Incoherency between the clinical condition and the chest X-ray result in COVID-19 patients: a case series

IF 0.2 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care Pub Date : 2021-12-12 DOI:10.35975/apic.v25i6.1710
S. Permana, D. Aditianingsih, Muhammad Husni Thamrin, A. -, P. -
{"title":"Incoherency between the clinical condition and the chest X-ray result in COVID-19 patients: a case series","authors":"S. Permana, D. Aditianingsih, Muhammad Husni Thamrin, A. -, P. -","doi":"10.35975/apic.v25i6.1710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the routine dependence upon chest X–ray (CXR) to monitor COVID-10 patients’ condition, we found that CXR and the clinical condition of some patients were incoherent, especially regarding the need of oxygen supplementation. In our patients, the incoherency was found in three patients, although, the PCR test result was still positive. In the first patient, we noted from the CXR that the pulmonary infiltrate was getting worse, but the oxygen demand was getting less and the PaO2/FiO2 was getting better on Day 4. For the second patient it happened on Day 4 and 5. In our third patient, it happened on the Day 6 and 11. All of the patients were cured and discharged home safely. \nOur finding indicates that we have to rely more on the clinical condition and subjective complaints of the patients, rather than CXR results to evaluate the therapy because there may be an incoherency between the two. \nKey word: COVID-19; Timeline; Incoherency; Clinical condition \nCitation: Permana SA, Aditianingsih D, Thamrin MH, Arifin, Purwoko. Incoherency between the clinical condition and chest X-ray result in COVID-19 patients: a case series. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;25(6):798–803 ; \nDOI: 10.35975/apic.v25i6.1710 \nReceived: September 11, 2021, Reviewed: September 22, 2021, Accepted: September 24, 2021","PeriodicalId":7735,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v25i6.1710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the routine dependence upon chest X–ray (CXR) to monitor COVID-10 patients’ condition, we found that CXR and the clinical condition of some patients were incoherent, especially regarding the need of oxygen supplementation. In our patients, the incoherency was found in three patients, although, the PCR test result was still positive. In the first patient, we noted from the CXR that the pulmonary infiltrate was getting worse, but the oxygen demand was getting less and the PaO2/FiO2 was getting better on Day 4. For the second patient it happened on Day 4 and 5. In our third patient, it happened on the Day 6 and 11. All of the patients were cured and discharged home safely. Our finding indicates that we have to rely more on the clinical condition and subjective complaints of the patients, rather than CXR results to evaluate the therapy because there may be an incoherency between the two. Key word: COVID-19; Timeline; Incoherency; Clinical condition Citation: Permana SA, Aditianingsih D, Thamrin MH, Arifin, Purwoko. Incoherency between the clinical condition and chest X-ray result in COVID-19 patients: a case series. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;25(6):798–803 ; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v25i6.1710 Received: September 11, 2021, Reviewed: September 22, 2021, Accepted: September 24, 2021
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎患者的临床状况与胸部X光检查结果之间的不一致:一个病例系列
尽管常规依赖胸部X射线(CXR)来监测COVID-10患者的病情,但我们发现CXR与一些患者的临床病情不一致,尤其是在补充氧气的需求方面。在我们的患者中,在三名患者中发现了不连贯,尽管PCR检测结果仍然呈阳性。在第一例患者中,我们从CXR中注意到,肺部浸润越来越严重,但氧气需求越来越少,第4天的PaO2/FiO2也越来越好。第二名患者发生在第4天和第5天。在我们的第三名患者中,它发生在第6天和第11天。所有的病人都治愈了,并安全出院回家。我们的发现表明,我们必须更多地依赖患者的临床状况和主观抱怨,而不是CXR结果来评估治疗,因为两者之间可能存在不连贯性。关键词:新冠肺炎;时间线;语无伦次;临床状况引文:Permana SA,Aditianingsih D,Thamrin MH,Arifin,Purwoko。新冠肺炎患者的临床状况和胸部X光检查结果不一致:病例系列。Anaesth。疼痛重症监护2021;25(6):798–803;DOI:10.35975/apic.v25i6.1710接收日期:2021年9月11日,审核日期:2021月22日,接受日期:2021
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
NSAIDs in COVID-19, friend or foe? Post cervical spine surgery hyperpyrexia (108?F) in a patient with COVID-19: a case report Extreme physical exhaustion leading to hypokalemic periodic paralysis- a case report Difficult airway management in Apert syndrome for maxillofacial reconstruction: a case report Anesthesia without opioids
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1