A Short History of K-12 Public School Spending in British Columbia, 1970-2020

IF 0.4 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Pub Date : 2021-05-31 DOI:10.7202/1078520ar
Jas Ellis
{"title":"A Short History of K-12 Public School Spending in British Columbia, 1970-2020","authors":"Jas Ellis","doi":"10.7202/1078520ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article looks at fifty years’ worth (1970-2020) of public K-12 education expenditure data from the Canadian province of British Columbia. It asks if spending has increased or decreased in this period and examines the causes and correlates of spending changes. Previous research has tended to assume that spending has decreased during this “neoliberal” period. However, historical and empirical research in this article gives a much different picture. K-12 public education spending in British Columbia – adjusted for inflation – is 250 percent higher in 2020 than it was in 1970. Meanwhile, enrolment in 2020 is only 110 percent of 1970 enrolment. The main cause of spending growth is increase in the number of teachers the system employs, which depended in no small part on the British Columbia Teachers’ Federation (BCTF)’s successful attempts to negotiate class size and composition rules. Other causes of spending growth are provincial and district spending priorities. Successive provincial governments have tried to rein in education spending by legislating cost controls on district spending and teacher contracts but have seldom achieved reductions for long. Spending increases and attempts at cost control are at best only linked partially to governing party ideology, with right-wing and left-wing provincial governments both initiating years of increases and cutbacks. More empirical research is needed, especially into spending’s effects on educational equity and quality, to complete the picture of education finance in British Columbia.","PeriodicalId":43834,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1078520ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article looks at fifty years’ worth (1970-2020) of public K-12 education expenditure data from the Canadian province of British Columbia. It asks if spending has increased or decreased in this period and examines the causes and correlates of spending changes. Previous research has tended to assume that spending has decreased during this “neoliberal” period. However, historical and empirical research in this article gives a much different picture. K-12 public education spending in British Columbia – adjusted for inflation – is 250 percent higher in 2020 than it was in 1970. Meanwhile, enrolment in 2020 is only 110 percent of 1970 enrolment. The main cause of spending growth is increase in the number of teachers the system employs, which depended in no small part on the British Columbia Teachers’ Federation (BCTF)’s successful attempts to negotiate class size and composition rules. Other causes of spending growth are provincial and district spending priorities. Successive provincial governments have tried to rein in education spending by legislating cost controls on district spending and teacher contracts but have seldom achieved reductions for long. Spending increases and attempts at cost control are at best only linked partially to governing party ideology, with right-wing and left-wing provincial governments both initiating years of increases and cutbacks. More empirical research is needed, especially into spending’s effects on educational equity and quality, to complete the picture of education finance in British Columbia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1970-2020年不列颠哥伦比亚省K-12公立学校支出简史
本文研究了加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省50年(1970-2020年)的公立K-12教育支出数据。它询问这一时期的支出是增加还是减少,并研究支出变化的原因和相关性。先前的研究倾向于认为,在这个“新自由主义”时期,支出有所减少。然而,本文中的历史和实证研究给出了一幅截然不同的画面。经通胀调整后,不列颠哥伦比亚省2020年的K-12公共教育支出比1970年增加了250%。与此同时,2020年的入学率仅为1970年的110%。支出增长的主要原因是该系统雇佣的教师数量的增加,这在很大程度上取决于不列颠哥伦比亚省教师联合会(BCTF)在协商班级规模和组成规则方面的成功尝试。支出增长的其他原因是各省和地区的支出重点。历届省级政府都试图通过对地区支出和教师合同进行成本控制来控制教育支出,但很少长期实现削减。支出的增加和成本控制的尝试充其量只能部分与执政党的意识形态联系在一起,右翼和左翼省级政府都开始了多年的增加和削减。需要更多的实证研究,特别是研究支出对教育公平和质量的影响,以完善不列颠哥伦比亚省的教育财政状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Examining the Virtual Leadership of Leaders in Higher Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study Educational Politics and Policy Change in Neoliberal Times: An Argumentative Discourse Analysis Flourishing School Leadership: Perspectives of Canada’s Outstanding Principals Academic Women’s Labour During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review and Thematic Analysis of the Literature Les diplômés d’immersion française et leurs motivations liées au choix de la langue dans la poursuite des études postsecondaires
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1