The effect of two types exercise therapy on bone mineral density and mechanical strength of osteoporotic male rats

M. Banparvari, A. Salehikia, Fateme Azarm
{"title":"The effect of two types exercise therapy on bone mineral density and mechanical strength of osteoporotic male rats","authors":"M. Banparvari, A. Salehikia, Fateme Azarm","doi":"10.29252/JBRMS.4.4.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disease with a consequent increase in bone fracture. The purpose of this study was to determine skeletal changes induced by two types of exercise therapy in osteoporotic rats. Materials and methods: Among 30 male rats, 6 of them were selected as healthy group, Then Osteoporosis induced in other rats by intraperitoneal injection of 20% ethanol solution (3g/kg/day) for 3 weeks. Osteoporotic rats divided into 4 groups: Baseline, resistance, endurance and control (n=6). The two exercise groups completed 12 weeks of training, 5 days/week according to protocols. Endurance protocol included running exercise on a treadmill for, 12 m/min, 10 to 64 min/ day. The Resistance training protocol consisted of 8 series of climbing on the 110cm vertical ladder angled at 80o with weights tied to animal tail that was increased from the 50% of the body mass of the animal in the first series to100% in the eighth series. At the end of the training, the animals were euthanized, and the BMD of the femur and the L4 + L5 vertebrae were measured using DXA and tensile max load of the tibia and compression max load of the L5 were measured applying Zwick 2.5 machine. The collected data was analyzed using paired t and one way ANOVA tests. Results: The two groups of the exercises had significantly increased femur BMD compared to controls (P=0.035, P=0.001). L4+L5 BMD in resistance training and control groups was significantly greater than endurance group (P=0.001, P=0.001). The tibia tensile maximum load and L5 maximum load in resistance group were significantly greater than control (P=0.01, P=0.03). Conclusion: Resistance training induces more effective favorable changes in bone mineral status and bone strength as compared to endurance exercise in osteoporotic male rat.","PeriodicalId":15047,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic Research in Medical Sciences","volume":"4 1","pages":"28-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Basic Research in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/JBRMS.4.4.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disease with a consequent increase in bone fracture. The purpose of this study was to determine skeletal changes induced by two types of exercise therapy in osteoporotic rats. Materials and methods: Among 30 male rats, 6 of them were selected as healthy group, Then Osteoporosis induced in other rats by intraperitoneal injection of 20% ethanol solution (3g/kg/day) for 3 weeks. Osteoporotic rats divided into 4 groups: Baseline, resistance, endurance and control (n=6). The two exercise groups completed 12 weeks of training, 5 days/week according to protocols. Endurance protocol included running exercise on a treadmill for, 12 m/min, 10 to 64 min/ day. The Resistance training protocol consisted of 8 series of climbing on the 110cm vertical ladder angled at 80o with weights tied to animal tail that was increased from the 50% of the body mass of the animal in the first series to100% in the eighth series. At the end of the training, the animals were euthanized, and the BMD of the femur and the L4 + L5 vertebrae were measured using DXA and tensile max load of the tibia and compression max load of the L5 were measured applying Zwick 2.5 machine. The collected data was analyzed using paired t and one way ANOVA tests. Results: The two groups of the exercises had significantly increased femur BMD compared to controls (P=0.035, P=0.001). L4+L5 BMD in resistance training and control groups was significantly greater than endurance group (P=0.001, P=0.001). The tibia tensile maximum load and L5 maximum load in resistance group were significantly greater than control (P=0.01, P=0.03). Conclusion: Resistance training induces more effective favorable changes in bone mineral status and bone strength as compared to endurance exercise in osteoporotic male rat.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种运动疗法对骨质疏松雄性大鼠骨密度和机械强度的影响
引言:骨质疏松症是一种系统性骨骼疾病,随之而来的是骨折的增加。本研究的目的是确定两种类型的运动治疗对骨质疏松大鼠引起的骨骼变化。材料与方法:30只雄性大鼠中,6只为健康组,其余大鼠腹腔注射20%乙醇溶液(3g/kg/天),连续3周诱发骨质疏松症。骨质疏松大鼠分为4组:基线组、抵抗组、耐力组和对照组(n=6)。两个运动组完成了12周的训练,根据协议,每周训练5天。耐力方案包括在跑步机上进行12米/分钟、10至64分钟/天的跑步锻炼。阻力训练方案包括8个系列,在角度为80°的110厘米垂直梯子上攀爬,重物系在动物尾巴上,从第一个系列中动物体重的50%增加到第八个系列中的100%。训练结束时,对动物实施安乐死,并使用DXA测量股骨和L4+L5椎骨的BMD,并使用Zwick 2.5机器测量胫骨的拉伸最大载荷和L5的压缩最大载荷。使用配对t和单向方差分析检验对收集的数据进行分析。结果:与对照组相比,两组运动组的股骨骨密度显著增加(P=0.035,P=0.001)。阻力训练组和对照组的L4+L5骨密度显著高于耐力组(P=0.001,P=0.001与耐力运动相比,在骨质疏松雄性大鼠中诱导更有效的骨矿物质状态和骨强度的有利变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigating the factors and methods of suicide in Ilam province (from 2012 to 2016) Fungal infection in foot diabetic patients Ureteral stone extraction under direct ureteroscopic vision: An alternative for routine ureteral stone management Association of low serum level of secreted frizzled-related protein 5 (SFRP5) with the presence and severity of coronary artery disease Lack of association between insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) gene polymorphism (rs35767) and power performance in professional, amateur athletes and non-athlete individuals in Iranian population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1