Reconstruction of scalp defects in electrical burns: Challenges and options

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Head & Neck Physicians and Surgeons Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jhnps.jhnps_63_20
K. Aithal, U. Jena, Sravya Vasireddy, Sravani Muddada, P. Sudhakar
{"title":"Reconstruction of scalp defects in electrical burns: Challenges and options","authors":"K. Aithal, U. Jena, Sravya Vasireddy, Sravani Muddada, P. Sudhakar","doi":"10.4103/jhnps.jhnps_63_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Electrical burn injury in India comprises a fair percentage of overall burn injuries, and they cause significant morbidity. Reconstruction of scalp defects often poses challenges to the plastic surgeon regarding the timing of surgery, choice of reconstruction, and postoperative management. The objective of this article is to throw light on various options for reconstruction of scalp defects as the involvement leads to significant morbidity. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted at a tertiary burn care unit. The period of this study was from 2016 to 2019. Retrospective analysis was done. Results: In this study, retrospective analysis of 40 cases of scalp burns was evaluated from 2016 to 2019. Out of these, 6 patients were managed with primary suturing, 8 patients underwent split-thickness skin graft, 24 patients required local flaps, and 2 patients were managed with extracorporeal radial forearm flap. There were no major complications. Minor complications like wound infection were seen in five of the local flap patients which were managed with antibiotics and regular dressing. Two patients had partial flap loss which was revised and managed conservatively. All flaps healed well. There was hair loss patch evident in patients where split-thickness graft was used. Conclusion: Thorough debridement of the wound is necessary in electrical burns. Smaller scalp wounds can be managed with split-thickness skin graft and local flaps, but larger defects should be managed with distant flaps and free flaps. This study shows that local flaps are the ideal choice for reconstruction of scalp defects due to their easy availability, minimal complications, and acceptable cosmesis.","PeriodicalId":41774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head & Neck Physicians and Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Head & Neck Physicians and Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jhnps.jhnps_63_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Electrical burn injury in India comprises a fair percentage of overall burn injuries, and they cause significant morbidity. Reconstruction of scalp defects often poses challenges to the plastic surgeon regarding the timing of surgery, choice of reconstruction, and postoperative management. The objective of this article is to throw light on various options for reconstruction of scalp defects as the involvement leads to significant morbidity. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted at a tertiary burn care unit. The period of this study was from 2016 to 2019. Retrospective analysis was done. Results: In this study, retrospective analysis of 40 cases of scalp burns was evaluated from 2016 to 2019. Out of these, 6 patients were managed with primary suturing, 8 patients underwent split-thickness skin graft, 24 patients required local flaps, and 2 patients were managed with extracorporeal radial forearm flap. There were no major complications. Minor complications like wound infection were seen in five of the local flap patients which were managed with antibiotics and regular dressing. Two patients had partial flap loss which was revised and managed conservatively. All flaps healed well. There was hair loss patch evident in patients where split-thickness graft was used. Conclusion: Thorough debridement of the wound is necessary in electrical burns. Smaller scalp wounds can be managed with split-thickness skin graft and local flaps, but larger defects should be managed with distant flaps and free flaps. This study shows that local flaps are the ideal choice for reconstruction of scalp defects due to their easy availability, minimal complications, and acceptable cosmesis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电烧伤头皮缺损的重建:挑战和选择
引言:在印度,电烧伤在烧伤总数中占相当大的比例,并且会导致严重的发病率。头皮缺损的重建通常会给整形外科医生带来手术时机、重建选择和术后管理方面的挑战。这篇文章的目的是阐明头皮缺损重建的各种选择,因为这种受累会导致显著的发病率。材料和方法:该研究在三级烧伤护理室进行。本研究时间为2016年至2019年。进行回顾性分析。结果:本研究对2016年至2019年40例头皮烧伤病例进行了回顾性分析。其中,6例患者采用一次缝合,8例患者采用分层植皮,24例患者需要局部皮瓣,2例患者采用前臂桡侧皮瓣。没有出现重大并发症。五名局部皮瓣患者出现了轻微并发症,如伤口感染,这些患者接受了抗生素和常规敷料治疗。两名患者出现部分皮瓣丢失,经保守治疗。所有皮瓣愈合良好。使用中厚移植物的患者有明显的脱发斑。结论:电烧伤创面应彻底清创。较小的头皮伤口可以用分层植皮和局部皮瓣处理,但较大的缺损应该用远处皮瓣和游离皮瓣处理。这项研究表明,局部皮瓣是重建头皮缺损的理想选择,因为它们易于获得,并发症最小,美容效果可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Head & Neck Physicians and Surgeons
Journal of Head & Neck Physicians and Surgeons MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
High-grade sarcoma of the hyoid bone: An unusual case illustrating the challenges faced by the pathologist to arrive at a diagnosis Circulating tumor cells in oral squamous cell carcinoma – Current status of its usefulness in clinical practice Is awake videoscope-assisted bougie-guided intubation superior to fiberoptic intubation in patients with carcinoma larynx? Biochemical and molecular characteristics of Porphyromonas gingivalis a key causative pathogen in periodontitis Oral health status of individuals affected with chronic kidney disease: A cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1