Hazard prediction of coal and gas outburst based on the Hamming distance artificial intelligence algorithm (HDAIA)

IF 3.7 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 安全科学与韧性(英文) Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jnlssr.2022.12.001
Peng Ji , Shiliang Shi
{"title":"Hazard prediction of coal and gas outburst based on the Hamming distance artificial intelligence algorithm (HDAIA)","authors":"Peng Ji ,&nbsp;Shiliang Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.jnlssr.2022.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Currently, coal mining faces the uncertainty of the risk of coal and gas outbursts and inaccurate prediction results. Owing to this, an artificial immune algorithm (AIA) was developed for coal and gas outburst prediction based on the Hamming distance (HD) calculation method of antibody and antigen affinity called the Hamming distance artificial intelligence algorithm (HDAIA). The correlation matrix of coal and gas outburst indicators was constructed using the interpolation function in the algorithm. The HD algorithm was used to obtain the affinity between the antibody and antigen, and the minimum HD was screened to obtain the prediction result. The collected dynamic data of the drilling cuttings gas desorption index <em>K</em><sub>1</sub> and the drilling cuttings weight <em>S</em> during the excavation process of the 11,192-working face of a coal mine in Guizhou Province, China, were used as prediction indices. The results indicate that the prediction result of the HDAIA for the risk of coal and gas outbursts is consistent with the actual risk of outbursts, and it has a good prediction of the risk of coal and gas outbursts. The HDAIA can be used as a novel method for predicting the risk of coal and gas outbursts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":62710,"journal":{"name":"安全科学与韧性(英文)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"安全科学与韧性(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666449623000014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Currently, coal mining faces the uncertainty of the risk of coal and gas outbursts and inaccurate prediction results. Owing to this, an artificial immune algorithm (AIA) was developed for coal and gas outburst prediction based on the Hamming distance (HD) calculation method of antibody and antigen affinity called the Hamming distance artificial intelligence algorithm (HDAIA). The correlation matrix of coal and gas outburst indicators was constructed using the interpolation function in the algorithm. The HD algorithm was used to obtain the affinity between the antibody and antigen, and the minimum HD was screened to obtain the prediction result. The collected dynamic data of the drilling cuttings gas desorption index K1 and the drilling cuttings weight S during the excavation process of the 11,192-working face of a coal mine in Guizhou Province, China, were used as prediction indices. The results indicate that the prediction result of the HDAIA for the risk of coal and gas outbursts is consistent with the actual risk of outbursts, and it has a good prediction of the risk of coal and gas outbursts. The HDAIA can be used as a novel method for predicting the risk of coal and gas outbursts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于Hamming距离人工智能算法的煤与瓦斯突出危险性预测
目前,煤矿开采面临着煤与瓦斯突出风险的不确定性和预测结果不准确的问题。因此,基于抗体和抗原亲和力的汉明距离(HD)计算方法,开发了一种用于煤与瓦斯突出预测的人工免疫算法(AIA),称为汉明距离人工智能算法(HDAIA)。利用算法中的插值函数构造煤与瓦斯突出指标的关联矩阵。利用HD算法获得抗体与抗原的亲和力,筛选最小HD得到预测结果。以贵州某煤矿11192工作面开挖过程中采集的钻岩屑气体解吸指数K1和钻岩屑重量S动态数据作为预测指标。结果表明,HDAIA对煤与瓦斯突出危险性的预测结果与实际突出危险性吻合较好,对煤与瓦斯突出危险性有较好的预测效果。HDAIA可作为预测煤与瓦斯突出危险性的一种新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
安全科学与韧性(英文)
安全科学与韧性(英文) Management Science and Operations Research, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Safety Research
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
72 days
期刊最新文献
Grasping emergency dynamics: A review of group evacuation techniques and strategies in major emergencies Multi-factor coupled forest fire model based on cellular automata Scenario construction and vulnerability assessment of natural hazards-triggered power grid accidents Risk assessment of fire casualty in underground commercial building based on FFTA-BN model Determination of individual disaster resilience levels of hospital staff: A case study of Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kirdar City Hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1