Dual-energy X-ray Performance Among Medicare Beneficiaries: 2005-2019

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Clinical Densitometry Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jocd.2023.101385
Tyler Prout MD (Primary Author) , Casey E. Pelzl MPH (Contributing Author) , Eric W. Christensen PhD (Contributing Author) , Neil Binkley MD (Contributing Author) , John Schousboe MD (Contributing Author) , Diane Krueger BS, CBDT (Contributing Author)
{"title":"Dual-energy X-ray Performance Among Medicare Beneficiaries: 2005-2019","authors":"Tyler Prout MD (Primary Author) ,&nbsp;Casey E. Pelzl MPH (Contributing Author) ,&nbsp;Eric W. Christensen PhD (Contributing Author) ,&nbsp;Neil Binkley MD (Contributing Author) ,&nbsp;John Schousboe MD (Contributing Author) ,&nbsp;Diane Krueger BS, CBDT (Contributing Author)","doi":"10.1016/j.jocd.2023.101385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose/Aims</h3><p>To provide updated trends in DXA number, utilization rates, place of service and interpreter specialty based on a Medicare population dataset.</p></div><div><h3>Rationale/Background</h3><p>DXA exam utilization rate, place of service and interpreters have changed since 2005.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Medicare Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary Limited Data Set between 2005-2019 was used. All claims with CPT DXA codes 76075, 76076, 77080, 77081 were retained. Annual counts of DXA scans and rates per 10,000 Medicare beneficiaries were calculated. Annual distributions (%) of DXA scans performed by place of service (Office, Outpatient hospital<span><span><span><span> [OH], Other), provider type (Radiologist, Non-Radiologist, Advanced Practice Practitioner [APP]), and interpreter specialty (Radiology, Primary Care, Ob/Gyn, </span>Rheumatology, </span>Endocrinology, Other) were described. </span>Linear regression was used to identify significant trends (significance assigned at p &lt; 0.05) of the mean annual share of DXA utilization by place of service, provider type, and specialty.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Annual DXA use/10,000 beneficiaries peaked in 2008 at 832, declined to 656 in 2015 and subsequently increased (p &lt; 0.001) by a mean of ∼38 to 807 in 2019 (Figure 1). In 2005, 70.7% of DXAs were performed in office settings with 28.6% acquired in OH. Since 2005, number of DXAs performed in OH increased 1.8%/yr, reaching 51.7% in 2019, and decreased (p &lt; 0.001) 1.8% at office sites. In 2005, 53.7% were interpreted by non-Radiologists and 43.5% by Radiologists. Across the study period the mean proportion interpreted by Radiologists increased (p-values for trend &lt; 0.001) in both office (0.3%/yr) and OH (2.0%/yr) settings, such that by 2019, Radiologists read 73.5% of DXA exams and non-Radiologists 22.8% (Figure 2). A decline in interpretation (p &lt; 0.001) was observed for Primary Care (mean 1.5%/yr), Rheumatology (mean 0.3%/yr) and Ob/Gyn (mean 0.2%/yr) with no significant change for Endocrinology. The share of DXA interpreted by APPs increased by a mean of 0.1%/yr (p &lt; 0.001) from 2005-2019.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>DXA number and utilization rate among Medicare beneficiaries has increased since 2015 and returned to 2005 levels. Office DXA rates have declined since 2005 with 51.7% of all scans now occurring in an outpatient hospital setting. DXA interpretation by Radiologists and APPs increased while most other specialties declined. Radiologist DXA interpretation has increased in both settings such that Radiology interpreted 73.5% of all DXAs submitted to Covered Medical Services for reimbursement in 2019.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094695023000355","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/Aims

To provide updated trends in DXA number, utilization rates, place of service and interpreter specialty based on a Medicare population dataset.

Rationale/Background

DXA exam utilization rate, place of service and interpreters have changed since 2005.

Methods

The Medicare Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary Limited Data Set between 2005-2019 was used. All claims with CPT DXA codes 76075, 76076, 77080, 77081 were retained. Annual counts of DXA scans and rates per 10,000 Medicare beneficiaries were calculated. Annual distributions (%) of DXA scans performed by place of service (Office, Outpatient hospital [OH], Other), provider type (Radiologist, Non-Radiologist, Advanced Practice Practitioner [APP]), and interpreter specialty (Radiology, Primary Care, Ob/Gyn, Rheumatology, Endocrinology, Other) were described. Linear regression was used to identify significant trends (significance assigned at p < 0.05) of the mean annual share of DXA utilization by place of service, provider type, and specialty.

Results

Annual DXA use/10,000 beneficiaries peaked in 2008 at 832, declined to 656 in 2015 and subsequently increased (p < 0.001) by a mean of ∼38 to 807 in 2019 (Figure 1). In 2005, 70.7% of DXAs were performed in office settings with 28.6% acquired in OH. Since 2005, number of DXAs performed in OH increased 1.8%/yr, reaching 51.7% in 2019, and decreased (p < 0.001) 1.8% at office sites. In 2005, 53.7% were interpreted by non-Radiologists and 43.5% by Radiologists. Across the study period the mean proportion interpreted by Radiologists increased (p-values for trend < 0.001) in both office (0.3%/yr) and OH (2.0%/yr) settings, such that by 2019, Radiologists read 73.5% of DXA exams and non-Radiologists 22.8% (Figure 2). A decline in interpretation (p < 0.001) was observed for Primary Care (mean 1.5%/yr), Rheumatology (mean 0.3%/yr) and Ob/Gyn (mean 0.2%/yr) with no significant change for Endocrinology. The share of DXA interpreted by APPs increased by a mean of 0.1%/yr (p < 0.001) from 2005-2019.

Implications

DXA number and utilization rate among Medicare beneficiaries has increased since 2015 and returned to 2005 levels. Office DXA rates have declined since 2005 with 51.7% of all scans now occurring in an outpatient hospital setting. DXA interpretation by Radiologists and APPs increased while most other specialties declined. Radiologist DXA interpretation has increased in both settings such that Radiology interpreted 73.5% of all DXAs submitted to Covered Medical Services for reimbursement in 2019.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2005-2019年医疗保险受益人的双能x射线表现
目的/目的提供基于Medicare人口数据集的DXA数量、使用率、服务地点和口译专业的最新趋势。自2005年以来,ddxa考试的使用率、服务地点和口译员发生了变化。方法使用2005-2019年医疗保险医师/供应商程序摘要有限数据集。所有CPT DXA代码为76075、76076、77080、77081的索赔被保留。计算了每10,000名医疗保险受益人的DXA扫描和比率的年度计数。描述了按服务地点(办公室、门诊医院[OH]、其他)、提供者类型(放射科医生、非放射科医生、高级执业医师[APP])和翻译专业(放射科、初级保健、妇产科、风湿病学、内分泌学、其他)进行的DXA扫描的年度分布(%)。线性回归用于识别显著趋势(显著性在p <按服务地点、提供者类型和专业,DXA使用率的年平均份额为0.05)。结果年度DXA使用/万名受益人在2008年达到832人的峰值,2015年下降到656人,随后增加(p <0.001), 2019年的平均值为~ 38至807(图1)。2005年,70.7%的DXAs是在办公室环境中进行的,28.6%是在OH中进行的。自2005年以来,在OH中进行的DXAs数量每年增长1.8%,2019年达到51.7%,并有所下降(p <0.001)办公场所为1.8%。2005年,53.7%由非放射科医生接诊,43.5%由放射科医生接诊。在整个研究期间,放射科医生解释的平均比例增加了(趋势p值<0.001),在办公室(0.3%/年)和OH(2.0%/年)设置中,这样到2019年,放射科医生阅读了73.5%的DXA检查,非放射科医生阅读了22.8%(图2)。0.001),初级保健(平均1.5%/年),风湿病(平均0.3%/年)和妇产科(平均0.2%/年),内分泌学无显著变化。应用程序解释的DXA的份额平均增加0.1%/年(p <0.001)。自2015年以来,医疗保险受益人的sdxa数量和使用率有所增加,并恢复到2005年的水平。自2005年以来,办公室DXA率有所下降,目前51.7%的扫描发生在门诊医院。放射科医生和应用程序的DXA解释增加,而大多数其他专业则下降。放射科医生的DXA解释在这两种情况下都有所增加,因此,2019年向承保医疗服务部门提交的所有DXA解释中,放射科解释了73.5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Journal of Clinical Densitometry 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal is committed to serving ISCD''s mission - the education of heterogenous physician specialties and technologists who are involved in the clinical assessment of skeletal health. The focus of JCD is bone mass measurement, including epidemiology of bone mass, how drugs and diseases alter bone mass, new techniques and quality assurance in bone mass imaging technologies, and bone mass health/economics. Combining high quality research and review articles with sound, practice-oriented advice, JCD meets the diverse diagnostic and management needs of radiologists, endocrinologists, nephrologists, rheumatologists, gynecologists, family physicians, internists, and technologists whose patients require diagnostic clinical densitometry for therapeutic management.
期刊最新文献
Technical and biological reliability of pQCT measured bone and muscle tissue quality across the age-span Correlation between body composition and bone mineral density differs by sex and skeletal site in overweight and obese Chinese subjects Lumbar spine densitometry in people with spinal cord injury: Investigation of potential sources of errors Comparison of Mineral Density of Dental Structures of Ancient Human Skeletons from the Roman Period with Modern-Day Human Dental Structures Lumbar Osteoarthritis in Patients with Osteoporosis Evaluated with the Lane and Wilke Scale and its Effect on Dexa Scores
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1