TeleNGAGE: Enhancing Collaboration Between Families and Schools

Katherine Curry, E. Harris, Jentre J. Olsen, Younglong Kim, Dominic Egure
{"title":"TeleNGAGE: Enhancing Collaboration Between Families and Schools","authors":"Katherine Curry, E. Harris, Jentre J. Olsen, Younglong Kim, Dominic Egure","doi":"10.14507/cie.vol24iss1.2089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Findings in the literature strongly support the importance of family engagement in education. However, effective partnerships between families and schools are rare, especially in ethnically diverse communities where families may lack efficacy or face structural challenges for engagement. Additionally, educator perspectives toward engagement are often framed by White, middle-class paradigms. Educators often fail to acknowledge structural challenges faced by low-income families or the cultural contributions low-income and/or minoritized families can bring. To facilitate engagement between families and schools, a new ECHO® line, TeleNGAGE, was developed at Oklahoma State University, Educational Leadership program. ECHO®, traditionally used in the field of medicine, has utility for professional development for educators because it offers a platform for case-based learning where real problems are addressed in real-time. Additionally, didactic presentations provide professional development for collaborative learning. Through the lens of Communities of Practice (CoP), this qualitative case study explores how relationships between families and schools changed as a result of participation in TeleNGAGE. Tenets of CoP, negotiated meaning, mutual engagement, and a shared repertoire, support a collaborative approach to addressing complex problems. Findings suggest that a CoP has emerged through TeleNGAGE and has resulted in changes in perspectives across families and educational leaders about “what it means to be engaged,” enhanced family efficacy for engagement, and changes in engagement practice as family voice has expanded through sharing of concerns/perspectives. These findings have important implications for equitable engagement in a convenient, cost-free environment where educators and families can communicate and develop mutually supportive understandings and practices.","PeriodicalId":90480,"journal":{"name":"Current issues in education (Tempe, Ariz.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current issues in education (Tempe, Ariz.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14507/cie.vol24iss1.2089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Findings in the literature strongly support the importance of family engagement in education. However, effective partnerships between families and schools are rare, especially in ethnically diverse communities where families may lack efficacy or face structural challenges for engagement. Additionally, educator perspectives toward engagement are often framed by White, middle-class paradigms. Educators often fail to acknowledge structural challenges faced by low-income families or the cultural contributions low-income and/or minoritized families can bring. To facilitate engagement between families and schools, a new ECHO® line, TeleNGAGE, was developed at Oklahoma State University, Educational Leadership program. ECHO®, traditionally used in the field of medicine, has utility for professional development for educators because it offers a platform for case-based learning where real problems are addressed in real-time. Additionally, didactic presentations provide professional development for collaborative learning. Through the lens of Communities of Practice (CoP), this qualitative case study explores how relationships between families and schools changed as a result of participation in TeleNGAGE. Tenets of CoP, negotiated meaning, mutual engagement, and a shared repertoire, support a collaborative approach to addressing complex problems. Findings suggest that a CoP has emerged through TeleNGAGE and has resulted in changes in perspectives across families and educational leaders about “what it means to be engaged,” enhanced family efficacy for engagement, and changes in engagement practice as family voice has expanded through sharing of concerns/perspectives. These findings have important implications for equitable engagement in a convenient, cost-free environment where educators and families can communicate and develop mutually supportive understandings and practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TeleNGAGE:加强家庭和学校之间的合作
文献中的研究结果有力地支持了家庭参与教育的重要性。然而,家庭和学校之间的有效伙伴关系很少,尤其是在种族多样的社区,在那里,家庭可能缺乏效率或在参与方面面临结构性挑战。此外,教育工作者对参与的看法往往是由白人中产阶级的范式所构成的。教育工作者往往没有认识到低收入家庭所面临的结构性挑战,也没有意识到低收入和/或少数族裔家庭所能带来的文化贡献。为了促进家庭和学校之间的互动,俄克拉荷马州立大学教育领导力项目开发了一条新的ECHO®线路TeleNGAGE。传统上用于医学领域的ECHO®对教育工作者的专业发展很有用,因为它提供了一个基于案例的学习平台,可以实时解决实际问题。此外,教学演示为合作学习提供了专业发展。通过实践社区(CoP)的视角,本定性案例研究探讨了家庭和学校之间的关系如何因参与TeleNGAGE而发生变化。CoP的宗旨、协商的意义、相互参与和共享的曲目,支持合作解决复杂问题。研究结果表明,通过TeleNGAGE产生了一个CoP,并导致家庭和教育领导者对“参与意味着什么”的看法发生了变化,增强了家庭参与的效力,并随着家庭通过分享关注点/观点扩大了声音,参与实践发生了变化。这些发现对公平参与一个方便、无成本的环境具有重要意义,在这个环境中,教育工作者和家庭可以交流并发展相互支持的理解和实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Canada’s Student Journal Forum: From Humble Beginnings to National Conference Improving Student Journal Visibility via the Directory of Open Access Journals Two Undergraduate Students’ Journal Reviewing Experiences Student-Led Undergraduate Journals: A Catalyst for Comprehensive Research Experience and Professional Growth Not “Just” an Undergrad: Undergraduate Journals as a Portal to Participating in Academic Discourse Communities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1