An exploratory examination of the barriers to innovation and change as perceived by senior management

Dana Alshwayat , Hamzah Elrehail , Esam Shehadeh , Nidal Alsalhi , Mohamed Dawood Shamout , Shafique Ur Rehman
{"title":"An exploratory examination of the barriers to innovation and change as perceived by senior management","authors":"Dana Alshwayat ,&nbsp;Hamzah Elrehail ,&nbsp;Esam Shehadeh ,&nbsp;Nidal Alsalhi ,&nbsp;Mohamed Dawood Shamout ,&nbsp;Shafique Ur Rehman","doi":"10.1016/j.ijis.2022.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The banking industry has undergone significant shifts as innovations have enabled new banking services and created new customer requirements. While banks strive to incorporate innovation and change systems, they also face various obstacles. The primary aim of this qualitative exploratory case study is to determine the key perceived barriers to change and innovation in a Jordanian commercial case bank from the perspective of senior management. Nuanced interpretations were investigated, resulting in new insights that have not been previously obtained from research in this field. The analysis used a qualitative systematic approach to grounded theory articulation that inductively generated new concepts while adhering to highly rigorous standards. The methodology was based on interviews with eight senior managers. The emergent findings revealed that high bureaucracy, lack of communication, lack of employee involvement, middle managers' resistance, and risk aversion were major barriers to innovation and change. Overall, this study contributes to developing a thorough understanding of top managers' perceptions of barriers to innovation and change and offers managers and practitioners guidance on improving organizational conditions to support innovation and change in the banking industry. Finally, this study provides avenues for future research in this area.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36449,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation Studies","volume":"7 2","pages":"Pages 159-170"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovation Studies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096248722000613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The banking industry has undergone significant shifts as innovations have enabled new banking services and created new customer requirements. While banks strive to incorporate innovation and change systems, they also face various obstacles. The primary aim of this qualitative exploratory case study is to determine the key perceived barriers to change and innovation in a Jordanian commercial case bank from the perspective of senior management. Nuanced interpretations were investigated, resulting in new insights that have not been previously obtained from research in this field. The analysis used a qualitative systematic approach to grounded theory articulation that inductively generated new concepts while adhering to highly rigorous standards. The methodology was based on interviews with eight senior managers. The emergent findings revealed that high bureaucracy, lack of communication, lack of employee involvement, middle managers' resistance, and risk aversion were major barriers to innovation and change. Overall, this study contributes to developing a thorough understanding of top managers' perceptions of barriers to innovation and change and offers managers and practitioners guidance on improving organizational conditions to support innovation and change in the banking industry. Finally, this study provides avenues for future research in this area.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高级管理人员对创新和变革障碍的探索性研究
银行业经历了重大转变,因为创新带来了新的银行服务,并创造了新的客户需求。银行在努力整合创新和变革体系的同时,也面临着各种障碍。本定性探索性案例研究的主要目的是从高级管理层的角度确定约旦商业案例银行变革和创新的主要障碍。对Nuanced的解释进行了调查,得出了以前从未从该领域的研究中获得的新见解。该分析使用了一种定性的系统方法来阐述有根据的理论,在遵循高度严格的标准的同时,归纳产生了新的概念。该方法基于对八名高级管理人员的访谈。新发现表明,高度官僚主义、缺乏沟通、员工缺乏参与、中层管理者的抵制和风险规避是创新和变革的主要障碍。总的来说,这项研究有助于深入了解高级管理人员对创新和变革障碍的看法,并为管理人员和从业者提供改善组织条件以支持银行业创新和变革的指导。最后,本研究为该领域的未来研究提供了途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Innovation Studies
International Journal of Innovation Studies Business, Management and Accounting-Strategy and Management
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Education program and experiential learning in Chinese entrepreneurship education: A year-long Social Cognitive Theory intervention's impact on self-efficacy and intention Evolution of policy-driven ecosystem of original innovation talents Green human resource to stimulate low carbon behaviour through the mediation role of innovation practices and organizational commitment Innovation capabilities and their dimensions: A systematic literature review The role of multidisciplinary collaborations in publishing innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1