South Africa's Revolutionary Era

IF 1 1区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Journal of African History Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1017/s002185372300049x
A. Lissoni
{"title":"South Africa's Revolutionary Era","authors":"A. Lissoni","doi":"10.1017/s002185372300049x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ation and circulation in the round. Having described anxieties about fertility and mortality, in Chapter Six he turns to migration. In a fascinating analysis of provincial reports and correspondence, Coghe builds on a core theme of the book considering Angola as an embattled colony, prone to negative comparison and subversion by neighbouring colonial powers. Anxiety about porous borders leaking workers to neighbouring territories where taxes were lower and jobs were available, led to a series of initiatives in border regions. Officials sought to capture migration flows statistically and to incentivise against them through favourable tax schemes compared with neighbouring countries and by encouraging the establishment of mission stations, which offered educational and medical opportunities to compete with mission communities across the borders. Coghe describes the tensions between provincial officials and the central colonial ministry over migration, and — following another core theme of the book — shows how demographic information was collected, managed, and transformed to suit different agendas. In his Epilogue, Coghe describes the shift in global population discourse about Africa from a fear of underpopulation in the interwar period, to growing concerns about rapid population growth and its proposed negative consequences for development post-1945. He shows how Angola largely sidestepped this wider ‘discursive reversal’ (250) right through to independence in 1975, due to the country’s continuing relatively high mortality, low population density, demand for labour, and good soil productivity. Meanwhile, ongoing Portuguese pronatalism restricted the influence of population experts and international family planning agencies throughout this period, potentially — as Coghe concludes — with a lasting legacy for Angola’s high fertility rate today. This is a carefully researched monograph, with meticulous detail on how population knowledge and policies are constructed. It reveals important themes and processes in Angolan history and colonial historiography, while also carrying lessons for today when global population anxieties are again on the rise. Coghe shows that such anxieties — and the data on which they are based — need to be analysed to reveal their racialised, gendered, and political underpinnings before policies can be enacted to truly enhance human and planetary health.","PeriodicalId":47244,"journal":{"name":"Journal of African History","volume":"64 1","pages":"316 - 320"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of African History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s002185372300049x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ation and circulation in the round. Having described anxieties about fertility and mortality, in Chapter Six he turns to migration. In a fascinating analysis of provincial reports and correspondence, Coghe builds on a core theme of the book considering Angola as an embattled colony, prone to negative comparison and subversion by neighbouring colonial powers. Anxiety about porous borders leaking workers to neighbouring territories where taxes were lower and jobs were available, led to a series of initiatives in border regions. Officials sought to capture migration flows statistically and to incentivise against them through favourable tax schemes compared with neighbouring countries and by encouraging the establishment of mission stations, which offered educational and medical opportunities to compete with mission communities across the borders. Coghe describes the tensions between provincial officials and the central colonial ministry over migration, and — following another core theme of the book — shows how demographic information was collected, managed, and transformed to suit different agendas. In his Epilogue, Coghe describes the shift in global population discourse about Africa from a fear of underpopulation in the interwar period, to growing concerns about rapid population growth and its proposed negative consequences for development post-1945. He shows how Angola largely sidestepped this wider ‘discursive reversal’ (250) right through to independence in 1975, due to the country’s continuing relatively high mortality, low population density, demand for labour, and good soil productivity. Meanwhile, ongoing Portuguese pronatalism restricted the influence of population experts and international family planning agencies throughout this period, potentially — as Coghe concludes — with a lasting legacy for Angola’s high fertility rate today. This is a carefully researched monograph, with meticulous detail on how population knowledge and policies are constructed. It reveals important themes and processes in Angolan history and colonial historiography, while also carrying lessons for today when global population anxieties are again on the rise. Coghe shows that such anxieties — and the data on which they are based — need to be analysed to reveal their racialised, gendered, and political underpinnings before policies can be enacted to truly enhance human and planetary health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非的革命时代
循环和循环。在描述了对生育率和死亡率的焦虑之后,在第六章中,他转向了移民。在对省级报告和信件的引人入胜的分析中,Coghe以本书的一个核心主题为基础,将安哥拉视为一个四面楚歌的殖民地,容易受到邻国殖民大国的负面比较和颠覆。对漏洞百出的边境将工人泄漏到税收较低、有工作机会的邻国的担忧,导致边境地区采取了一系列举措。官员们试图从统计数据上捕捉移民流动,并通过与邻国相比有利的税收计划和鼓励建立特派团驻地来激励他们,这些特派团驻地提供了教育和医疗机会,可以与跨境的特派团社区竞争。Coghe描述了省级官员和中央殖民地部在移民问题上的紧张关系,并遵循本书的另一个核心主题,展示了人口信息是如何收集、管理和转换以适应不同议程的。Coghe在他的后记中描述了全球人口对非洲的讨论从两次世界大战期间对人口不足的恐惧转变为对人口快速增长及其对1945年后发展的负面影响的日益担忧。他展示了安哥拉如何在1975年独立之前基本上避开了这种更广泛的“话语逆转”(250),因为该国的死亡率持续相对较高,人口密度较低,对劳动力的需求和良好的土壤生产力。与此同时,在这段时间里,持续的葡萄牙前生育主义限制了人口专家和国际计划生育机构的影响力,正如Coghe总结的那样,这可能会给安哥拉今天的高生育率留下持久的遗产。这是一本经过仔细研究的专著,对人口知识和政策是如何构建的有着细致的细节。它揭示了安哥拉历史和殖民史学中的重要主题和过程,同时也为全球人口焦虑再次上升的今天提供了教训。Coghe表明,在制定真正增强人类和地球健康的政策之前,需要对这种焦虑及其所依据的数据进行分析,以揭示其种族化、性别化和政治基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of African History publishes articles and book reviews ranging widely over the African past, from the late Stone Age to the present. In recent years increasing prominence has been given to economic, cultural and social history and several articles have explored themes which are also of growing interest to historians of other regions such as: gender roles, demography, health and hygiene, propaganda, legal ideology, labour histories, nationalism and resistance, environmental history, the construction of ethnicity, slavery and the slave trade, and photographs as historical sources. Contributions dealing with pre-colonial historical relationships between Africa and the African diaspora are especially welcome, as are historical approaches to the post-colonial period.
期刊最新文献
Subpectoral proximal humeral anatomy: Guidance to decrease risk of fracture following subpectoral biceps tenodesis. ‘For King and Empire’: The Changing Political, Economic, and Cultural Identities of Kru Mariners in Atlantic Africa, 1460–1945 Lugha ya Dunia South Africa's Revolutionary Era William A. Brown and the Assessment of a Scholarly Life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1