Labour Movements and the Effectiveness of Legal Strategy: Three Tenets

IF 0.8 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.54648/ijcl2022009

J. Meakin

{"title":"Labour Movements and the Effectiveness of Legal Strategy: Three Tenets","authors":"J. Meakin","doi":"10.54648/ijcl2022009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social movements of every stripe have mobilized law in order to confront contemporary injustices and redetermine social experiences and expectations. The multiple disciplinary literatures that track and evaluate these strategies provide a rich picture of legal and political mobilization at different scales and relative successes. This article draws together the shared concern for strategic litigation of labour law and legal mobilization scholars in order to confront and rationalize the factors that determine its effectiveness for labour movements. This article sets out three core tenets of strategic litigation to provide a framework for analysing its potential effectiveness: Effective legal arguments; state law’s institutional capacity; and political objectives. Drawing on interdisciplinary insights, these tenets present a sober conception of the ways that law is mobilized by labour movements, to provide a critical conception of the opportunities and limitations of their strategic uses of law.\nLegal Mobilization, Labour Movements, Institutional Capacity, Political Objectives, Employment Status, Uber Drivers, Limb B Workers","PeriodicalId":44213,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ijcl2022009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social movements of every stripe have mobilized law in order to confront contemporary injustices and redetermine social experiences and expectations. The multiple disciplinary literatures that track and evaluate these strategies provide a rich picture of legal and political mobilization at different scales and relative successes. This article draws together the shared concern for strategic litigation of labour law and legal mobilization scholars in order to confront and rationalize the factors that determine its effectiveness for labour movements. This article sets out three core tenets of strategic litigation to provide a framework for analysing its potential effectiveness: Effective legal arguments; state law’s institutional capacity; and political objectives. Drawing on interdisciplinary insights, these tenets present a sober conception of the ways that law is mobilized by labour movements, to provide a critical conception of the opportunities and limitations of their strategic uses of law. Legal Mobilization, Labour Movements, Institutional Capacity, Political Objectives, Employment Status, Uber Drivers, Limb B Workers

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

劳工运动与法律策略的有效性:三个原则

各种各样的社会运动都动员了法律，以对抗当代的不公正，并重新确定社会经验和期望。跟踪和评估这些策略的多学科文献提供了不同规模和相对成功的法律和政治动员的丰富图景。本文汇集了劳工法战略诉讼和法律动员学者共同关注的问题，以面对和合理化决定其对劳工运动有效性的因素。本文提出了战略诉讼的三个核心原则，为分析其潜在效力提供了一个框架:有效的法律论据;国家法律的制度能力;还有政治目标。借鉴跨学科的见解，这些原则提出了一个清醒的概念，即法律是由劳工运动动员的方式，提供他们的战略使用法律的机会和限制的关键概念。法律动员，劳工运动，机构能力，政治目标，就业状况，优步司机，肢体B工人

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Published four times a year, the International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations is an essential source of information and analysis for labour lawyers, academics, judges, policymakers and others. The Journal publishes original articles in the domains of labour law (broadly understood) and industrial relations. Articles cover comparative and international (or regional) analysis of topical issues, major developments and innovative practices, as well as discussions of theoretical and methodological approaches. The Journal adopts a double-blind peer review process. A distinguished editorial team, with the support of an International Advisory Board of eminent scholars from around the world, ensures a continuing high standard of scientific research dealing with a range of important issues.