Arguing through best practice: The role of argumentation from example in activists’ social media posts on sustainable fashion

IF 1.4 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Discourse Studies Pub Date : 2023-03-30 DOI:10.1177/14614456231163422
S. Greco, Chiara Mercuri, Barbara de Cock, Rebecca G. Schär
{"title":"Arguing through best practice: The role of argumentation from example in activists’ social media posts on sustainable fashion","authors":"S. Greco, Chiara Mercuri, Barbara de Cock, Rebecca G. Schär","doi":"10.1177/14614456231163422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Examining a multilingual dataset of Twitter and Instagram messages posted by a variety of actors (NGOs and individual activists, small brands, and others) during the 2020 and 2021 Fashion Revolution Week campaigns for a more sustainable fashion system, we analyze frequently occurring discursive representations and self-representations that include individual mentions of persons or small brands. We show that individual mentions are mostly proposed in the tweets and Instagram messages posted by small brands and that they count as argumentation from example. Arguments based on a locus from example are part of two simultaneous argumentative patterns, responding to different issues and using two different maxims, respectively based on induction and from a principle ‘from truth to possibility’; in the latter case, brands represent themselves as best practice cases, showing that a more sustainable fashion system is possible because it is already happening. Our findings contribute to explaining how the activity type of digital activism successfully integrates multiple goals of different actors (citizens, NGOs, brands) in the campaigning by offering the possibility of simultaneous argumentation.","PeriodicalId":47598,"journal":{"name":"Discourse Studies","volume":"25 1","pages":"530 - 548"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456231163422","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Examining a multilingual dataset of Twitter and Instagram messages posted by a variety of actors (NGOs and individual activists, small brands, and others) during the 2020 and 2021 Fashion Revolution Week campaigns for a more sustainable fashion system, we analyze frequently occurring discursive representations and self-representations that include individual mentions of persons or small brands. We show that individual mentions are mostly proposed in the tweets and Instagram messages posted by small brands and that they count as argumentation from example. Arguments based on a locus from example are part of two simultaneous argumentative patterns, responding to different issues and using two different maxims, respectively based on induction and from a principle ‘from truth to possibility’; in the latter case, brands represent themselves as best practice cases, showing that a more sustainable fashion system is possible because it is already happening. Our findings contribute to explaining how the activity type of digital activism successfully integrates multiple goals of different actors (citizens, NGOs, brands) in the campaigning by offering the possibility of simultaneous argumentation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过最佳实践进行论证:榜样论证在活动家社交媒体上发布的可持续时尚帖子中的作用
研究了2020年和2021年时尚革命周期间各种参与者(非政府组织和个人活动家、小品牌等)发布的Twitter和Instagram消息的多语言数据集,以建立一个更可持续的时尚系统,我们分析了频繁出现的话语表征和自我表征,包括个人提及的人物或小品牌。我们发现,小品牌在推特和Instagram上发布的消息中大多提出了个人提及,并且它们可以算作实例论证。基于实例轨迹的论证是两种同时进行的论证模式的一部分,它们回应不同的问题,使用两种不同的格言,分别基于归纳法和“从真理到可能性”原则;在后一种情况下,品牌将自己作为最佳实践案例,表明一个更可持续的时尚体系是可能的,因为它已经发生了。我们的研究结果有助于解释数字行动主义的活动类型如何通过提供同时辩论的可能性,成功地将不同参与者(公民、非政府组织、品牌)的多个目标整合到竞选活动中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Discourse Studies
Discourse Studies COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Discourse Studies is a multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal for the study of text and talk. Publishing outstanding work on the structures and strategies of written and spoken discourse, special attention is given to cross-disciplinary studies of text and talk in linguistics, anthropology, ethnomethodology, cognitive and social psychology, communication studies and law.
期刊最新文献
Scaling the value of multilingualism: ‘Common-sense’ narratives of growth and inequality in an expert report to the U.S. Congress Prospective expertise: The use of ‘listen’ in the discourse of television sports pundits Introduction to “scaling stories: Narratives and the dialogic regimentation of scales” Constructing cancel culture: Strategic scaling in stories of “cancellation” Bonding with followers: Chronotopes and scales in political communication on Instagram
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1