An analysis of nitrogen EOR screening criteria parameters based on the up-to-date review

2区 工程技术 Q1 Earth and Planetary Sciences Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111123
Amjed Hassan, Madhar Sahib Azad, Mohamed Mahmoud
{"title":"An analysis of nitrogen EOR screening criteria parameters based on the up-to-date review","authors":"Amjed Hassan,&nbsp;Madhar Sahib Azad,&nbsp;Mohamed Mahmoud","doi":"10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods are generally applied in the tertiary mode to the </span>depleted oil reservoir to increase the recovery factor through enhanced microscopic displacement and macroscopic sweep efficiency. Choosing a specific EOR method for a candidate reservoir characterized by specific rock and fluid properties is governed by standard EOR screening criteria. It is not uncommon that EOR researchers to come up with innovative ideas and/or good </span>reservoir engineering practices to extend the applicability of those methods beyond that specified by the standard criteria. As per the standard criteria., nitrogen EOR can work at its best in deeper reservoirs where the chemical and thermal method fails. Further, nitrogen EOR is preferred for light oil characterized by low viscosity, high gravity, and the presence of lighter components so that miscibility needed for enhancing the microscopic displacement could be achieved. Regarding the sweep efficiency, thin reservoirs are preferred to avoid gravity override due to the low viscosity and density of nitrogen. Despite the abundance of nitrogen and advancements made to the nitrogen-based EOR, no significant efforts were made to analyze whether those advancements have exceeded the standard screening criteria.</p><p><span>This paper attempts to narrow this gap. Initially, a detailed compilation of the relevant nitrogen EOR work performed at the laboratory, pilot, and field scale is done by extracting the results from the available literature. Then the rock and fluid properties reported in each of the compiled works are compared with that of the standard criteria's stipulation to identify and classify the parameters that are exceeding and those not exceeding the standard criteria. Then a comparative analysis is done using the reported recovery factor to provide a statement for each compilation whether those exceeding parameters have indeed improved the nitrogen EOR performance. Based on the conducted study, properties such as oil viscosity, oil gravity, thickness, and oil composition, could be exceeded only when the depth is conducive to generating high pressure. The inert nature of nitrogen makes high pressure an important requirement for inducing miscibility and therefore, the reservoir depth of more than 6000 ft, stipulated in the standard criteria remains a must for an efficient nitrogen EOR process that targets microscopic displacement efficiency. Overall, depth and therefore the pressure requirement is a major influencing factor for nitrogen EOR to operate in its best miscible mode. Most of the recent studies were conducted at high pressures in order to induce miscible </span>flooding pressure for increasing the oil recovery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920410522009755","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods are generally applied in the tertiary mode to the depleted oil reservoir to increase the recovery factor through enhanced microscopic displacement and macroscopic sweep efficiency. Choosing a specific EOR method for a candidate reservoir characterized by specific rock and fluid properties is governed by standard EOR screening criteria. It is not uncommon that EOR researchers to come up with innovative ideas and/or good reservoir engineering practices to extend the applicability of those methods beyond that specified by the standard criteria. As per the standard criteria., nitrogen EOR can work at its best in deeper reservoirs where the chemical and thermal method fails. Further, nitrogen EOR is preferred for light oil characterized by low viscosity, high gravity, and the presence of lighter components so that miscibility needed for enhancing the microscopic displacement could be achieved. Regarding the sweep efficiency, thin reservoirs are preferred to avoid gravity override due to the low viscosity and density of nitrogen. Despite the abundance of nitrogen and advancements made to the nitrogen-based EOR, no significant efforts were made to analyze whether those advancements have exceeded the standard screening criteria.

This paper attempts to narrow this gap. Initially, a detailed compilation of the relevant nitrogen EOR work performed at the laboratory, pilot, and field scale is done by extracting the results from the available literature. Then the rock and fluid properties reported in each of the compiled works are compared with that of the standard criteria's stipulation to identify and classify the parameters that are exceeding and those not exceeding the standard criteria. Then a comparative analysis is done using the reported recovery factor to provide a statement for each compilation whether those exceeding parameters have indeed improved the nitrogen EOR performance. Based on the conducted study, properties such as oil viscosity, oil gravity, thickness, and oil composition, could be exceeded only when the depth is conducive to generating high pressure. The inert nature of nitrogen makes high pressure an important requirement for inducing miscibility and therefore, the reservoir depth of more than 6000 ft, stipulated in the standard criteria remains a must for an efficient nitrogen EOR process that targets microscopic displacement efficiency. Overall, depth and therefore the pressure requirement is a major influencing factor for nitrogen EOR to operate in its best miscible mode. Most of the recent studies were conducted at high pressures in order to induce miscible flooding pressure for increasing the oil recovery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于最新评述的氮提高采收率筛选标准参数分析
提高采收率(EOR)方法一般应用于三次模式的衰竭油藏,通过提高微观驱替和宏观波及效率来提高采收率。针对具有特定岩石和流体性质的候选储层,选择特定的提高采收率方法取决于标准的提高采收率筛选标准。提高采收率研究人员提出创新的想法和/或良好的油藏工程实践,以扩大这些方法在标准标准规定之外的适用性,这并不罕见。按照标准标准。在化学和热法失效的深层油藏中,氮提高采收率效果最好。此外,对于低粘度、高比重、组分较轻的轻质油,氮提高采收率是首选,这样可以实现提高微观驱替所需的混相。考虑到波及效率,由于氮气的粘度和密度较低,薄层油藏更倾向于避免重力覆盖。尽管氮含量丰富,氮基EOR技术也取得了进步,但没有人对这些进步是否超出了标准筛选标准进行分析。本文试图缩小这一差距。首先,通过从现有文献中提取结果,详细汇编在实验室、试点和现场规模上进行的相关氮提高采收率工作。然后,将各编撰作品中报告的岩石和流体的性质与标准标准的规定进行比较,以识别和分类超过和不超过标准标准的参数。然后,利用报告的采收率进行对比分析,为每次编译提供一个说明,说明那些超出参数的参数是否确实提高了氮气的EOR性能。根据所进行的研究,只有当深度有利于产生高压时,才能超越油粘度、油比重、厚度和油成分等特性。氮气的惰性性质使得高压成为诱发混相的重要条件,因此,标准标准中规定的储层深度超过6000英尺仍然是有效的氮气EOR工艺的必要条件,以实现微观驱油效率。总的来说,深度和压力要求是影响氮气提高采收率以达到最佳混相模式的主要因素。最近的大多数研究都是在高压下进行的,目的是为了提高采收率而产生混相驱压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1511
审稿时长
13.5 months
期刊介绍: The objective of the Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering is to bridge the gap between the engineering, the geology and the science of petroleum and natural gas by publishing explicitly written articles intelligible to scientists and engineers working in any field of petroleum engineering, natural gas engineering and petroleum (natural gas) geology. An attempt is made in all issues to balance the subject matter and to appeal to a broad readership. The Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering covers the fields of petroleum (and natural gas) exploration, production and flow in its broadest possible sense. Topics include: origin and accumulation of petroleum and natural gas; petroleum geochemistry; reservoir engineering; reservoir simulation; rock mechanics; petrophysics; pore-level phenomena; well logging, testing and evaluation; mathematical modelling; enhanced oil and gas recovery; petroleum geology; compaction/diagenesis; petroleum economics; drilling and drilling fluids; thermodynamics and phase behavior; fluid mechanics; multi-phase flow in porous media; production engineering; formation evaluation; exploration methods; CO2 Sequestration in geological formations/sub-surface; management and development of unconventional resources such as heavy oil and bitumen, tight oil and liquid rich shales.
期刊最新文献
Predictive Analytical Model for Hydrate Growth Initiation Point in Multiphase Pipeline System Optimization of the Oxidative Desulphurization of Residual Oil Using Hydrogen Peroxide Terpane Characterization of Crude Oils from Niger Delta, Nigeria: A Geochemical Appraisal Editorial Board Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1