The (Non)Modern Imagination of a Noisy Williams

IF 0.1 N/A POETRY WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW Pub Date : 2017-05-26 DOI:10.1353/WCW.2017.0004
A. Hernandez
{"title":"The (Non)Modern Imagination of a Noisy Williams","authors":"A. Hernandez","doi":"10.1353/WCW.2017.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates William Carlos Williams's philosophical investment in relational ways of knowing the world by re-reading the poems in his 1923 collection Spring and All through the lens of the poet's prose. Bringing into focus the noisy aesthetic aims that Williams outlines in the prose passages and that are at play in the poems themselves, Spring and All is read not for what it means but for how it means, taking noisy Williams at his word and asking not how poetic language represents but how it mediates. The article extends pragmatist approaches to Williams's poetry by turning to Bruno Latour's theory of (non)modernity and new media theories in order to articulate the poet's interest in the translations and exchanges that occur beneath the binaries that moderns have produced.","PeriodicalId":53869,"journal":{"name":"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/WCW.2017.0004","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/WCW.2017.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article investigates William Carlos Williams's philosophical investment in relational ways of knowing the world by re-reading the poems in his 1923 collection Spring and All through the lens of the poet's prose. Bringing into focus the noisy aesthetic aims that Williams outlines in the prose passages and that are at play in the poems themselves, Spring and All is read not for what it means but for how it means, taking noisy Williams at his word and asking not how poetic language represents but how it mediates. The article extends pragmatist approaches to Williams's poetry by turning to Bruno Latour's theory of (non)modernity and new media theories in order to articulate the poet's interest in the translations and exchanges that occur beneath the binaries that moderns have produced.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
喧闹的威廉姆斯的(非)现代想象
本文通过对威廉·卡洛斯·威廉姆斯1923年诗集《春天与一切》中诗歌的重读,从诗人散文的角度考察了他对认识世界的关系方式的哲学投资。威廉姆斯在散文段落中概述了嘈杂的美学目标,而这些目标在诗歌本身中发挥了作用,《春天与一切》不是为了它的意思,而是为了它的含义,用嘈杂的威廉姆斯的话来说,不是问诗歌语言如何表现,而是问它如何调解。本文通过引用布鲁诺·拉图尔的(非)现代性理论和新媒体理论,将实用主义的方法扩展到威廉姆斯的诗歌中,以阐明诗人对现代人产生的二元对立之下的翻译和交流的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
“No One to Witness and Adjust”: The Academy Still in Peril Spring and All No Longer in Peril Spring and All: The Present 100 Years Later Modernist Hangover? William Carlos Williams as Bob Perelman’s Poetic Cure Which Side Are You On?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1