Examining the utility of the Stages of Change model for working with offenders with learning disabilities

H. Panting, C. Swift, Wendy Goodman, C. Davis
{"title":"Examining the utility of the Stages of Change model for working with offenders with learning disabilities","authors":"H. Panting, C. Swift, Wendy Goodman, C. Davis","doi":"10.1108/JIDOB-02-2018-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to investigate whether the Stages of Change (SOC) model can be applied to working with offenders with learning disabilities (LD), and furthermore, to determine if it might be efficacious for this approach to be incorporated into a wider service model for this population.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper reports on the results of a consultation to a specialist forensic LD service in the South West of England. A two-pronged approach was taken to consult to the service in relation to the research questions. First, a comprehensive literature review was undertaken, and second, other forensic LD teams and experts in the field were consulted.\n\n\nFindings\nThere is a dearth of research that has examined the application of the SOC model to working with offenders with LD, and as such, firm conclusions cannot be drawn as to its efficacy in this population. The evidence base for the SOC model in itself is lacking, and has been widely critiqued. However, there are currently no other evidence-based models for understanding motivation to change in offenders with LD.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThere is a clear clinical need for more robust theory and research around motivation to change, which can then be applied to clinical work with offenders with LD.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThere has been a historical narrative in offender rehabilitation that “nothing works” (Burrowes and Needs, 2009). As such, it is more important than ever for the evidence base to enhance the understanding of motivation to change in offending populations.\n","PeriodicalId":43468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/JIDOB-02-2018-0003","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JIDOB-02-2018-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether the Stages of Change (SOC) model can be applied to working with offenders with learning disabilities (LD), and furthermore, to determine if it might be efficacious for this approach to be incorporated into a wider service model for this population. Design/methodology/approach This paper reports on the results of a consultation to a specialist forensic LD service in the South West of England. A two-pronged approach was taken to consult to the service in relation to the research questions. First, a comprehensive literature review was undertaken, and second, other forensic LD teams and experts in the field were consulted. Findings There is a dearth of research that has examined the application of the SOC model to working with offenders with LD, and as such, firm conclusions cannot be drawn as to its efficacy in this population. The evidence base for the SOC model in itself is lacking, and has been widely critiqued. However, there are currently no other evidence-based models for understanding motivation to change in offenders with LD. Research limitations/implications There is a clear clinical need for more robust theory and research around motivation to change, which can then be applied to clinical work with offenders with LD. Originality/value There has been a historical narrative in offender rehabilitation that “nothing works” (Burrowes and Needs, 2009). As such, it is more important than ever for the evidence base to enhance the understanding of motivation to change in offending populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究变革阶段模型在处理有学习障碍的罪犯方面的效用
目的本文的目的是研究改变阶段(SOC)模型是否可以应用于学习障碍罪犯(LD)的工作,并进一步确定将这种方法纳入更广泛的服务模型中是否有效。设计/方法/方法本文报告了对英格兰西南部一家专业法医LD服务机构的咨询结果。采取了双管齐下的方法,就研究问题向服务部门咨询。首先,进行了全面的文献综述,其次,咨询了该领域的其他法医LD团队和专家。发现缺乏研究来检验SOC模型在处理LD罪犯方面的应用,因此,无法对其在该人群中的疗效得出确切的结论。SOC模型本身缺乏证据基础,受到了广泛的批评。然而,目前还没有其他基于证据的模型来理解LD罪犯的改变动机。研究局限性/含义临床上显然需要围绕改变动机进行更有力的理论和研究,然后可以应用于LD罪犯的临床工作。独创性/价值在罪犯康复中有一种历史叙事,即“什么都不起作用”(Burrowes and Needs,2009)。因此,证据基础比以往任何时候都更重要的是,要增强对犯罪人群改变动机的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Trauma and adversity in forensic patients with an intellectual disability: a review of risk assessment reports What is important in forensic psychiatric evaluation in people with Down syndrome? A sample from Türkiye Demographic, forensic and service involvement characteristics related to adults referred to a community-based learning disability forensic team pre- and post-COVID-19 The relationship between institutional climate and constructive deviance A feasibility study to identify the presence of autism specific risk factors in secure services using an autism specific framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1