Cognitive Effort in Text Processing and Reading Comprehension in Print and on Tablet: An Eye-Tracking Study

IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Discourse Processes Pub Date : 2022-02-03 DOI:10.1080/0163853X.2022.2030157
P. Delgado, L. Salmerón
{"title":"Cognitive Effort in Text Processing and Reading Comprehension in Print and on Tablet: An Eye-Tracking Study","authors":"P. Delgado, L. Salmerón","doi":"10.1080/0163853X.2022.2030157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the present article, we examined the effect of the reading medium and the reading time-frame on text processing, metacognitive monitoring of comprehension, and comprehension outcomes. The eye movements of 116 undergraduates were recorded while they read three texts in print and three texts on a tablet under self-paced reading time or under time pressure. After each text, participants predicted their performance on a subsequent text comprehension test (i.e., an indicator of metacognitive monitoring). Overall, the results showed that participant performed similarly across media in all the reading processes evaluated, regardless of the reading time-frame. The only significant difference indicated that participants fixated more on text titles when reading in print than on the tablet. Although comprehension scores were slightly higher when reading in print, the difference only approached significance. The findings adhere to recent evidence suggesting that the in-print reading superiority is negligible when reading on tablets, as compared to reading on computers.","PeriodicalId":11316,"journal":{"name":"Discourse Processes","volume":"59 1","pages":"237 - 274"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse Processes","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2022.2030157","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the present article, we examined the effect of the reading medium and the reading time-frame on text processing, metacognitive monitoring of comprehension, and comprehension outcomes. The eye movements of 116 undergraduates were recorded while they read three texts in print and three texts on a tablet under self-paced reading time or under time pressure. After each text, participants predicted their performance on a subsequent text comprehension test (i.e., an indicator of metacognitive monitoring). Overall, the results showed that participant performed similarly across media in all the reading processes evaluated, regardless of the reading time-frame. The only significant difference indicated that participants fixated more on text titles when reading in print than on the tablet. Although comprehension scores were slightly higher when reading in print, the difference only approached significance. The findings adhere to recent evidence suggesting that the in-print reading superiority is negligible when reading on tablets, as compared to reading on computers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印刷品和平板电脑上文本处理和阅读理解的认知努力:一项眼动追踪研究
摘要在本文中,我们考察了阅读媒介和阅读时间框架对文本处理、理解的元认知监控和理解结果的影响。记录了116名本科生在自主阅读时间或时间压力下阅读三篇印刷文本和三篇平板文本时的眼动。在每一篇课文之后,参与者预测他们在随后的课文理解测试中的表现(即元认知监控指标)。总的来说,研究结果表明,无论阅读时间框架如何,参与者在所有评估的阅读过程中都表现相似。唯一的显著差异表明,参与者在阅读印刷品时比在平板电脑上更关注文本标题。尽管阅读印刷品时理解力得分略高,但差异仅接近显著性。这一发现与最近的证据相一致,表明与在电脑上阅读相比,在平板电脑上阅读的印刷品阅读优势可以忽略不计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Discourse Processes is a multidisciplinary journal providing a forum for cross-fertilization of ideas from diverse disciplines sharing a common interest in discourse--prose comprehension and recall, dialogue analysis, text grammar construction, computer simulation of natural language, cross-cultural comparisons of communicative competence, or related topics. The problems posed by multisentence contexts and the methods required to investigate them, although not always unique to discourse, are sufficiently distinct so as to require an organized mode of scientific interaction made possible through the journal.
期刊最新文献
Children’s understanding of referential nominal metaphors: a path to the heart of text comprehension An interactional practice of registering expectation discrepancy: the use of the turn-initial token are in Japanese Does the gender asterisk (“Gendersternchen”) as a special form of gender-fair language impair comprehensibility? Russ Tomlin, attention, working memory, reference, and referential choice Introduction: special issue in honor of Walter Kintsch
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1