Productivity, feed quality and bioenergetic estimation of cultivation of the sainfoin varieties and promising lines

S. Ignatiev, А. А. Regidin, G. Metlina, N. Kravchenko, K. Goryunov
{"title":"Productivity, feed quality and bioenergetic estimation of cultivation of the sainfoin varieties and promising lines","authors":"S. Ignatiev, А. А. Regidin, G. Metlina, N. Kravchenko, K. Goryunov","doi":"10.31367/2079-8725-2022-83-6-11-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current paper has presented the estimation results of productivity, feed quality and bioenergetic efficiency of cultivation of the sainfoin varieties and promising lines. The study was carried out at the FSBSI «ARC «Donskoy» in 2019–2022. The objects of the study were 5 sainfoin varieties included in the State List and approved for use in different regions of Russia, one variety, which is currently on the State Variety Testing, and three promising lines. The standard variety was ‘Zernogradsky 2’. For 4 years the sainfoin varieties, included in the List, exceeded the standard variety on 8.3–17.4 % of green mass yield, on 5.4–10.8 % of dry matter, on 6.8–13.9 % of seeds. The variety ‘Atamansky 20’ and promising lines exceeded the standard on 17.8–23.4 %, 23.0–29.7 % and 16.7–31.0 %, respec tively. The sainfoin varieties and lines significantly exceeded the standard variety in their nutritional value. These indicators were the highest in the line ‘Sin 3/2004’ and amounted to 5.610 thousand/ha f.u., 1.59 t/ha of crude and 990 kg/ha of digestible protein. The varieties ‘Atamansky’, ‘Veles’, ‘Sudar’ and ‘Shuravi’ accumulated energy on 8.5–16.5 % more than the standard variety with green mass productivity, net energy income exceeded that of the standard variety on 9.1–17.7 %. The promising lines produced on 21.2–23.6 % more energy with vegetative mass harvesting than the standard variety. The coefficients of energy efficiency of the varieties and promising lines were 3.4–3.6. With seed yields, sainfoin varieties and promising lines accumulated energy on 6.5–31.1 % more than the standard variety. At the same time, net energy income was higher on 16.3–83.5 %, and the CEE was 1.7–2.2.","PeriodicalId":33209,"journal":{"name":"Zernovoe khoziaistvo Rossii","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zernovoe khoziaistvo Rossii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2022-83-6-11-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current paper has presented the estimation results of productivity, feed quality and bioenergetic efficiency of cultivation of the sainfoin varieties and promising lines. The study was carried out at the FSBSI «ARC «Donskoy» in 2019–2022. The objects of the study were 5 sainfoin varieties included in the State List and approved for use in different regions of Russia, one variety, which is currently on the State Variety Testing, and three promising lines. The standard variety was ‘Zernogradsky 2’. For 4 years the sainfoin varieties, included in the List, exceeded the standard variety on 8.3–17.4 % of green mass yield, on 5.4–10.8 % of dry matter, on 6.8–13.9 % of seeds. The variety ‘Atamansky 20’ and promising lines exceeded the standard on 17.8–23.4 %, 23.0–29.7 % and 16.7–31.0 %, respec tively. The sainfoin varieties and lines significantly exceeded the standard variety in their nutritional value. These indicators were the highest in the line ‘Sin 3/2004’ and amounted to 5.610 thousand/ha f.u., 1.59 t/ha of crude and 990 kg/ha of digestible protein. The varieties ‘Atamansky’, ‘Veles’, ‘Sudar’ and ‘Shuravi’ accumulated energy on 8.5–16.5 % more than the standard variety with green mass productivity, net energy income exceeded that of the standard variety on 9.1–17.7 %. The promising lines produced on 21.2–23.6 % more energy with vegetative mass harvesting than the standard variety. The coefficients of energy efficiency of the varieties and promising lines were 3.4–3.6. With seed yields, sainfoin varieties and promising lines accumulated energy on 6.5–31.1 % more than the standard variety. At the same time, net energy income was higher on 16.3–83.5 %, and the CEE was 1.7–2.2.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
红豆草品种和优良品系的生产力、饲料品质和生物能量估算
本文介绍了红豆品种和前景株系的产量、饲料品质和生物能源效率的评价结果。该研究于2019-2022年在“顿斯科伊ARC”FSBSI进行。研究对象为5个已列入国家名录并在俄罗斯不同地区批准使用的红豆素品种,1个目前正在进行国家品种试验的品种,以及3个有发展前景的品系。标准品种是“Zernogradsky 2”。4年来,列入名录的红豆品种绿色质量产量8.3 - 17.4%、干物质5.4 - 10.8%、种子6.8 - 13.9%均超过标准品种。品种“阿塔曼斯基20号”和有希望品系的超标率分别为17.8% ~ 23.4%、23.0% ~ 29.7%和16.7% ~ 31.0%。红豆品种和品系的营养价值明显超过标准品种。这些指标在“sin3 /2004”线上最高,分别为561万/公顷英尺,1.59吨/公顷原油和990公斤/公顷可消化蛋白质。‘Atamansky’、‘Veles’、‘Sudar’和‘Shuravi’的绿色质量生产力累计能量比标准品种高出8.5 ~ 16.5%,净能量收入比标准品种高出9.1 ~ 17.7%。有希望的品系在无性大量收获的情况下比标准品系多产生21.2 ~ 23.6%的能量。品种和候选品系的能量利用系数在3.4 ~ 3.6之间。在种子产量方面,红豆品种和有希望品系的能量积累比标准品种多6.5 ~ 31.1%。同时,净能源收益较高,为16.3 ~ 83.5%,CEE为1.7 ~ 2.2%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The effect of weather and landscape conditions on productivity of the spring wheat variety ‘Zlata’ Productivity and grain quality of winter wheat varieties depending on the fractional nitrogen top dressings and seeding rates Features of development and harmfulness of the berry bug in grain crops in the north-west of Russia Study of the initial material and its use in winter durum wheat breeding for resistance to the Rostov population of the smut pathogen Productivity and grain quality of winter bread wheat varieties in the irrigated zone of the Republic of Dagestan when using biological products
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1