Venture capital and government involvement from a qualitative systematic literature review perspective

IF 0.7 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Acta Oeconomica Pub Date : 2021-12-08 DOI:10.1556/032.2021.00044
Erika J Aki
{"title":"Venture capital and government involvement from a qualitative systematic literature review perspective","authors":"Erika J Aki","doi":"10.1556/032.2021.00044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The financing of young start-up companies is hindered by market failures that prompt governments around the world to intervene at the venture capital market. The aim of this paper is to give a comprehensive overview on this research field based on sound systematic literature review methodology, which was never done before. We found three major themes: pure governmental venture capital involvement, governmental-private venture capital cooperation, and governmental involvement in the financing of pre-seed startups. The evaluation of the governmental efforts varies according to these themes and also the investigated geographic location. Generally, pure governmental venture capital is the most controversial theme, the government-private cooperation is mostly viewed in a positive light, while the authors almost unanimously praise the government’s efforts when financing pre-seed startups. We found that the success of governmental venture capital should not be judged based on the realized return of its investments, since profit maximalization is not its goal. The governments try to alleviate market failures at the venture capital market and transition financed startup companies to private financing. Thus, we advise researchers to use the number of this type of successful transitions as the success criteria of governmental investments.","PeriodicalId":45104,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oeconomica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oeconomica","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2021.00044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The financing of young start-up companies is hindered by market failures that prompt governments around the world to intervene at the venture capital market. The aim of this paper is to give a comprehensive overview on this research field based on sound systematic literature review methodology, which was never done before. We found three major themes: pure governmental venture capital involvement, governmental-private venture capital cooperation, and governmental involvement in the financing of pre-seed startups. The evaluation of the governmental efforts varies according to these themes and also the investigated geographic location. Generally, pure governmental venture capital is the most controversial theme, the government-private cooperation is mostly viewed in a positive light, while the authors almost unanimously praise the government’s efforts when financing pre-seed startups. We found that the success of governmental venture capital should not be judged based on the realized return of its investments, since profit maximalization is not its goal. The governments try to alleviate market failures at the venture capital market and transition financed startup companies to private financing. Thus, we advise researchers to use the number of this type of successful transitions as the success criteria of governmental investments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从质性系统文献回顾的角度看风险投资与政府介入
市场失灵阻碍了年轻初创公司的融资,促使世界各国政府干预风险投资市场。本文的目的是在完善系统的文献综述方法的基础上,对这一研究领域进行全面的综述。我们发现了三个主要主题:纯粹的政府风险投资参与、政府与私人风险投资合作以及政府参与种子前创业公司的融资。根据这些主题以及调查的地理位置,对政府努力的评价各不相同。一般来说,纯政府风险投资是最具争议的主题,政府与私营部门的合作大多被积极看待,而作者几乎一致称赞政府在为种子前创业公司融资时所做的努力。我们发现,政府风险投资的成功不应该以其投资的已实现回报来评判,因为利润最大化不是其目标。政府试图缓解风险投资市场的市场失灵,并将融资创业公司转变为私人融资。因此,我们建议研究人员使用这种类型的成功过渡的数量作为政府投资的成功标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Oeconomica
Acta Oeconomica ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Acta Oeconomica publishes articles on Eastern European and Hungarian economic transition, theoretical and general issues of the transition process, economic policy, econometrics and mathematical economics. Space is also devoted to international economics, European integration, labour economics, industrial organisation, finance and business economics.Publishes book reviews and advertisements.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the economic freedom of countries: An application of grey factor analysis Bitcoin: The nexus between regulation and recognition Drivers of moral hazard in banks An investigation of the influencing factors of value added tax collection effectiveness in EU Member States Impact of investment and R&D expenditures on company performance in the industry 4.0 era
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1