Moral Stress and Moral Agency in Swedish Eldercare

Magdalena Elmersjö, Sara Hultqvist, K. Hollertz
{"title":"Moral Stress and Moral Agency in Swedish Eldercare","authors":"Magdalena Elmersjö, Sara Hultqvist, K. Hollertz","doi":"10.7565/ssp.v5.6618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ageing population, high levels of sick leave among eldercare personnel and financial constraints on municipal budgets impact eldercare. Daily care work is complex and ethical dilemmas are constantly present for eldercare personnel. This project aims to a) identify situations that give rise to moral stress, b) study the relationship between moral stress and moral agency c) explore how moral agency can be fostered in eldercare. The argument underpinning this research project is that ethical dilemmas in the work cause moral stress among staff in eldercare. While much research on moral stress highlights the connection between moral stress and negative effects on health and wellbeing, our focus is on the possible connection between moral stress and moral agency. Moral agency encompasses cognitive capacity, feelings, skills, and actions. \nMethods/Design: This project has a systemic approach to eldercare and interprets eldercare as an advanced system where a range of different skills is required. Participatory action research (PAR) will be used as an overall methodology. Focus-groups and research circles will be conducted with care workers, first line manages and needs assessors.  \nDiscussion: An ongoing discussion on relevant knowledge production in research, stresses the importance of participation. This is expressed by concepts such as deliberative democracy, user participation, empowerment, collaboration, follow-up research and citizen dialogue. In our research project we refer to robust knowledge as relevant knowledge that is valid in the eyes of care workers, care municipal needs assessors and first line managers. As the research is performed in collaboration with these three vocational groups, local politicians, and trade unions in three municipalities as well as two educational settings, different sorts of knowledge will be present. This unique stand will show how moral agency, as a response to moral stress, can be the ground for social changes and improve quality of care.","PeriodicalId":74825,"journal":{"name":"Social science protocols","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social science protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7565/ssp.v5.6618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Ageing population, high levels of sick leave among eldercare personnel and financial constraints on municipal budgets impact eldercare. Daily care work is complex and ethical dilemmas are constantly present for eldercare personnel. This project aims to a) identify situations that give rise to moral stress, b) study the relationship between moral stress and moral agency c) explore how moral agency can be fostered in eldercare. The argument underpinning this research project is that ethical dilemmas in the work cause moral stress among staff in eldercare. While much research on moral stress highlights the connection between moral stress and negative effects on health and wellbeing, our focus is on the possible connection between moral stress and moral agency. Moral agency encompasses cognitive capacity, feelings, skills, and actions. Methods/Design: This project has a systemic approach to eldercare and interprets eldercare as an advanced system where a range of different skills is required. Participatory action research (PAR) will be used as an overall methodology. Focus-groups and research circles will be conducted with care workers, first line manages and needs assessors.  Discussion: An ongoing discussion on relevant knowledge production in research, stresses the importance of participation. This is expressed by concepts such as deliberative democracy, user participation, empowerment, collaboration, follow-up research and citizen dialogue. In our research project we refer to robust knowledge as relevant knowledge that is valid in the eyes of care workers, care municipal needs assessors and first line managers. As the research is performed in collaboration with these three vocational groups, local politicians, and trade unions in three municipalities as well as two educational settings, different sorts of knowledge will be present. This unique stand will show how moral agency, as a response to moral stress, can be the ground for social changes and improve quality of care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞典老年人护理中的道德压力和道德能动性
背景:人口老龄化,老年护理人员的高水平病假和市政预算的财政限制影响老年护理。日常护理工作是复杂的,对老年护理人员来说,道德困境不断出现。本项目旨在a)识别产生道德压力的情况,b)研究道德压力与道德能动性之间的关系,c)探索如何在老年护理中培养道德能动性。支持这项研究项目的论点是,工作中的道德困境会导致老年人护理工作人员的道德压力。虽然许多关于道德压力的研究都强调道德压力与对健康和福祉的负面影响之间的联系,但我们的重点是道德压力与道德代理之间的可能联系。道德能动性包括认知能力、感觉、技能和行动。方法/设计:本项目采用系统的老年护理方法,并将老年护理解释为需要一系列不同技能的高级系统。参与性行动研究(PAR)将被用作一种总体方法。焦点小组和研究小组将与护理人员、一线管理人员和需求评估人员一起开展工作。讨论:正在进行的关于研究中相关知识生产的讨论,强调了参与的重要性。这体现在协商民主、用户参与、授权、协作、后续研究和公民对话等概念上。在我们的研究项目中,我们将稳健知识称为在护理工作者、护理市政需求评估者和一线管理人员眼中有效的相关知识。由于该研究是与这三个职业团体、三个城市的地方政治家和工会以及两个教育机构合作进行的,因此将存在不同种类的知识。这一独特的立场将表明,作为对道德压力的反应,道德能动性如何能够成为社会变革和提高护理质量的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social Networks and Support to Older People in Refugee Situation in Western Countries A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Relationships among Post-secondary Students’ Attitudes Toward Statistics and Statistics Achievement Moral Stress and Moral Agency in Swedish Eldercare Study Protocol: Development and Validation of a Framework on the Personality Characteristics of High-Potential Employees (Hi-pots) The Use of Synchronous Videoconference in Bipolar Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1