Hazard at weather scale for extreme rainfall forecast reduces uncertainty

Q1 Earth and Planetary Sciences Water Security Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.wasec.2021.100106
Shrabani S. Tripathy , Subhankar Karmakar , Subimal Ghosh
{"title":"Hazard at weather scale for extreme rainfall forecast reduces uncertainty","authors":"Shrabani S. Tripathy ,&nbsp;Subhankar Karmakar ,&nbsp;Subimal Ghosh","doi":"10.1016/j.wasec.2021.100106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Globally increasing intensity and frequency of extreme rainfall events demand reliable early warning systems. Despite significant improvements in the skills of weather models, the state-of-art extreme rainfall forecasts, at a sufficient lead time, still suffer from high biases, high uncertainties, low hit rates, and high false alarms. Bias correction methods often improve the performances of the models, but still, the skills remain moderate. Here, we propose a new methodology to forecast extreme rainfall events, in terms of hazard, instead of rainfall amount. At a weather scale, we define ‘hazard’ as the probability of occurrence of an extreme rainfall event, given a forecasted rainfall for a day with sufficient lead time. The conditional probability is obtained from the past observed data and the hindcast. The method is applied to India with observations from the India Meteorological Department (IMD) and hindcasts from the Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFS) Reforecast Version 2 for 1985–2015. Extreme days at a grid level are defined as the days with observed rainfall exceeding the 95th percentile. Accordingly, we calculate the hazard for all the lead days till 15 days. For most of the extremes in each grid, the model can predict an extreme showing a high hazard value greater than 0.6 from lead day 7. This high hit rate may give the stakeholders adequate time to plan mitigation strategies. Comparing the proposed method with traditional methods, we find a significant improvement in terms of hit rate and the uncertainty across the ensembles.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37308,"journal":{"name":"Water Security","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468312421000237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Globally increasing intensity and frequency of extreme rainfall events demand reliable early warning systems. Despite significant improvements in the skills of weather models, the state-of-art extreme rainfall forecasts, at a sufficient lead time, still suffer from high biases, high uncertainties, low hit rates, and high false alarms. Bias correction methods often improve the performances of the models, but still, the skills remain moderate. Here, we propose a new methodology to forecast extreme rainfall events, in terms of hazard, instead of rainfall amount. At a weather scale, we define ‘hazard’ as the probability of occurrence of an extreme rainfall event, given a forecasted rainfall for a day with sufficient lead time. The conditional probability is obtained from the past observed data and the hindcast. The method is applied to India with observations from the India Meteorological Department (IMD) and hindcasts from the Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFS) Reforecast Version 2 for 1985–2015. Extreme days at a grid level are defined as the days with observed rainfall exceeding the 95th percentile. Accordingly, we calculate the hazard for all the lead days till 15 days. For most of the extremes in each grid, the model can predict an extreme showing a high hazard value greater than 0.6 from lead day 7. This high hit rate may give the stakeholders adequate time to plan mitigation strategies. Comparing the proposed method with traditional methods, we find a significant improvement in terms of hit rate and the uncertainty across the ensembles.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
极端降雨预报的天气尺度危害减少了不确定性
全球极端降雨事件的强度和频率不断增加,需要可靠的预警系统。尽管天气模型的技能有了显著的提高,但最先进的极端降雨预报,在足够的提前时间内,仍然存在高偏差、高不确定性、低命中率和高误报的问题。偏差校正方法通常可以提高模型的性能,但仍然是一般的技能。在这里,我们提出了一种新的方法来预测极端降雨事件,根据危害,而不是降雨量。在天气尺度上,我们将“危险”定义为极端降雨事件发生的概率,假设有足够的提前时间预测一天的降雨量。条件概率是由过去观测数据和后预测得到的。该方法应用于印度,使用了印度气象部门(IMD)的观测数据和全球综合预报系统(GEFS)重新预报版本2 1985-2015的预测数据。格网水平的极端日数是指观测到的降雨量超过第95个百分位数的日数。据此,我们计算了15天前所有前置日的危险度。对于每个网格中的大多数极端情况,该模型可以预测从第7天开始显示高危害值大于0.6的极端情况。这种高命中率可能使利益相关者有足够的时间来规划缓解战略。与传统方法相比,我们发现该方法在命中率和不确定性方面有显著提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Water Security
Water Security Earth and Planetary Sciences-Oceanography
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Water Security aims to publish papers that contribute to a better understanding of the economic, social, biophysical, technological, and institutional influencers of current and future global water security. At the same time the journal intends to stimulate debate, backed by science, with strong interdisciplinary connections. The goal is to publish concise and timely reviews and synthesis articles about research covering the following elements of water security: -Shortage- Flooding- Governance- Health and Sanitation
期刊最新文献
Gender dimensions of water vending in LMICs: A scoping review The past, present, and future of Ghana’s WASH sector. An explorative analysis Using managed aquifer recharge to address land subsidence: Insights from a global literature review The syndemics of food and water insecurities on emotional distress and overall wellbeing in Ghana: Findings from a cross-sectional study More than Magnitude: Towards a multidimensional understanding of unprecedented weather to better support disaster management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1