Marine Ecosystem Bodies as Entangled Environments and Entangled Laws: Drones and the Marine Environment

IF 1.2 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AJIL Unbound Pub Date : 2023-06-26 DOI:10.1017/aju.2023.19
Gabriela Argüello, M. Arvidsson, N. Krabbe
{"title":"Marine Ecosystem Bodies as Entangled Environments and Entangled Laws: Drones and the Marine Environment","authors":"Gabriela Argüello, M. Arvidsson, N. Krabbe","doi":"10.1017/aju.2023.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The adoption of the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and the steady development of international environmental law in the twentieth century shaped the marine environment as an object of legal protection. However, the exponential growth of substantive obligations to protect the marine environment, conserve marine biodiversity, and prevent marine pollution, has been largely ineffective due to lack of enforcement. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) deployed for marine environmental protection are seen, in scholarship and policy, as a means to close the enforcement gap, thereby revolutionizing the field by significantly increasing states’ maritime awareness. In contrast, our tentative analysis shows that while UAVs can translate complex environmental concerns into data readily available for analysis and action, such datafication of marine environments comes with high risks. More specifically, datafication enables multiple uses of gathered data, including for surveillance, military, and commercial purposes. These concerns tend to fall outside current debates on the international regulation of the use of UAVs in marine environments. In our essay, we explore whether international law recognizes the possibilities and risks involved in deploying UAVs into the marine environment. We draw on doctrinal and posthuman feminist legal approaches to analyze how UAVs interact with the wider context of “marine ecosystem bodies” in terms of international law, as well as how those terms may need to be reconfigured to accommodate the complexity of the many actors, agents, and materials of marine ecosystems.","PeriodicalId":36818,"journal":{"name":"AJIL Unbound","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJIL Unbound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2023.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The adoption of the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and the steady development of international environmental law in the twentieth century shaped the marine environment as an object of legal protection. However, the exponential growth of substantive obligations to protect the marine environment, conserve marine biodiversity, and prevent marine pollution, has been largely ineffective due to lack of enforcement. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) deployed for marine environmental protection are seen, in scholarship and policy, as a means to close the enforcement gap, thereby revolutionizing the field by significantly increasing states’ maritime awareness. In contrast, our tentative analysis shows that while UAVs can translate complex environmental concerns into data readily available for analysis and action, such datafication of marine environments comes with high risks. More specifically, datafication enables multiple uses of gathered data, including for surveillance, military, and commercial purposes. These concerns tend to fall outside current debates on the international regulation of the use of UAVs in marine environments. In our essay, we explore whether international law recognizes the possibilities and risks involved in deploying UAVs into the marine environment. We draw on doctrinal and posthuman feminist legal approaches to analyze how UAVs interact with the wider context of “marine ecosystem bodies” in terms of international law, as well as how those terms may need to be reconfigured to accommodate the complexity of the many actors, agents, and materials of marine ecosystems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海洋生态系统体作为纠缠环境与纠缠规律:无人机与海洋环境
1982年《联合国海洋法公约》的通过和二十世纪国际环境法的稳步发展,使海洋环境成为法律保护的对象。然而,由于缺乏执行,保护海洋环境、养护海洋生物多样性和防止海洋污染的实质性义务呈指数级增长,在很大程度上是无效的。在学术和政策上,部署用于海洋环境保护的无人机被视为缩小执法差距的一种手段,从而通过显著提高各国的海洋意识来彻底改变这一领域。相比之下,我们的初步分析表明,虽然无人机可以将复杂的环境问题转化为易于分析和行动的数据,但这种海洋环境数据化具有很高的风险。更具体地说,数据化允许对收集的数据进行多种用途,包括用于监视、军事和商业目的。这些担忧往往不在当前关于无人机在海洋环境中使用的国际监管的辩论范围内。在我们的文章中,我们探讨了国际法是否承认在海洋环境中部署无人机的可能性和风险。我们借鉴理论和后人类女权主义法律方法,分析无人机如何与国际法中更广泛的“海洋生态系统体”互动,以及这些术语可能需要如何重新配置,以适应海洋生态系统的许多参与者、主体和材料的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AJIL Unbound
AJIL Unbound Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Introduction to the Symposium on International Laws Public and Private The Private as a Core Part of International Law: The School of Salamanca, Slavery, and Marriage (Sixteenth Century) Gendering Public and Private International Law: Transversal Legal Histories of the State, Market, and the Family through Women's Private Property Rights Lawyers, Archivists, and the Turn to Transparency in the French State Foreign Relations Law as a Method of Private International Law's Theoretical Self-Reflection and Critique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1