America's Racist Founding? An East-European View

Q4 Arts and Humanities Opera Historica Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.32725/oph.2021.006
Ivo Cerman
{"title":"America's Racist Founding? An East-European View","authors":"Ivo Cerman","doi":"10.32725/oph.2021.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By now everybody must have heard about The 1619 Project of the New York Times Magazine and the recent push to reinterpret the American Revolution as a racist enterprise which aimed at preserving slavery.1 There is a difference between saying that the United States failed to abolish slavery at a federal level, and saying that it declared independence precisely to preserve slavery. It is one thing to claim that white racists who tortured a Black American war veteran in 1946 were betraying Jefferson’s ideals, and it is quite another thing to say they were acting on the basis of „the same racist ideology that Jefferson and the framers used as the nation’s founding.“2 The 1619 Project was a 100-page supplement to The New York Times magazine published in August 2019 to recall the 400 years since the arrival of the first Black slaves in the present-day USA. It includes an introductory essay by Nikole Hannah-Jones and ten short essays on various topics relating to slavery by multiple authors. In June 2020 it was followed by another supplement edited by Nikole Hannah-Jones that uses the historical narrative to justify reparations for Black Americans.3 Since then it has grown into an initiative that aims to reframe the entire history of the USA and make this reframed history the basis of school education. The narrative is also being imposed on historians. According to the New York Times Magazine, the preservation of slavery has been the main mission of the United States throughout its entire history. Hence the shift from 1776 to 1619, the year in which allegedly the first Black slaves arrived in the present-day USA. In the flowery language of the editor Jake Silverstein, this was the moment when the „seeds“ were planted, and the racist flower took its „roots“.4 This metaphorical language manipulates the reader into believing that everything in American history has been determined by its „seeds“, and there is no other remedy than uprooting the whole plant that has been growing since 1619. In the words of Jake Silverstein, the aim of The 1619 Project is „to reframe American history by considering what it would mean to regard 1619 as our nation’s birth year.“5","PeriodicalId":36082,"journal":{"name":"Opera Historica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Opera Historica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32725/oph.2021.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By now everybody must have heard about The 1619 Project of the New York Times Magazine and the recent push to reinterpret the American Revolution as a racist enterprise which aimed at preserving slavery.1 There is a difference between saying that the United States failed to abolish slavery at a federal level, and saying that it declared independence precisely to preserve slavery. It is one thing to claim that white racists who tortured a Black American war veteran in 1946 were betraying Jefferson’s ideals, and it is quite another thing to say they were acting on the basis of „the same racist ideology that Jefferson and the framers used as the nation’s founding.“2 The 1619 Project was a 100-page supplement to The New York Times magazine published in August 2019 to recall the 400 years since the arrival of the first Black slaves in the present-day USA. It includes an introductory essay by Nikole Hannah-Jones and ten short essays on various topics relating to slavery by multiple authors. In June 2020 it was followed by another supplement edited by Nikole Hannah-Jones that uses the historical narrative to justify reparations for Black Americans.3 Since then it has grown into an initiative that aims to reframe the entire history of the USA and make this reframed history the basis of school education. The narrative is also being imposed on historians. According to the New York Times Magazine, the preservation of slavery has been the main mission of the United States throughout its entire history. Hence the shift from 1776 to 1619, the year in which allegedly the first Black slaves arrived in the present-day USA. In the flowery language of the editor Jake Silverstein, this was the moment when the „seeds“ were planted, and the racist flower took its „roots“.4 This metaphorical language manipulates the reader into believing that everything in American history has been determined by its „seeds“, and there is no other remedy than uprooting the whole plant that has been growing since 1619. In the words of Jake Silverstein, the aim of The 1619 Project is „to reframe American history by considering what it would mean to regard 1619 as our nation’s birth year.“5
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国的种族主义建国?东欧观点
到目前为止,大家一定都听说过《纽约时报杂志》的“1619计划”,以及最近有人把美国革命重新解释为一场旨在维护奴隶制的种族主义事业说美国未能在联邦层面废除奴隶制,和说美国宣布独立恰恰是为了保留奴隶制,这两者之间是有区别的。声称在1946年折磨美国黑人退伍军人的白人种族主义者背叛了杰斐逊的理想是一回事,而说他们的行为是基于“杰斐逊和开国元勋们赖以建国的种族主义意识形态”又是另一回事。《1619计划》是《纽约时报》杂志于2019年8月出版的一份100页的增刊,旨在纪念第一批黑人奴隶来到今天的美国400年。它包括一篇由Nikole hanna - jones撰写的介绍性文章和十篇由多位作者撰写的关于奴隶制的各种主题的短文。2020年6月,Nikole hanna - jones编辑了另一份增刊,利用历史叙述来证明对美国黑人的赔偿是合理的。从那时起,它已经发展成为一项旨在重新构建整个美国历史的倡议,并使这一重新构建的历史成为学校教育的基础。这种叙述也被强加给了历史学家。据《纽约时报》杂志报道,维持奴隶制一直是美国历史上的主要使命。因此,从1776年到1619年,据说第一批黑人奴隶到达今天的美国。用编辑杰克·西尔弗斯坦华丽的语言来说,这是种族主义“种子”种下的时刻,种族主义之花“扎下了根”这种隐喻性的语言使读者相信,美国历史上的一切都是由它的“种子”决定的,除了将自1619年以来一直生长的这棵植物连根拔起之外,没有其他补救办法。用杰克·西尔弗斯坦(Jake Silverstein)的话说,“1619计划”的目的是“通过考虑将1619年视为我们国家的诞生年份意味着什么,来重新构建美国历史。”“5
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Opera Historica
Opera Historica Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Gifts of animals as a means of symbolic communication among the pre-White Mountain nobility On the Muscovite Gifts to the Austrian Habsburgs in the Late 16th Century Obraz Rudolfa II. v komunikaci mantovských vyslanců na císařském dvoře během sporu o říšské léno Novellara (1587-1591) News of the World The Role of Handwritten Newspapers in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in the Early 18th Century Between rhetoric and propaganda Jesuit and Piarist panegyrics in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1