Pub Date : 2023-01-31DOI: 10.35975/apic.v27i1.2123
Reham Mahrous, Amr Abdelnasser, Raghda Fouda, Mohamed Abd Al Moniem Morsy, Omnia Mandour
At the beginning of COVID-19 pandemic the use of NSAIDS was avoided. This was because the previous studies suggesting that NSAIDs may be associated with increased risk of complications of lower respiratory tract infections. Later on studies involved the patients who used NSAIDs for some chronic conditions and showed no additional harm among these patients. Then many studied assessed the benefit of using NSAIDs in COVID-19 patients for management of pain and fever and showed no additional risk among these patients.
Key words: COVID-19; pandemic; NSAIDs
Citation: Mahrous R, Abdelnasser A, Fouda R, Morsy MAAM, Mandour O. NSAIDs in COVID-19, friend or foe? Anaesth. pain intensive care 2022;27(1):119−122; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v27i1.2123
Received: May 29, 2022; Reviewed: June 28, 2022; Accepted: July 03, 2022
在COVID-19大流行开始时,避免使用非甾体抗炎药。这是因为先前的研究表明,非甾体抗炎药可能与下呼吸道感染并发症的风险增加有关。后来的研究涉及使用非甾体抗炎药治疗某些慢性疾病的患者,并没有显示这些患者有额外的危害。随后,许多研究评估了在COVID-19患者中使用非甾体抗炎药治疗疼痛和发烧的益处,并显示这些患者没有额外的风险。
关键词:COVID-19;大流行;非甾体抗炎药# x0D;引用本文:Mahrous R, Abdelnasser A, Fouda R, Morsy MAAM, Mandour O. nsaid在COVID-19中的作用:是敌是友?Anaesth。疼痛重症监护2022;27(1):119−122;DOI: 10.35975 / apic.v27i1.2123& # x0D;收稿日期:2022年5月29日;审核时间:2022年6月28日;录用日期:2022年7月3日
{"title":"NSAIDs in COVID-19, friend or foe?","authors":"Reham Mahrous, Amr Abdelnasser, Raghda Fouda, Mohamed Abd Al Moniem Morsy, Omnia Mandour","doi":"10.35975/apic.v27i1.2123","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v27i1.2123","url":null,"abstract":"At the beginning of COVID-19 pandemic the use of NSAIDS was avoided. This was because the previous studies suggesting that NSAIDs may be associated with increased risk of complications of lower respiratory tract infections. Later on studies involved the patients who used NSAIDs for some chronic conditions and showed no additional harm among these patients. Then many studied assessed the benefit of using NSAIDs in COVID-19 patients for management of pain and fever and showed no additional risk among these patients.
 Key words: COVID-19; pandemic; NSAIDs
 Citation: Mahrous R, Abdelnasser A, Fouda R, Morsy MAAM, Mandour O. NSAIDs in COVID-19, friend or foe? Anaesth. pain intensive care 2022;27(1):119−122; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v27i1.2123
 Received: May 29, 2022; Reviewed: June 28, 2022; Accepted: July 03, 2022","PeriodicalId":7735,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135395449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.35975/apic.v27i2.2045
Mbbs Nimisha Cherunghattil, MD Chinmaya K. Panda, H. M. R. K. Pdf, Dnb Idccm Fellow Niv Mishal Dhawan Md, R. HabibM., Karim, D. Habib, Reazaul Karim
Perioperative hyperpyrexia raises many questions and can cause permanent brain damage if left untreated. Malignant hyperthermia (MH), although uncommon, but sporadic cases continue to happen and it is potentially life-threatening. It is characterized by sudden rise of body temperatures to above 106 degrees F or even more, and hypercapnia. It is usually associated with anesthetic exposure. However, not every hyperpyrexia is MH;a clinical examination, risk stratification, scoring, and logical approach are required to exclude MH in the postoperative patient. We present a case of rare postoperative hyperpyrexia caused by COVID-19. The patient underwent uneventful spine surgery under general anesthesia and developed hyperpyrexia on the first postoperative day. The case highlights the importance of a logical and systematic approach for excluding the causes of postoperative hyperpyrexia and aggressive management.
{"title":"Post cervical spine surgery hyperpyrexia (108?F) in a patient with COVID-19: a case report","authors":"Mbbs Nimisha Cherunghattil, MD Chinmaya K. Panda, H. M. R. K. Pdf, Dnb Idccm Fellow Niv Mishal Dhawan Md, R. HabibM., Karim, D. Habib, Reazaul Karim","doi":"10.35975/apic.v27i2.2045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v27i2.2045","url":null,"abstract":"Perioperative hyperpyrexia raises many questions and can cause permanent brain damage if left untreated. Malignant hyperthermia (MH), although uncommon, but sporadic cases continue to happen and it is potentially life-threatening. It is characterized by sudden rise of body temperatures to above 106 degrees F or even more, and hypercapnia. It is usually associated with anesthetic exposure. However, not every hyperpyrexia is MH;a clinical examination, risk stratification, scoring, and logical approach are required to exclude MH in the postoperative patient. We present a case of rare postoperative hyperpyrexia caused by COVID-19. The patient underwent uneventful spine surgery under general anesthesia and developed hyperpyrexia on the first postoperative day. The case highlights the importance of a logical and systematic approach for excluding the causes of postoperative hyperpyrexia and aggressive management.","PeriodicalId":7735,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90936737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-04-02DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i1.1782
Monjuri Borkotokey, K. Dutta
Sudden onset limb weakness in a young individual requires a thorough evaluation and prompt diagnosis. Delay in treatment awaiting CT scan reports or laboratory investigations can lead to complications. Our case report stresses upon the clinicians to consider hypokalemic periodic paralysis in the differential diagnosis in evaluating such patients. Classical ECG changes and blood gas analysis can effectively diagnose hypokalemia and institute gradual correction of the electrolyte abnormality. In a very rare incident, our patient developed hypokalemia after strenuous exercise. Key words: Hypokalemic periodic paralysis; Hypokalemia; Flaccid paralysis; Exhaustion Citation: Borkotokey M, Dutta K. Extreme physical exhaustion leading to hypokalemic periodic paralysis- a case report. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2022;26(1):123-125. DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i1.1782 Received: November 30, 2021, Reviewed: December 25, 2021,, Accepted December 27, 2021
{"title":"Extreme physical exhaustion leading to hypokalemic periodic paralysis- a case report","authors":"Monjuri Borkotokey, K. Dutta","doi":"10.35975/apic.v26i1.1782","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v26i1.1782","url":null,"abstract":"Sudden onset limb weakness in a young individual requires a thorough evaluation and prompt diagnosis. Delay in treatment awaiting CT scan reports or laboratory investigations can lead to complications. Our case report stresses upon the clinicians to consider hypokalemic periodic paralysis in the differential diagnosis in evaluating such patients. Classical ECG changes and blood gas analysis can effectively diagnose hypokalemia and institute gradual correction of the electrolyte abnormality. In a very rare incident, our patient developed hypokalemia after strenuous exercise. \u0000Key words: Hypokalemic periodic paralysis; Hypokalemia; Flaccid paralysis; Exhaustion \u0000Citation: Borkotokey M, Dutta K. Extreme physical exhaustion leading to hypokalemic periodic paralysis- a case report. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2022;26(1):123-125. \u0000DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i1.1782 \u0000Received: November 30, 2021, Reviewed: December 25, 2021,, Accepted December 27, 2021","PeriodicalId":7735,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43172823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-04-02DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i1.1781
Purwoko Purwoko, Andre Azhar, S. Permana
Apert syndrome (AS) is an autosomal dominant disease associated with several craniofacial and limb deformities. Craniofacial deformities in AS patients requiring surgery are usually associated with difficult airway management. We report a case of a 21-year-old male patient, ASA III, with AS, who had a mandibular fracture and reconstruction was planned. The patient had all the features of AS. He had no comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Awake intubation with fiberoptic bronchoscope was planned. In these patients with AS, intravenous access might also be difficult due to limb deformities. Some surgical procedures make intravenous access even more difficult. Rarely, if intravenous access is judged to be mandatory in an emergency, intraosseous or intramuscular access may be an alternative. Abbreviations: AS - Apert syndrome; ED - emergency department; MSCT - Multislice Computerized Tomography Key words: Apert syndrome; Acrocephalosyndactylia / diagnostic imaging; Acrocephalosyndactylia / pathology; Syndactyly / pathology; Maxillofacial reconstruction, Airway management Citation: Purwoko P, Azhar A, Permana SA. Difficult airway management in Apert syndrome for maxillofacial reconstruction: a case report. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;26(1):119-122. DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i1.1781 Received: October 27, 2021, Reviewed: November 11, 2021, Accepted: November 14, 2021
Apert综合征(AS)是一种常染色体显性遗传病,与几种颅面和肢体畸形相关。需要手术的AS患者颅面畸形通常与困难的气道管理有关。我们报告一例21岁男性患者,ASA III, AS,谁有下颌骨骨折和重建计划。患者具有AS的所有特征。无高血压、糖尿病等合并症。计划在纤维支气管镜下进行清醒插管。在这些AS患者中,由于肢体畸形,静脉注射也可能很困难。一些外科手术使得静脉注射更加困难。很少情况下,如果紧急情况下静脉注射被认为是强制性的,骨内或肌肉内注射可能是另一种选择。缩写:AS - Apert综合征;ED—急诊科;【关键词】Apert综合征;肩头并指症/诊断影像;首趾并指症/病理;并指/病理;引用文献:Purwoko P, Azhar A, Permana SA。颌面部重建术中Apert综合征气道管理困难1例。Anaesth。疼痛重症监护2021;26(1):119-122。收稿日期:2021年10月27日,评审日期:2021年11月11日,收稿日期:2021年11月14日
{"title":"Difficult airway management in Apert syndrome for maxillofacial reconstruction: a case report","authors":"Purwoko Purwoko, Andre Azhar, S. Permana","doi":"10.35975/apic.v26i1.1781","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v26i1.1781","url":null,"abstract":"Apert syndrome (AS) is an autosomal dominant disease associated with several craniofacial and limb deformities. Craniofacial deformities in AS patients requiring surgery are usually associated with difficult airway management. We report a case of a 21-year-old male patient, ASA III, with AS, who had a mandibular fracture and reconstruction was planned. The patient had all the features of AS. He had no comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Awake intubation with fiberoptic bronchoscope was planned. In these patients with AS, intravenous access might also be difficult due to limb deformities. Some surgical procedures make intravenous access even more difficult. Rarely, if intravenous access is judged to be mandatory in an emergency, intraosseous or intramuscular access may be an alternative. \u0000Abbreviations: AS - Apert syndrome; ED - emergency department; MSCT - Multislice Computerized Tomography \u0000Key words: Apert syndrome; Acrocephalosyndactylia / diagnostic imaging; Acrocephalosyndactylia / pathology; Syndactyly / pathology; Maxillofacial reconstruction, Airway management \u0000Citation: Purwoko P, Azhar A, Permana SA. Difficult airway management in Apert syndrome for maxillofacial reconstruction: a case report. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;26(1):119-122. \u0000DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i1.1781 \u0000Received: October 27, 2021, Reviewed: November 11, 2021, Accepted: November 14, 2021","PeriodicalId":7735,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46879655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-02-07DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i1.1765
M. M. Hassan, E. Saleh, Norma Osama Abdalla, Noha Hassan Radwan, E. M. Abdelghfar
Background & Objectives: Stress response to extensive surgeries in cancer patients results in an imbalance between the pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines, besides activating an inflammatory cascade. We investigated the comparative effects of intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine and lidocaine on proinflammatory cytokines and the stress reaction. Methodology: A prospective randomized double blind trial was performed in National Cancer Institute. 54 patients scheduled for pelvi–abdominal cancer surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to three equal groups. Lidocaine group: patients received 1.5 mg/kg loading dose of lidocaine followed by 1.5 mg/kg/h infusion; Dexmedetomidine group: received a loading dose of dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg followed by infusion of 0.5 µg/kg/h; or Saline group: received 50 ml of normal saline followed by infusion at a rate of 10 ml/h till the end of the surgery. The primary outcome was a postoperative target level of IL–6 after 24 h. Results: Immediate and 24 h postoperative IL–6 and TNFα were significantly lower in both dexmedetomidine and lidocaine groups compared to the control group (P < 0.001). Dexmedetomidine group had a significantly lower IL–6 and TNFα levels compared to lidocaine group at immediate postoperative and 24 h postoperative period (P < 0.001). Dexmedetomidine and lidocaine groups had a significantly lower lactate and insulin levels compared to the control group immediately postoperatively as well as 24 h postoperatively (P < 0.001). The dexmedetomidine group had a significantly lower lactate levels compared to the lidocaine group immediately postoperatively only. The lidocaine group had lower insulin level than the control group regarding immediate postoperative period only. Conclusion: Intraoperative infusion of dexmedetomidine or lidocaine, both attenuate the postoperative levels of proinflammatory cytokines and stress response in patients undergoing pelvi–abdominal cancer surgeries. Clinical trial registration: The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 04148599). Key words: Lidocaine; Dexmedetomidine; Interleukins; Tumor necrosis factor-α; Stress response; Pelvi–abdominal cancer; Surgery Abbreviations: TNF - Tumor necrosis factor; IL – Interleukins; Citation: Hassan MM, Saleh RG, Abdalla NO, Radwan NH, Abdelghfar EM. Effect of lidocaine infusion compared to dexmedetomidine infusion on proinflammatory cytokines and stress response in pelvi–abdominal cancer surgeries: a randomized clinical trial. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;26 (1):44-52. DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i1.1765 Received: February 15, 2021, Reviewed: December 02, 2021, Accepted: December 05, 2021
背景与目的:肿瘤患者广泛手术后的应激反应除了激活炎症级联外,还会导致促炎和抗炎细胞因子之间的失衡。我们比较了静脉输注右美托咪定和利多卡因对促炎细胞因子和应激反应的影响。方法:在美国国家癌症研究所进行前瞻性随机双盲试验,将54例在全身麻醉下进行盆腔腹部肿瘤手术的患者随机分为三组。利多卡因组:先给药1.5 mg/kg负荷剂量,再输注1.5 mg/kg/h;右美托咪定组:右美托咪定加载剂量1µg/kg后再输注0.5µg/kg/h;生理盐水组:先给予生理盐水50 ml,再以10 ml/h的速率输注至手术结束。结果:与对照组相比,右美托咪定组和利多卡因组即刻和术后24 h的IL-6和tnf - α均显著降低(P < 0.001)。右美托咪定组术后即刻及术后24 h IL-6、TNFα水平明显低于利多卡因组(P < 0.001)。右美托咪定组和利多卡因组术后即刻及术后24 h的乳酸和胰岛素水平均显著低于对照组(P < 0.001)。右美托咪定组术后乳酸水平明显低于利多卡因组。仅术后即刻,利多卡因组胰岛素水平低于对照组。结论:术中输注右美托咪定或利多卡因均可降低盆腔癌术后患者的促炎细胞因子水平及应激反应。临床试验注册:该研究已在clinicaltrials.gov注册(NCT 04148599)。关键词:利多卡因;Dexmedetomidine;白细胞介素;肿瘤坏死因子-α;应激反应;Pelvi-abdominal癌症;外科缩略语:TNF -肿瘤坏死因子;IL -白细胞介素;引用本文:Hassan MM, Saleh RG, Abdalla NO, Radwan NH, Abdelghfar EM。输注利多卡因与输注右美托咪定对盆腔腹部肿瘤手术中促炎细胞因子和应激反应的影响:一项随机临床试验。Anaesth。疼痛重症监护2021;26(1):44-52。收稿日期:2021年2月15日,审稿日期:2021年12月02日,收稿日期:2021年12月05日
{"title":"Effect of lidocaine infusion compared to dexmedetomidine infusion on proinflammatory cytokines and stress response in pelvi–abdominal cancer surgeries: a randomized clinical trial","authors":"M. M. Hassan, E. Saleh, Norma Osama Abdalla, Noha Hassan Radwan, E. M. Abdelghfar","doi":"10.35975/apic.v26i1.1765","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v26i1.1765","url":null,"abstract":"Background & Objectives: Stress response to extensive surgeries in cancer patients results in an imbalance between the pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines, besides activating an inflammatory cascade. We investigated the comparative effects of intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine and lidocaine on proinflammatory cytokines and the stress reaction. \u0000Methodology: A prospective randomized double blind trial was performed in National Cancer Institute. 54 patients scheduled for pelvi–abdominal cancer surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to three equal groups. Lidocaine group: patients received 1.5 mg/kg loading dose of lidocaine followed by 1.5 mg/kg/h infusion; Dexmedetomidine group: received a loading dose of dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg followed by infusion of 0.5 µg/kg/h; or Saline group: received 50 ml of normal saline followed by infusion at a rate of 10 ml/h till the end of the surgery. The primary outcome was a postoperative target level of IL–6 after 24 h. \u0000Results: Immediate and 24 h postoperative IL–6 and TNFα were significantly lower in both dexmedetomidine and lidocaine groups compared to the control group (P < 0.001). Dexmedetomidine group had a significantly lower IL–6 and TNFα levels compared to lidocaine group at immediate postoperative and 24 h postoperative period (P < 0.001). Dexmedetomidine and lidocaine groups had a significantly lower lactate and insulin levels compared to the control group immediately postoperatively as well as 24 h postoperatively (P < 0.001). The dexmedetomidine group had a significantly lower lactate levels compared to the lidocaine group immediately postoperatively only. The lidocaine group had lower insulin level than the control group regarding immediate postoperative period only. \u0000Conclusion: Intraoperative infusion of dexmedetomidine or lidocaine, both attenuate the postoperative levels of proinflammatory cytokines and stress response in patients undergoing pelvi–abdominal cancer surgeries. \u0000Clinical trial registration: The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 04148599). \u0000Key words: Lidocaine; Dexmedetomidine; Interleukins; Tumor necrosis factor-α; Stress response; Pelvi–abdominal cancer; Surgery \u0000Abbreviations: TNF - Tumor necrosis factor; IL – Interleukins; \u0000Citation: Hassan MM, Saleh RG, Abdalla NO, Radwan NH, Abdelghfar EM. Effect of lidocaine infusion compared to dexmedetomidine infusion on proinflammatory cytokines and stress response in pelvi–abdominal cancer surgeries: a randomized clinical trial. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;26 (1):44-52. \u0000DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i1.1765 \u0000Received: February 15, 2021, Reviewed: December 02, 2021, Accepted: December 05, 2021","PeriodicalId":7735,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48160809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-02-07DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i1.1764
Y. Singh, Adarsh Kumar Yadav, Vijeta Bajpai, Priyanka Diwedi, S. Verma, R. Verma
Background & Objective: Hyperbaric bupivacaine is the most commonly used local anesthetic for spinal anesthesia, alone or in combination with various adjuvants. Opioids are frequently used for their rapid onset and intense block characteristics. Fentanyl is the preferred intrathecal opioids with rapid onset of action but has a shorter duration of action. Buprenorphine is a mixed agonist-antagonist with high affinity at both mu and kappa opioid receptors. We compared administration of buprenorphine with fentanyl as adjuvants with intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine in gynecological surgeries. Methodology: After Institutional Ethical Committee approval and written informed consent, 60 patients aged 18–65 y, scheduled for lower abdominal gynecological surgery, were divided into two equal groups; Group F to receive 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 2.5 ml with fentanyl 25 µg intrathecal and Group B to receive 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 2.5 ml with buprenorphine 75 µg intrathecal. Block characteristics and associated side effects were compared between two groups. The data was analyzed using Chi square test and Fisher’s exact test. For comparing two group of mean, independent student’s t test was used. P-value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: The mean onset of sensory and motor block was significantly earlier in Group F than Group B (p < 0.001). Mean duration of sensory block was significantly prolonged in Group B compared to Group F (p < 0.05). Whereas, the duration of motor was comparable in both of the groups (p > 0.05). Duration of analgesia was significantly prolonged in Group B than Group F (p < 0.001). Conclusion: We conclude that when a longer duration of postoperative pain relief is needed, buprenorphine can be a suitable drug to be used with intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine for gynecological surgeries because of prolonged duration of action. Key words: Spinal anesthesia; Fentanyl; Buprenorphine; Bupivacaine Citation: Singh Y, Yadav AK, Vijeta Bajpai, Diwedi P, Verma S, Verma RK. Comparison of intrathecal fentanyl and buprenorphine as adjuvants to bupivacaine in gynecological surgery. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;26(1):39-43. DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i1.1764
{"title":"Comparison of intrathecal fentanyl and buprenorphine as adjuvants to bupivacaine in gynecological surgery","authors":"Y. Singh, Adarsh Kumar Yadav, Vijeta Bajpai, Priyanka Diwedi, S. Verma, R. Verma","doi":"10.35975/apic.v26i1.1764","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v26i1.1764","url":null,"abstract":"Background & Objective: Hyperbaric bupivacaine is the most commonly used local anesthetic for spinal anesthesia, alone or in combination with various adjuvants. Opioids are frequently used for their rapid onset and intense block characteristics. Fentanyl is the preferred intrathecal opioids with rapid onset of action but has a shorter duration of action. Buprenorphine is a mixed agonist-antagonist with high affinity at both mu and kappa opioid receptors. We compared administration of buprenorphine with fentanyl as adjuvants with intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine in gynecological surgeries. \u0000Methodology: After Institutional Ethical Committee approval and written informed consent, 60 patients aged 18–65 y, scheduled for lower abdominal gynecological surgery, were divided into two equal groups; Group F to receive 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 2.5 ml with fentanyl 25 µg intrathecal and Group B to receive 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 2.5 ml with buprenorphine 75 µg intrathecal. Block characteristics and associated side effects were compared between two groups. The data was analyzed using Chi square test and Fisher’s exact test. For comparing two group of mean, independent student’s t test was used. P-value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. \u0000Results: The mean onset of sensory and motor block was significantly earlier in Group F than Group B (p < 0.001). Mean duration of sensory block was significantly prolonged in Group B compared to Group F (p < 0.05). Whereas, the duration of motor was comparable in both of the groups (p > 0.05). Duration of analgesia was significantly prolonged in Group B than Group F (p < 0.001). \u0000Conclusion: We conclude that when a longer duration of postoperative pain relief is needed, buprenorphine can be a suitable drug to be used with intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine for gynecological surgeries because of prolonged duration of action. \u0000Key words: Spinal anesthesia; Fentanyl; Buprenorphine; Bupivacaine \u0000Citation: Singh Y, Yadav AK, Vijeta Bajpai, Diwedi P, Verma S, Verma RK. Comparison of intrathecal fentanyl and buprenorphine as adjuvants to bupivacaine in gynecological surgery. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;26(1):39-43. \u0000DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i1.1764","PeriodicalId":7735,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47662591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-02-07DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i1.1758
M. Butt, Asma Faraz, M. Fazal
Summary Opium was the first opioids with sedative and analgesic effects, so was readily adopted by the surgical doctors to be used during surgeries. Later on its natural alkaloid, morphine, was extensively used, till synthetic alkaloids were introduced in the clinical practice. Now many non-narcotic analgesic drugs have been synthesized and proven to be devoid of serious side effects, commonly associated with the opioid use. There have been some staunch advocates of non-narcotic based anesthesia, who claim that the side effects of the opioids outweigh their benefits in the anesthesia. This editorial throws some light on the current and the future trends in analgesic use in anesthesia. Key words: Opioids; Analgesics; Non-opioid analgesics; Perioperative pain; Side effects Citation: Butt MN, Faraz A, Fazal M. Anesthesia without opioids (Editorial). Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;26(1):4–7; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i1.1758 Received: January 10, 2022, Accepted: January 12, 2022
鸦片是最早具有镇静、镇痛作用的阿片类药物,因此很容易被外科医生在手术中使用。后来它的天然生物碱吗啡被广泛使用,直到合成生物碱被引入临床。现在已经合成了许多非麻醉性镇痛药物,并被证明没有严重的副作用,通常与阿片类药物的使用有关。有一些坚定的非麻醉性麻醉的支持者,他们声称阿片类药物的副作用超过了麻醉的好处。这篇社论对麻醉中使用镇痛药的当前和未来趋势进行了一些阐述。关键词:阿片类药物;止痛剂;靶标止痛剂;围手术期疼痛;引证:Butt MN, Faraz A, Fazal M.无阿片类药物麻醉(社论)。Anaesth。疼痛重症监护2021;26(1):4-7;收稿日期:2022年1月10日,收稿日期:2022年1月12日
{"title":"Anesthesia without opioids","authors":"M. Butt, Asma Faraz, M. Fazal","doi":"10.35975/apic.v26i1.1758","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v26i1.1758","url":null,"abstract":"Summary \u0000Opium was the first opioids with sedative and analgesic effects, so was readily adopted by the surgical doctors to be used during surgeries. Later on its natural alkaloid, morphine, was extensively used, till synthetic alkaloids were introduced in the clinical practice. Now many non-narcotic analgesic drugs have been synthesized and proven to be devoid of serious side effects, commonly associated with the opioid use. There have been some staunch advocates of non-narcotic based anesthesia, who claim that the side effects of the opioids outweigh their benefits in the anesthesia. This editorial throws some light on the current and the future trends in analgesic use in anesthesia. \u0000Key words: Opioids; Analgesics; Non-opioid analgesics; Perioperative pain; Side effects \u0000Citation: Butt MN, Faraz A, Fazal M. Anesthesia without opioids (Editorial). Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;26(1):4–7; \u0000DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i1.1758 \u0000Received: January 10, 2022, Accepted: January 12, 2022","PeriodicalId":7735,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42896506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-02-07DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i1.1769
Amanjot Singh, J. Kaur, S. Kaur, K. Gupta
Background & objectives: The laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ (LMA-S) is a new, single-use, supraglottic device that combines the functionality of the ProSeal™ and Fastrach™ airways. Till now, there have been conflicting results regarding the oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) of the LMA Supreme™ vs. the LMA ProSeal™, which is the major determinant of effective ventilation and airway protection during LMA use. We compared the safety and efficacy of the LMA ProSeal™ vs. the LMA Supreme™ in ambulatory surgeries. Methodology: In this prospective, comparative trial, eighty adult patients undergoing elective surgery, were randomly allocated to one of the two groups: Group LMA–P (LMA ProSeal™ group) and Group LMA–S (LMA Supreme™ group) of 40 patients each. OLP, insertion times, number of insertion attempts, ease of insertion and pharyngolaryngeal morbidity were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 21.0 software using Student’s t-test and Chi-square test. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: Oropharyngeal leak pressure in Group LMA–P (26.65 ± 1.59 cmH2O) was comparable to Group LMA–S (26.08 ± 1.67 cmH2O) and both provided adequate seal and effective ventilation. The mean effective airway time was significantly less in Group LMA–S as compared to Group LMA–P (14.80 ± 1.24 sec and 17.80 ± 1.47 sec) respectively. Mean number of successful insertion attempts, hemodynamic response and pharyngolaryngeal morbidity were comparable in both the groups. Conclusion: Both LMA Supreme™ and LMA ProSeal™ are equally efficacious and safe for maintaining airway and ventilation in paralyzed patients. However, LMA Supreme™ is easier to insert with shorter effective airway time than LMA ProSeal™. Abbreviations: SAD - Supraglottic airway device; ETI - Endotracheal intubation; LMA - Laryngeal mask airways; PPV - Positive pressure ventilation; OLP - oropharyngeal leak pressure Key words: LMA ProSeal™, LMA Supreme™, Oropharyngeal leak pressure; Airway; Aieway management Citation: Singh A, Kaur J, Kaur S, Gupta KK. Safety and efficacy of LMA Supreme™ vs. LMA ProSeal™ for ambulatory surgeries in adult patients. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;26(1):63-68. DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i1.1769 Received: June 02, 2021, Reviewed: December 13, 2021, Accepted: December 15, 2021
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of LMA Supreme™ vs. LMA ProSeal™ for ambulatory surgeries in adult patients","authors":"Amanjot Singh, J. Kaur, S. Kaur, K. Gupta","doi":"10.35975/apic.v26i1.1769","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v26i1.1769","url":null,"abstract":"Background & objectives: The laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ (LMA-S) is a new, single-use, supraglottic device that combines the functionality of the ProSeal™ and Fastrach™ airways. Till now, there have been conflicting results regarding the oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) of the LMA Supreme™ vs. the LMA ProSeal™, which is the major determinant of effective ventilation and airway protection during LMA use. We compared the safety and efficacy of the LMA ProSeal™ vs. the LMA Supreme™ in ambulatory surgeries. \u0000Methodology: In this prospective, comparative trial, eighty adult patients undergoing elective surgery, were randomly allocated to one of the two groups: Group LMA–P (LMA ProSeal™ group) and Group LMA–S (LMA Supreme™ group) of 40 patients each. OLP, insertion times, number of insertion attempts, ease of insertion and pharyngolaryngeal morbidity were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 21.0 software using Student’s t-test and Chi-square test. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. \u0000Results: Oropharyngeal leak pressure in Group LMA–P (26.65 ± 1.59 cmH2O) was comparable to Group LMA–S (26.08 ± 1.67 cmH2O) and both provided adequate seal and effective ventilation. The mean effective airway time was significantly less in Group LMA–S as compared to Group LMA–P (14.80 ± 1.24 sec and 17.80 ± 1.47 sec) respectively. Mean number of successful insertion attempts, hemodynamic response and pharyngolaryngeal morbidity were comparable in both the groups. \u0000Conclusion: Both LMA Supreme™ and LMA ProSeal™ are equally efficacious and safe for maintaining airway and ventilation in paralyzed patients. However, LMA Supreme™ is easier to insert with shorter effective airway time than LMA ProSeal™. \u0000Abbreviations: SAD - Supraglottic airway device; ETI - Endotracheal intubation; LMA - Laryngeal mask airways; PPV - Positive pressure ventilation; OLP - oropharyngeal leak pressure \u0000Key words: LMA ProSeal™, LMA Supreme™, Oropharyngeal leak pressure; Airway; Aieway management \u0000Citation: Singh A, Kaur J, Kaur S, Gupta KK. Safety and efficacy of LMA Supreme™ vs. LMA ProSeal™ for ambulatory surgeries in adult patients. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;26(1):63-68. \u0000DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i1.1769 \u0000Received: June 02, 2021, Reviewed: December 13, 2021, Accepted: December 15, 2021","PeriodicalId":7735,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43145630","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-02-07DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i1.1760
Jiwook Kim, H. Kim, M. Yun, J. Lee, Joo-Duck Kim, D. Kang
Background: An unintentional large dose of dexmedetomidine during sedation can lead to increased side effects such as bradycardia and hypotension. We investigated whether the frequency of bradycardia in patients undergoing surgery under spinal anesthesia and sedation with dexmedetomidine was effected if bispectral index (BIS) was used to monitor the sedation. Methodology: Fifty patients between 20 and 60 y of age, who underwent spinal anesthesia, were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups (control and BIS groups). Patients in the control group were administered a loading dose of 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine for the first 10 min without BIS monitoring, followed by a maintenance dose of 0.2 μg/kg/h. Patients in the BIS group received a loading dose of 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine for the first 10 min. The maintenance dose in this group was administered at the discretion of the anesthesiologist to maintain the BIS score between 50 and 70. The baseline heart rate (HR), lowest HR, and the difference between baseline and the lowest HR were calculated. Results: The baseline HR was 74.4 ± 11.0 beats per minute (bpm) and 80.9 ± 16.0 bpm, in the control and BIS groups respectively (p = 0.098). The difference between the baseline and lowest HR in the control and BIS groups was 19.4 ± 7.6 bpm and 25.5 ± 8.8 bpm, respectively (p = 0.011). Low baseline HR was positively correlated with a reduced lowest HR. Conclusions: The frequency of bradycardia during sedation with dexmedetomidine decreased with BIS monitoring. Patients with a low baseline HR were more likely to develop bradycardia during sedation with dexmedetomidine. Therefore, BIS monitoring may be helpful in patients with low baseline HR. Key words: Bispectral index monitor; Dexmedetomidine; heart rate; spinal anesthesia Citation: Kim J, Kim HY, Yun M, Lee J, Kim JD, Kang D. Bispectral index monitoring during sedation with dexmedetomidine in spinal anesthesia prevents bradycardia: a randomized clinical trial. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;26(1):14-19 ; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i1.1760
{"title":"Bispectral index monitoring in spinal anesthesia with sedation can prevent dexmedetomidine related bradycardia: a randomized clinical trial","authors":"Jiwook Kim, H. Kim, M. Yun, J. Lee, Joo-Duck Kim, D. Kang","doi":"10.35975/apic.v26i1.1760","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v26i1.1760","url":null,"abstract":"Background: An unintentional large dose of dexmedetomidine during sedation can lead to increased side effects such as bradycardia and hypotension. We investigated whether the frequency of bradycardia in patients undergoing surgery under spinal anesthesia and sedation with dexmedetomidine was effected if bispectral index (BIS) was used to monitor the sedation. \u0000Methodology: Fifty patients between 20 and 60 y of age, who underwent spinal anesthesia, were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups (control and BIS groups). Patients in the control group were administered a loading dose of 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine for the first 10 min without BIS monitoring, followed by a maintenance dose of 0.2 μg/kg/h. Patients in the BIS group received a loading dose of 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine for the first 10 min. The maintenance dose in this group was administered at the discretion of the anesthesiologist to maintain the BIS score between 50 and 70. The baseline heart rate (HR), lowest HR, and the difference between baseline and the lowest HR were calculated. \u0000Results: The baseline HR was 74.4 ± 11.0 beats per minute (bpm) and 80.9 ± 16.0 bpm, in the control and BIS groups respectively (p = 0.098). The difference between the baseline and lowest HR in the control and BIS groups was 19.4 ± 7.6 bpm and 25.5 ± 8.8 bpm, respectively (p = 0.011). Low baseline HR was positively correlated with a reduced lowest HR. \u0000Conclusions: The frequency of bradycardia during sedation with dexmedetomidine decreased with BIS monitoring. Patients with a low baseline HR were more likely to develop bradycardia during sedation with dexmedetomidine. Therefore, BIS monitoring may be helpful in patients with low baseline HR. \u0000Key words: Bispectral index monitor; Dexmedetomidine; heart rate; spinal anesthesia \u0000Citation: Kim J, Kim HY, Yun M, Lee J, Kim JD, Kang D. Bispectral index monitoring during sedation with dexmedetomidine in spinal anesthesia prevents bradycardia: a randomized clinical trial. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;26(1):14-19 ; \u0000DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i1.1760","PeriodicalId":7735,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49506702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-02-07DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i1.1759
Ashita Mowar, Vishwadeepak Singh, A. Pahade, Geeta Karki
Background: Dexmedetomidine has increasingly been used in regional anesthesia as an adjuvant, but there is still no consensus on the optimum dose when it is used intrathecally. We conducted this study to elucidate the dose-response relation between three different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine (2.5, 5, or 10 µg) as an adjuvant to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing elective lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries. Methodology: 90 patients, aged 18-60 y, were randomized into three groups of 30 patients each. Group A received 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg (2.5 ml) with 2.5 µg dexmedetomidine, Group B received 5 µg dexmedetomidine with bupivacaine, and Group C received 10 µg dexmedetomidine with bupivacaine. Duration of the spinal sensory blockade (primary outcome), onset of the blockade, time to rescue analgesia, level of sedation, duration of motor blockade, comparison of hemodynamic variables and complications, if any were assessed. Results: There was a significant dose dependent prolongation of sensory block; Group A - 250.67 ± 51.39, Group B - 286 ± 52.76, and Group C - 351.00 ± 47.00 min; (p < 0.001), motor block; Group A - 255.53 ± 44.25, Group B - 312 ± 29.64, and Group C - 361.4 ± 16.14 min (p < 0.001). Time to two segment regression was 132.33 ± 48.29, 148.77 ± 48.89, 171.57 ± 25.46 min (p = 0.002) and time for rescue analgesia was 351.33 ± 101.19, 472.00 ± 24.41, 738.00 ± 67.79 min (p < 0.001). VAS was significantly low in Group C (p < 0.05). Intergroup hemodynamic parameters were comparable (p > 0.05) without any appreciable side effects. Conclusion: Spinal dexmedetomidine increases the sensory and motor block durations as well as time to first analgesic use, and decreases analgesic consumption in a dose-dependent manner, when used with hyperbaric bupivacaine. Abbreviations: IT - Intrathecal; ITD - Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine; SAB - Subarachnoid Block; VAS - Visual Analogue Scale; BMI - Body Mass Index; NIBP - Non-Invasive Blood Pressure; RSS - Ramsay Sedation Score; TSSR - Two segment sensory regression; ANOVA - Analysis of Variance; OSB - Onset of sensory block, TSSRT - Two segment sensory regression time; Duration of sensory blockade; OMB - Onset of motor block; DMB - Duration of motor blockade Key words: Dexmedetomidine; Bupivacaine; Anesthesia, Spinal; Dexmedetomidine; Post-operative analgesia Citation: Mowar A, Singh V, Pahade A, Karki G. Effect of three different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine on subarachnoid block: a prospective randomized double-blind trial. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;26(1):8–13; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i1.1759 Received: July 24, 2021, Reviewed: November 18, 2021, Accepted: November 28, 2021
{"title":"Effect of three different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine on subarachnoid block: a prospective randomized double-blind trial","authors":"Ashita Mowar, Vishwadeepak Singh, A. Pahade, Geeta Karki","doi":"10.35975/apic.v26i1.1759","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v26i1.1759","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Dexmedetomidine has increasingly been used in regional anesthesia as an adjuvant, but there is still no consensus on the optimum dose when it is used intrathecally. We conducted this study to elucidate the dose-response relation between three different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine (2.5, 5, or 10 µg) as an adjuvant to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing elective lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries. \u0000Methodology: 90 patients, aged 18-60 y, were randomized into three groups of 30 patients each. Group A received 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg (2.5 ml) with 2.5 µg dexmedetomidine, Group B received 5 µg dexmedetomidine with bupivacaine, and Group C received 10 µg dexmedetomidine with bupivacaine. Duration of the spinal sensory blockade (primary outcome), onset of the blockade, time to rescue analgesia, level of sedation, duration of motor blockade, comparison of hemodynamic variables and complications, if any were assessed. \u0000Results: There was a significant dose dependent prolongation of sensory block; Group A - 250.67 ± 51.39, Group B - 286 ± 52.76, and Group C - 351.00 ± 47.00 min; (p < 0.001), motor block; Group A - 255.53 ± 44.25, Group B - 312 ± 29.64, and Group C - 361.4 ± 16.14 min (p < 0.001). Time to two segment regression was 132.33 ± 48.29, 148.77 ± 48.89, 171.57 ± 25.46 min (p = 0.002) and time for rescue analgesia was 351.33 ± 101.19, 472.00 ± 24.41, 738.00 ± 67.79 min (p < 0.001). VAS was significantly low in Group C (p < 0.05). Intergroup hemodynamic parameters were comparable (p > 0.05) without any appreciable side effects. \u0000Conclusion: Spinal dexmedetomidine increases the sensory and motor block durations as well as time to first analgesic use, and decreases analgesic consumption in a dose-dependent manner, when used with hyperbaric bupivacaine. \u0000Abbreviations: IT - Intrathecal; ITD - Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine; SAB - Subarachnoid Block; VAS - Visual Analogue Scale; BMI - Body Mass Index; NIBP - Non-Invasive Blood Pressure; RSS - Ramsay Sedation Score; TSSR - Two segment sensory regression; ANOVA - Analysis of Variance; OSB - Onset of sensory block, TSSRT - Two segment sensory regression time; Duration of sensory blockade; OMB - Onset of motor block; DMB - Duration of motor blockade \u0000Key words: Dexmedetomidine; Bupivacaine; Anesthesia, Spinal; Dexmedetomidine; Post-operative analgesia \u0000Citation: Mowar A, Singh V, Pahade A, Karki G. Effect of three different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine on subarachnoid block: a prospective randomized double-blind trial. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;26(1):8–13; \u0000DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i1.1759 \u0000Received: July 24, 2021, Reviewed: November 18, 2021, Accepted: November 28, 2021","PeriodicalId":7735,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43196329","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}