The False Promise of Progress: Human Rights and the Legitimation of Inequality

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF CHRISTIAN ETHICS Pub Date : 2022-02-04 DOI:10.5840/jsce202111950
Nellie Wamaitha
{"title":"The False Promise of Progress: Human Rights and the Legitimation of Inequality","authors":"Nellie Wamaitha","doi":"10.5840/jsce202111950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Modernity's social betterment programs such as human rights depend upon a narrative of progress. Progress sustains the ideology that the problems of the non-Western and non-white world are caused by a lagging behind in time that prevents the embrace of the norms that deliver social progress and not by unjust structures of global political and economic power. Progress frames the problem of inequality as cultural rather than political. This occlusion of power means that human rights do not attempt to address important power differences between the Global North and the Global South. Because human rights discourse is undergirded by progress, material human rights frames and institutions actually prevent radical change and reproduce imperial domination. Human rights, therefore, cannot deliver on their promise of equality. This promise must instead be entrusted to an eschatological hope that rejects progress and is disruptive of ongoing oppressive power arrangements.","PeriodicalId":43321,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF CHRISTIAN ETHICS","volume":"41 1","pages":"297 - 314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF CHRISTIAN ETHICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/jsce202111950","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:Modernity's social betterment programs such as human rights depend upon a narrative of progress. Progress sustains the ideology that the problems of the non-Western and non-white world are caused by a lagging behind in time that prevents the embrace of the norms that deliver social progress and not by unjust structures of global political and economic power. Progress frames the problem of inequality as cultural rather than political. This occlusion of power means that human rights do not attempt to address important power differences between the Global North and the Global South. Because human rights discourse is undergirded by progress, material human rights frames and institutions actually prevent radical change and reproduce imperial domination. Human rights, therefore, cannot deliver on their promise of equality. This promise must instead be entrusted to an eschatological hope that rejects progress and is disruptive of ongoing oppressive power arrangements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《进步的虚假承诺:人权与不平等的正当性
摘要:现代性的社会改善计划,如人权,取决于进步的叙事。进步支撑着一种意识形态,即非西方和非白人世界的问题是由时间滞后造成的,这种滞后阻碍了对实现社会进步的规范的接受,而不是由全球政治和经济力量的不公正结构造成的。进步将不平等问题界定为文化问题而非政治问题。这种权力闭塞意味着人权不试图解决全球北方和全球南方之间的重要权力差异。因为人权话语是以进步为基础的,物质人权框架和制度实际上阻止了激进的变革,并再现了帝国统治。因此,人权无法兑现其平等承诺。相反,这一承诺必须被赋予末世论的希望,这种希望拒绝进步,破坏正在进行的压迫性权力安排。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
The Business of War: Theological and Ethical Reflections on the Military-Industrial Complex ed. by James Mccarty, Matthew Tapie, and Justin Bronson Barringer (review) Longing for the Good Life: Virtue Ethics After Protestantism by Pieter Vos (review) Aquinas and the Market: Toward a Humane Economy by Mary L. Hirschfield (review) Navigating the Divide: Healing Practices and Collective Wellbeing in a Nairobi Clinic Liturgy, Virtue, and the Foundations of an Ecclesial Ethic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1