Visualizing Equality: African American Rights and Visual Culture in the Nineteenth Century by Aston Gonzalez (review)

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1353/afa.2022.0049
Ryan A. Charlton
{"title":"Visualizing Equality: African American Rights and Visual Culture in the Nineteenth Century by Aston Gonzalez (review)","authors":"Ryan A. Charlton","doi":"10.1353/afa.2022.0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"for example, detailed discussion of the “scenes of parting” from loved ones represented in several slave narratives (264-65). This chapter in particular is a testament to how much white supremacy enveloped even arguments for personhood and “uplift,” severely circumscribing the kinds of print identities open to Black authors. Andrews is blunt about one of the book’s shortcomings, devoting most of the epilogue to the recognition that time and space prevent more than brief nods to slave narratives published after 1865; he ends the volume saying that “the testimony of this later generation of narrators awaits the hearing it deserves” (321). But the book leaves other questions, too. Certainly we should also study pre-1840 narratives, especially in the frames of the Black Atlantic world and the US’s break from Britain. Further, while Andrews considers the handful of women authors in a maledominated genre (with deep attention to Harriet Jacobs) as well as enslaved women who are discussed by male authors, gender does not often become a category of analysis here. (Andrews’s examples often suggest that enslaved women’s experiences of class may have been both different and more complex than those of many enslaved men.) And while the book is haunted by the recognition that enslaved people were legally chattel, it could say more about how enslaved people fashioned class and status when their commodified bodies served as markers of white enslavers’ class and status—topics raised by scholars from Walter Johnson to Daina Ramey Berry. Andrews is unrelenting in treating the texts as, per his subtitle, “testimony,” and, in this powerful echo of John Blassingame, he rightly reminds of whom we should listen to most when it comes to the historical record of slavery. Occasionally, though, this limits his discussion of slave narratives as built objects. Andrews notes, for example, that he does not follow authors’ class status outside of their narratives, and, beyond rich material in chapter one, he does not fully explore questions of class among nominally free African Americans. Most authors of slave narratives were writing while they were fashioning places for themselves in Northern spaces— and in communities whose class sensibilities have been explored by scholars from Julie Winch and Leslie Harris to Erica Armstrong Dunbar and Carla Peterson. Further, several narratives in Andrews’s study were enmeshed in the material culture and the business of antislavery—richly explored by Teresa Goddu. Apart from brief gestures in chapter four, we don’t learn much about how authors’ risky places as new Northerners may have shaped the kinds of testimony they chose—or were able—to offer. But each of these gaps would need another book—yea, books—to even introduce them adequately. Key among the wonders of Andrews’s volume is the grace with which he draws clear lines around what his single book can do and then gestures beyond those lines. I think we will be returning to Slavery and Class in the American South for a long time—not only for the field-changing work it does but also for the even more massive work it should compel all of us to do.","PeriodicalId":44779,"journal":{"name":"AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/afa.2022.0049","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

for example, detailed discussion of the “scenes of parting” from loved ones represented in several slave narratives (264-65). This chapter in particular is a testament to how much white supremacy enveloped even arguments for personhood and “uplift,” severely circumscribing the kinds of print identities open to Black authors. Andrews is blunt about one of the book’s shortcomings, devoting most of the epilogue to the recognition that time and space prevent more than brief nods to slave narratives published after 1865; he ends the volume saying that “the testimony of this later generation of narrators awaits the hearing it deserves” (321). But the book leaves other questions, too. Certainly we should also study pre-1840 narratives, especially in the frames of the Black Atlantic world and the US’s break from Britain. Further, while Andrews considers the handful of women authors in a maledominated genre (with deep attention to Harriet Jacobs) as well as enslaved women who are discussed by male authors, gender does not often become a category of analysis here. (Andrews’s examples often suggest that enslaved women’s experiences of class may have been both different and more complex than those of many enslaved men.) And while the book is haunted by the recognition that enslaved people were legally chattel, it could say more about how enslaved people fashioned class and status when their commodified bodies served as markers of white enslavers’ class and status—topics raised by scholars from Walter Johnson to Daina Ramey Berry. Andrews is unrelenting in treating the texts as, per his subtitle, “testimony,” and, in this powerful echo of John Blassingame, he rightly reminds of whom we should listen to most when it comes to the historical record of slavery. Occasionally, though, this limits his discussion of slave narratives as built objects. Andrews notes, for example, that he does not follow authors’ class status outside of their narratives, and, beyond rich material in chapter one, he does not fully explore questions of class among nominally free African Americans. Most authors of slave narratives were writing while they were fashioning places for themselves in Northern spaces— and in communities whose class sensibilities have been explored by scholars from Julie Winch and Leslie Harris to Erica Armstrong Dunbar and Carla Peterson. Further, several narratives in Andrews’s study were enmeshed in the material culture and the business of antislavery—richly explored by Teresa Goddu. Apart from brief gestures in chapter four, we don’t learn much about how authors’ risky places as new Northerners may have shaped the kinds of testimony they chose—or were able—to offer. But each of these gaps would need another book—yea, books—to even introduce them adequately. Key among the wonders of Andrews’s volume is the grace with which he draws clear lines around what his single book can do and then gestures beyond those lines. I think we will be returning to Slavery and Class in the American South for a long time—not only for the field-changing work it does but also for the even more massive work it should compel all of us to do.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视觉化的平等:19世纪非裔美国人的权利与视觉文化作者:阿斯顿·冈萨雷斯
例如,详细讨论了几个奴隶叙事(264-65)中所代表的与亲人的“离别场景”。这一章尤其证明了白人至上主义在多大程度上甚至涵盖了人格和“提升”的论点,严重限制了黑人作家的印刷身份。安德鲁斯直言不讳地指出了这本书的一个缺点,他在结语的大部分时间里都承认,时间和空间阻碍了对1865年后出版的奴隶叙事的简短认可;他在书的结尾说,“这一代讲述者的证词等待着它应得的听证会”(321)。但这本书也留下了其他问题。当然,我们也应该研究1840年之前的叙事,尤其是在黑大西洋世界和美国脱离英国的框架下。此外,尽管Andrews考虑了少数男性主导类型的女性作家(对Harriet Jacobs有着深刻的关注),以及男性作家讨论的被奴役女性,但性别在这里通常不会成为一个分析类别。(安德鲁斯的例子经常表明,被奴役的女性的阶级经历可能与许多被奴役的男性不同,也更复杂。)尽管这本书被承认被奴役的人是合法的动产所困扰,它可以更多地说明,当被奴役者商品化的身体成为白人奴隶阶级和地位的标志时,他们是如何塑造阶级和地位——从沃尔特·约翰逊到戴娜·拉米·贝里等学者都提出了这些话题。根据他的副标题,安德鲁斯坚持不懈地将这些文本视为“证词”,在对约翰·布莱森game的有力回应中,他正确地提醒我们,在奴隶制的历史记录中,我们最应该倾听谁的声音。然而,这偶尔会限制他对奴隶叙事作为建筑对象的讨论。例如,安德鲁斯指出,他没有在作者的叙述之外关注他们的阶级地位,而且,除了第一章中丰富的材料之外,他也没有充分探讨名义上自由的非裔美国人的阶级问题。大多数奴隶叙事的作者都是在为自己在北方空间以及从朱莉·温奇和莱斯利·哈里斯到埃里卡·阿姆斯壮·邓巴和卡拉·彼得森等学者探索阶级情感的社区创造场所的时候写作的。此外,安德鲁斯研究中的几个叙事被卷入了物质文化和反奴隶制的商业中——特蕾莎·戈德杜对此进行了丰富的探索。除了第四章中的简短手势外,我们没有了解到作者作为新北方人的危险处境是如何塑造他们选择或能够提供的证词的。但这些空白中的每一个都需要另一本书——是的,书籍——来充分介绍它们。安德鲁斯这本书的神奇之处之一是,他优雅地围绕自己的一本书所能做的事情画出了清晰的界限,然后做出了超越这些界限的手势。我认为,我们将在很长一段时间内回到美国南方的奴隶制和阶级——不仅因为它所做的改变领域的工作,而且因为它应该迫使我们所有人做更大规模的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW
AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: As the official publication of the Division on Black American Literature and Culture of the Modern Language Association, the quarterly journal African American Review promotes a lively exchange among writers and scholars in the arts, humanities, and social sciences who hold diverse perspectives on African American literature and culture. Between 1967 and 1976, the journal appeared under the title Negro American Literature Forum and for the next fifteen years was titled Black American Literature Forum. In 1992, African American Review changed its name for a third time and expanded its mission to include the study of a broader array of cultural formations.
期刊最新文献
Fighting for the Higher Law: Black and White Transcendentalists against Slavery by Peter Wirzbicki (review) Ralph Ellison: Photographer by Michal Raz-Russo and John F. Callahan (review) I remember My Girl Is a Trip Prospect.5 New Orleans: Yesterday We Said Tomorrow by Naima J. Keith and Diana Nawi (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1