The role and place of artillery in combating “Anti-Access/Area Denial” A2/AD systems

N. Świętochowski, Dariusz Rewak
{"title":"The role and place of artillery in combating “Anti-Access/Area Denial” A2/AD systems","authors":"N. Świętochowski, Dariusz Rewak","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0014.9797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The modern “Anti-Access/Area Denial” A2/AD systems are defined as a combination of all possible measures that can limit the ability of a potential opponent to enter and occupy a given area (operational theatre). Their action relies, among others, on radio-electronic disruption of digital guidance systems, communication, command and control systems, shooting down long-range maneuvering missiles, drones, and aircraft. The primary assumption of the anti-access concept is to deprive the enemy of the possibility of entering a given operational area (A2 – Anti-Access) through long-range destruction and depriving them of freedom of action in that theatre (AD – Area-Denial) by medium and short-range weapons. The Surface-to-Air Missiles (SAM), Anti-Ship Ballistic Missiles (ASBM), and Anti-Ship Manoeuvring Cruise Missile (ASCM) are used to carry out A2/AD tasks. Field artillery has also been used recently, particularly the Long-Range Precision Fires (LRPF).\nThe purpose of the article is to determine the chance of using field artillery against the A2/AD systems. According to the authors, the NATO forces will lose control in the air in the first period of the conventional conflict with an equivalent opponent, and its rapid recovery will be a priority. Field artillery, as a weapon with ever greater possibilities of precise and deep destruction, can become a decisive factor, allowing dominance of A2/AD systems and enabling the implementation of tasks of its air-force and army aviation, as well as ground forces.\n\n","PeriodicalId":33134,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Journal of the Military University of Land Forces","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Journal of the Military University of Land Forces","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.9797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The modern “Anti-Access/Area Denial” A2/AD systems are defined as a combination of all possible measures that can limit the ability of a potential opponent to enter and occupy a given area (operational theatre). Their action relies, among others, on radio-electronic disruption of digital guidance systems, communication, command and control systems, shooting down long-range maneuvering missiles, drones, and aircraft. The primary assumption of the anti-access concept is to deprive the enemy of the possibility of entering a given operational area (A2 – Anti-Access) through long-range destruction and depriving them of freedom of action in that theatre (AD – Area-Denial) by medium and short-range weapons. The Surface-to-Air Missiles (SAM), Anti-Ship Ballistic Missiles (ASBM), and Anti-Ship Manoeuvring Cruise Missile (ASCM) are used to carry out A2/AD tasks. Field artillery has also been used recently, particularly the Long-Range Precision Fires (LRPF). The purpose of the article is to determine the chance of using field artillery against the A2/AD systems. According to the authors, the NATO forces will lose control in the air in the first period of the conventional conflict with an equivalent opponent, and its rapid recovery will be a priority. Field artillery, as a weapon with ever greater possibilities of precise and deep destruction, can become a decisive factor, allowing dominance of A2/AD systems and enabling the implementation of tasks of its air-force and army aviation, as well as ground forces.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
火炮在对抗“反进入/区域拒绝”A2/AD系统中的作用和地位
现代的“反进入/区域拒绝”A2/AD系统被定义为所有可能措施的组合,这些措施可以限制潜在对手进入和占领给定区域(作战区)的能力。他们的行动依赖于对数字制导系统、通信、指挥和控制系统的无线电电子干扰,击落远程机动导弹、无人机和飞机。反进入概念的主要假设是通过远程摧毁剥夺敌人进入特定作战区域(A2–反进入)的可能性,并通过中短程武器剥夺他们在该战区的行动自由(AD–区域拒绝)。地对空导弹(SAM)、反舰弹道导弹(ASBM)和反舰巡航导弹(ASCM)用于执行A2/AD任务。野战炮最近也被使用,特别是远程精确火力(LRPF)。本文的目的是确定对A2/AD系统使用野战炮的机会。根据作者的说法,北约部队将在与同等对手的常规冲突的第一阶段失去对空中的控制,其快速恢复将是当务之急。野战炮作为一种具有越来越大的精确和深度杀伤可能性的武器,可以成为一个决定性因素,使A2/AD系统占据主导地位,并使其能够执行空军、陆军航空兵以及地面部队的任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Metrological problems in the study of weapon systems Social media for brand image manipulation: an automotive industry applied approach Cybersecurity of autonomous vehicles – threats and mitigation Authority of the superior commander in commanding and leading subordinates Reconversion of the personnel of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Poland in the opinion of the retired officers of the Polish Army
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1