Optimising Well-Being and Learning Through Participatory Processes and Practices: an International Comparative Analysis of Ten Groundwork Case-Studies in Schools

Alison Taysum, K. Arar, P. Chopra, H. Imam, Kathy Harrison, G. McNamara, J. O’Hara, V. Pogosian, A. Mynbayeva, Z. Yelbayeva, Samuel J. McGuinness
{"title":"Optimising Well-Being and Learning Through Participatory Processes and Practices: an International Comparative Analysis of Ten Groundwork Case-Studies in Schools","authors":"Alison Taysum, K. Arar, P. Chopra, H. Imam, Kathy Harrison, G. McNamara, J. O’Hara, V. Pogosian, A. Mynbayeva, Z. Yelbayeva, Samuel J. McGuinness","doi":"10.14658/PUPJ-IJSE-2020-1-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents a theory of participation in systems of learning that emerges from our evidence gathered through partnerships between schools and the academy. The theory identifies young people need to endorse common principles of participation to include and respect all. Educational leaders’ evidence informed intervention strategies can positively impact young people’s inclusive and respectful participation in the action-research. The theory of participation conceptualises young people’s need for opportunities to pursue their ambitions and interests. Leaders’ intervention strategies may develop young people’s participation in attaining target examination outcomes to achieve their ambitions. We then develop the theory of participation regarding young people pursuing independent interests and ambitions in association with the other, to enable them to be drivers of social change. To do this they need to understand their future identity as potential consumers, employees, employers, and entrepreneurs with Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) that challenge public corporations in a variety of ways. We theorise how young people are well situated to build capacity in Europe and globally using the social media networks they have already developed. Our evidence identified five participation principals of inclusion, respect, trust in the search for truth, constructive cross-cultural critique of alternative world views to arrive at a shared multicultural world view, and the generation of new knowledge to enable the re-imagining of new futures where young people are drivers of social change. From these principals we developed a theory of practice and four global standards as guidelines. First, a commitment to inclusionary partnerships and communities of practice. Second, distributed autonomy across stakeholders in the institution characterized by respect for individuals’ associated rights and responsibilities. Third, constructive cross-cultural criticism underpinned by trust in a search for truth, using different group’s constructed identity schema’s to develop a shared multicultural world view. Fourth, the generation of new knowledge through structures and mechanisms to optimize participation.","PeriodicalId":37576,"journal":{"name":"Italian Journal of Sociology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Journal of Sociology of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14658/PUPJ-IJSE-2020-1-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The paper presents a theory of participation in systems of learning that emerges from our evidence gathered through partnerships between schools and the academy. The theory identifies young people need to endorse common principles of participation to include and respect all. Educational leaders’ evidence informed intervention strategies can positively impact young people’s inclusive and respectful participation in the action-research. The theory of participation conceptualises young people’s need for opportunities to pursue their ambitions and interests. Leaders’ intervention strategies may develop young people’s participation in attaining target examination outcomes to achieve their ambitions. We then develop the theory of participation regarding young people pursuing independent interests and ambitions in association with the other, to enable them to be drivers of social change. To do this they need to understand their future identity as potential consumers, employees, employers, and entrepreneurs with Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) that challenge public corporations in a variety of ways. We theorise how young people are well situated to build capacity in Europe and globally using the social media networks they have already developed. Our evidence identified five participation principals of inclusion, respect, trust in the search for truth, constructive cross-cultural critique of alternative world views to arrive at a shared multicultural world view, and the generation of new knowledge to enable the re-imagining of new futures where young people are drivers of social change. From these principals we developed a theory of practice and four global standards as guidelines. First, a commitment to inclusionary partnerships and communities of practice. Second, distributed autonomy across stakeholders in the institution characterized by respect for individuals’ associated rights and responsibilities. Third, constructive cross-cultural criticism underpinned by trust in a search for truth, using different group’s constructed identity schema’s to develop a shared multicultural world view. Fourth, the generation of new knowledge through structures and mechanisms to optimize participation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过参与过程和实践优化幸福和学习——十个学校基础工作案例的国际比较分析
本文提出了一个参与学习系统的理论,该理论来自我们通过学校和学院之间的合作伙伴关系收集的证据。该理论认为,年轻人需要赞同参与的共同原则,以包容和尊重所有人。教育领导者的循证干预策略可以对青少年包容和尊重地参与行动研究产生积极影响。参与理论将年轻人对机会的需求概念化,以追求他们的抱负和兴趣。领导者的干预策略可以培养青少年参与达到目标考试成绩,以实现他们的抱负。然后,我们发展了参与理论,即年轻人与他人一起追求独立的兴趣和抱负,使他们成为社会变革的推动者。要做到这一点,他们需要了解自己作为潜在消费者、雇员、雇主和中小企业(SME)的企业家的未来身份,这些企业以各种方式挑战公共公司。我们对年轻人如何利用他们已经发展起来的社交媒体网络在欧洲和全球建立能力进行了理论分析。我们的证据确定了五个参与原则:包容、尊重、在寻求真理的过程中信任、对另类世界观进行建设性的跨文化批评,以达成共同的多元文化世界观,以及产生新知识,以重新构想年轻人成为社会变革驱动力的新未来。根据这些原则,我们发展了一套实践理论和四项全球标准作为指导方针。第一,致力于建立包容性伙伴关系和实践社区。第二,机构中跨利益相关者的分布式自治,其特征是尊重个人相关的权利和责任。第三,以寻求真理的信任为基础的建设性跨文化批评,利用不同群体构建的身份图式来发展共同的多元文化世界观。第四,通过结构机制优化新知识的生成参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Italian Journal of Sociology of Education
Italian Journal of Sociology of Education Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Italian Journal of Sociology of Education is a peer-reviewed academic journal published three times a year (February, June, October) and sponsored by the Educational Section of the Italian Sociological Association (AIS-EDU).The journal aims at presenting up-to-date, state of the art theoretical and empirical studies concerning socialization, education, and educational institutions, enlarging and deepening the mutual knowledge and collaboration between Italian and foreign scholars within a broad global perspective. Main topics are the meanings of education; socialization and its institutional loci; school and the university; human and social capital; lifelong education; educational actors and policy; immigration and education.
期刊最新文献
Young people between uncertainty and agency. An analysis of the strategies of transition to adulthood in Italy Extending the Current Theorization on Cyberbullying: Importance of Including Socio-Psychological Perspectives Optimising Well-Being and Learning Through Participatory Processes and Practices: an International Comparative Analysis of Ten Groundwork Case-Studies in Schools Teachers’ Participation in School Decision-Making Processes and Practices: the Case of an Indian Government Secondary School Distributed Leadership to Enhance Participation in School Processes and Practices to Improve Learning: A Northern Irish Faith Secondary School Case-Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1