud movements from the 1920s to the 1930s. The emergence of three movements for the liberation of Hijaz and anti-Ibn Saud proves that the movement is very significant and anti-Ibn Saud. Therefore, this article is highlighted to examine the early development of the Hijaz liberation movement and the anti-Ibn Saud, namely the Hijaz National Party (HNP), in addition to evaluating the development of the Hijaz liberation movement and the anti-Ibn Saud movement, namely the Ikhwan movement and the Hijaz Liberation Party (HNP). This study uses qualitative methods and library research by analyzing primary and secondary sources. Among the primary sources used are the Foreign Office (FO), Colonial Office (CO) and Political and Secret Department Record (IOR/L/PS) had obtained from The National Archives and the British Library, London. The results of the study found that the emergence of the anti-Ibn Saud movement in the Hijaz appeared after the conquest of the Hijaz by Ibn Saud who sought to dominate the Hijaz through a political and administrative approach. There were three movements that opposed Ibn Saud at that time, namely the Hijaz National Party, the Ikhwan movement and the Hijaz Liberation Party. Nevertheless, the struggle of all these movements eventually failed and was successfully removed by Ibn Saud starting with the banning of the HNP in 1926, followed by the decline of the Brotherhood movement in the early 1930s. The establishment of the state of Saudi Arabia in 1932 succeeded in challenging the HLP struggle leading to the banning of the movement in 1936.","PeriodicalId":40895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Al-Tamaddun","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Al-Tamaddun","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/jat.vol18no1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article discusses the development of the Hijaz liberation and anti-Ibn Saud movements from the 1920s to the 1930s. The emergence of three movements for the liberation of Hijaz and anti-Ibn Saud proves that the movement is very significant and anti-Ibn Saud. Therefore, this article is highlighted to examine the early development of the Hijaz liberation movement and the anti-Ibn Saud, namely the Hijaz National Party (HNP), in addition to evaluating the development of the Hijaz liberation movement and the anti-Ibn Saud movement, namely the Ikhwan movement and the Hijaz Liberation Party (HNP). This study uses qualitative methods and library research by analyzing primary and secondary sources. Among the primary sources used are the Foreign Office (FO), Colonial Office (CO) and Political and Secret Department Record (IOR/L/PS) had obtained from The National Archives and the British Library, London. The results of the study found that the emergence of the anti-Ibn Saud movement in the Hijaz appeared after the conquest of the Hijaz by Ibn Saud who sought to dominate the Hijaz through a political and administrative approach. There were three movements that opposed Ibn Saud at that time, namely the Hijaz National Party, the Ikhwan movement and the Hijaz Liberation Party. Nevertheless, the struggle of all these movements eventually failed and was successfully removed by Ibn Saud starting with the banning of the HNP in 1926, followed by the decline of the Brotherhood movement in the early 1930s. The establishment of the state of Saudi Arabia in 1932 succeeded in challenging the HLP struggle leading to the banning of the movement in 1936.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本文讨论了20世纪20年代至30年代汉志解放运动和反伊本·沙特运动的发展。三次解放希贾兹和反伊本沙特运动的出现,证明了该运动的重大意义和反伊本沙特的意义。因此,本文的重点是考察汉志解放运动和反伊本沙特运动,即汉志民族党(HNP)的早期发展,以及评估汉志解放运动和反伊本沙特运动,即伊赫万运动和汉志解放党(HNP)的发展。本研究采用定性方法和图书馆研究,分析一手资料和第二手资料。所使用的主要资料来源包括外交部(FO)、殖民地办公室(CO)和政治和秘密部门记录(IOR/L/PS),这些资料都是从伦敦国家档案馆和大英图书馆获得的。研究结果发现,反伊本沙特运动在希贾兹地区的出现是在伊本沙特征服希贾兹地区之后,他试图通过政治和行政手段统治希贾兹地区。当时有三个反对伊本·沙特的运动,即汉志民族党、伊赫万运动和汉志解放党。然而,所有这些运动的斗争最终都失败了,并被伊本·沙特成功地从1926年禁止海地警察开始,随后是20世纪30年代初兄弟会运动的衰落。1932年沙特阿拉伯王国的建立成功地挑战了HLP的斗争,导致该运动于1936年被禁止。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
66.70%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ottoman Civilization and Its Impact in Contemporary Malaysia: An Evaluation Goverment Control of Islamic Ideology Movement: A Case of Indonesia Peninggalan Kesultanan Singgora sebagai Warisan Ketamadunan Melayu-Islam di Songkhla, Thailand Selatan The Impact of Television Drama in Understanding History Adab Guru dan Murid dalam Pendidikan Menurut Perspektif Syeikh Muḥammad Khaṭīb Langgien: Analisis terhadap Kitab Dawā’ al-Qulūb min al-‘Uyūb
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1