Stem-cell therapy for ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis in rats: a comparison of three treatment modalities

M. Sadat-Ali, Dakheel A. Al-Dakheel, Sulaiman A. AlMousa, Fawaz M Alanii, Waleed Y Ebrahim, Hussain K AlOmar, Hasan N. AlSayed, S. Acharya, Hussain Alhawaj
{"title":"Stem-cell therapy for ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis in rats: a comparison of three treatment modalities","authors":"M. Sadat-Ali, Dakheel A. Al-Dakheel, Sulaiman A. AlMousa, Fawaz M Alanii, Waleed Y Ebrahim, Hussain K AlOmar, Hasan N. AlSayed, S. Acharya, Hussain Alhawaj","doi":"10.2147/SCCAA.S204099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Recent studies have shown that ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis in rats can be reversed by infusion of osteoblasts cultured from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). This study compares the influence of MSCs, osteoblasts, and exosomes derived from osteoblasts for the treatment of osteoporosis. Methods: Osteoporosis was induced in 40 female Sprague Dawley rats by performing ovariectomy. After 12 weeks, bone marrow was harvested and MSCs separated from bone-marrow aspirate as described by Piao et al. After 15 days, autologous osteogenically differentiated cells from the MSCs were available. Exosomes were isolated from osteoblasts by modification of the technique described by Ge et al. MSCs and osteoblasts (106 cells in 0.5 mL normal saline) and exosomes (100 µg protein) were injected into the tail veins of the animals. Animals were euthanized after 12 weeks and femurs and lumbar spines dissected and analyzed using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Results: When compared to the control group, osteoblast-treated animals showed significant differences in all parameters compared, with P-values ranging between <0.002 and <0.0001. Comparison among osteoblasts, MSCs, and exosomes, showed that osteoblasts had positive and statistically significant new-bone formation. The comparison for the spine was similar to the distal femur for osteoblasts. Conclusion: This study showed robust positive bone-forming changes after osteoblast injection in the distal femur and the spine when compared to controls, MSCs, and exosomes.","PeriodicalId":44934,"journal":{"name":"Stem Cells and Cloning-Advances and Applications","volume":"12 1","pages":"17 - 25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/SCCAA.S204099","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stem Cells and Cloning-Advances and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/SCCAA.S204099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Recent studies have shown that ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis in rats can be reversed by infusion of osteoblasts cultured from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). This study compares the influence of MSCs, osteoblasts, and exosomes derived from osteoblasts for the treatment of osteoporosis. Methods: Osteoporosis was induced in 40 female Sprague Dawley rats by performing ovariectomy. After 12 weeks, bone marrow was harvested and MSCs separated from bone-marrow aspirate as described by Piao et al. After 15 days, autologous osteogenically differentiated cells from the MSCs were available. Exosomes were isolated from osteoblasts by modification of the technique described by Ge et al. MSCs and osteoblasts (106 cells in 0.5 mL normal saline) and exosomes (100 µg protein) were injected into the tail veins of the animals. Animals were euthanized after 12 weeks and femurs and lumbar spines dissected and analyzed using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Results: When compared to the control group, osteoblast-treated animals showed significant differences in all parameters compared, with P-values ranging between <0.002 and <0.0001. Comparison among osteoblasts, MSCs, and exosomes, showed that osteoblasts had positive and statistically significant new-bone formation. The comparison for the spine was similar to the distal femur for osteoblasts. Conclusion: This study showed robust positive bone-forming changes after osteoblast injection in the distal femur and the spine when compared to controls, MSCs, and exosomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
干细胞治疗大鼠卵巢切除所致骨质疏松症:三种治疗方式的比较
背景:最近的研究表明,通过输注由间充质干细胞培养的成骨细胞,可以逆转去卵巢诱导的大鼠骨质疏松症。本研究比较了MSCs、成骨细胞和来源于成骨细胞的外泌体对骨质疏松症治疗的影响。方法:对40只雌性Sprague-Dawley大鼠进行去卵巢诱导骨质疏松。12周后,如Piao等人所述,收获骨髓并从骨髓吸出物中分离MSCs。15天后,可获得来自MSCs的自体成骨分化细胞。通过修改Ge等人描述的技术从成骨细胞中分离出外泌体。将MSCs和成骨细胞(106个细胞在0.5 mL生理盐水中)和外泌体(100µg蛋白质)注射到动物的尾静脉中。12周后对动物实施安乐死,并使用高分辨率外围定量计算机断层扫描解剖和分析股骨和腰椎。结果:与对照组相比,成骨细胞治疗的动物在所有参数上都表现出显著差异,P值在<0.002和<0.0001之间。成骨细胞、间充质干细胞和外泌体之间的比较表明,成骨细胞具有阳性且具有统计学意义的新骨形成。脊椎与股骨远端成骨细胞的比较相似。结论:与对照组、MSCs和外泌体相比,本研究在股骨远端和脊柱注射成骨细胞后显示出强烈的阳性骨形成变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Autologous Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Reversal of Unobstructed Azoospermia in Rats. Assessment of the Dose-Dependent Effect of Human Platelet Lysate on Wharton's Jelly-Derived Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Culture for Manufacturing Protocols. A Comprehensive Review of Stem Cell Conditioned Media Role for Anti-Aging on Skin. Intraperitoneal Injection of Graphene Oxide Nanoparticle Accelerates Stem Cell Therapy Effects on Acute Kidney Injury [Retraction]. A Thinkful of "Alginate Beads as a Promising Tool for Successful Production of Viable and Pluripotent Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in a 3D Culture System" [Letter].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1